1080 Ti or 2080?

[gbergeron]

According to this you'll have like 80% gain with DLSS is this possible guys  maybe not on release tho ? but in 1 year when all games have dlss ?

[D13H4RD]

20 minutes ago, pas008 said:

If they want another class action suit im sure it will deliver

Considering its all they boasted about everywhere ignoring the plain raz performance everywhere

You blame nvidia for not making the games or api in dx for rt wow

>_>

 

No one said it won't deliver. I'm just saying it's probably not the wisest of decisions to plop down money for something that hasn't been properly tested and refined yet.

 

At the very least wait for reviews when RTX and DLSS features are enabled and we have games to test it on

[Jedibrysen]

1 hour ago, GracerEnriquez said:

Looking to upgrade by the end of this year. 

 

My rig is for gaming only. 

 

Current Specs:

i7 4790K

Asus Z97 Sabertooth Mark 1

16gb Corsair Dominator Platinum

GTX 980 Ti 

Seasonic X 650W

BenQ PD2700Q 1440p Monitor

 

I need your help guys. Thanks!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1080ti because RTX ray tracing isn’t supported by a lot of games rn

[pas008]

7 minutes ago, D13H4RD2L1V3 said:

>_>

 

No one said it won't deliver. I'm just saying it's probably not the wisest of decisions to plop down money for something that hasn't been properly tested and refined yet.

 

At the very least wait for reviews when RTX and DLSS features are enabled and we have games to test it on

read below italicized

33 minutes ago, pas008 said:

useless now, we all know dlss and rt is going to happen

you guys can blame nvidia for not being ready but truth is microsofts dx12 and developers arent ready

obviously these cards support it

dlss im not sure why its not ready but I'm thinking nvidia is making 1080ti look good right now without it

maybe those so called surplus of pascal cards will sell near retail lol another reason why we arent seeing the 2070

just my theory considering the news we know on surplus and gtx 2070 being held back

 

[TahoeDust]

From a post I made in another thread....

 

5 hours ago, TahoeDust said:

Meh...a new decent 1080ti is $650 and 2080 is $800.  $150 (20% price increase) for ~10% performance increase and RTX/DLSS capabilities.  I think some reactions are a little overblown, but value is in the eye of the beholder. 

 

[pas008]

7 minutes ago, TahoeDust said:

From a post I made in another thread....

 

 

dont forget nvenc boost lol

Turing GPUs include an enhanced NVENC encoder unit that adds support for H.265 (HEVC) 8K encode at 30 FPS. NVIDIA states the new encoder provides up to 25% bitrate savings for HEVC and up to 15% savings for H.264

[TahoeDust]

1 minute ago, pas008 said:

dont forget nvenc boost lol

Turing GPUs include an enhanced NVENC encoder unit that adds support for H.265 (HEVC) 8K encode at 30 FPS. NVIDIA states the new encoder provides up to 25% bitrate savings for HEVC and up to 15% savings for H.264

Agreed.  The 1080ti is a better value than a 2080 arguement is a little bit of a gut reaction imho.  6 months from now I promise the average user will pick a 2080 over a 1080ti.  

[pas008]

2 minutes ago, TahoeDust said:

Agreed.  The 1080ti is a better value than a 2080 arguement is a little bit of a gut reaction imho.  6 months from now I promise the average user will pick a 2080 over a 1080ti.  

agreed, watch by 2019 we will see 2080 towering over it, release drivers arent the best to go on

as many time early adopter had early issues many times not this gen though have other priorities(maybe video wall 2x2 4k in living room or 3rd vehicle or vacation) and 1080tisli is doing fine right now for what I play atm

 

on that note of issues I havent checked if hb sli bridge with surround has even been fixed yet lol

[TahoeDust]

Just now, pas008 said:

on that note of issues I havent checked if hb sli bridge with surround has even been fixed yet lol

Honestly, I have never tried it.  Once I went ultrawide I never went back to surround.  3440x1440 @ 100Hz+ is the best gaming experience I have had.  I am hoping my 2080ti will let me max everyting at 100Hz or better.

[pas008]

Just now, TahoeDust said:

Honestly, I have never tried it.  Once I went ultrawide I never went back to surround.  3440x1440 @ 100Hz+ is the best gaming experience I have had.  I am hoping my 2080ti will let me max everyting at 100Hz or better.

been a surround user since I could, sli user since 8k series, maybe it will roll over to that again lol

before I fiddled with softth

eyefinity was nice but limited to outputs of 1 card in xfire and xfire lacks way more than sli even with radeon pro at the time i was using it

considered the th2go from matrox but figured better spent on another card lol, but they did allow you to download many tools back in the day which helped for surround/eyefinity

still think about powerdesk again considering nvidias confine to single display shit goes on and off many times for center monitor powerdesk allows you to divide the windows monitor into pieces so the start shit goes to center monitor and did allow for accessory displays to have start menu I think been awhile since I used it like win7 days

 

[i_build_nanosuits]

10 hours ago, Jaggsta said:

1080Ti only worth it if can get it for under $600. 2080 will be faster once drivers are optimized you can see GTX 1080 2016 drivers vs 2018 10-20fps difference

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_TlwEyU5rY

are you serious, you havn't watched the video right?

because right at the 12 seconds mark...it says they used the new driver with a ASUS ROG STRIX 1080 and the old driver with a EVGA FOUNDERS EDITION GTX 1080...

so the performance delta is a lot more because of the fact that they used different graphics cards, a top of the line card vs. a bargain basement ill-equipped blower founder piece of trash than it is because of the driver updates LOL...come on

[cluelessgenius]

honestly id go hunting for a used 1080 ti right about now. alot of people will upgrade so maybe theres a deal to be had. i got mine used a couple of month ago for 580 € used an new its still 750ish and even the cheapest 1080 ti goes for 680ish soo... yeah.

[D13H4RD]

9 hours ago, TahoeDust said:

Agreed.  The 1080ti is a better value than a 2080 arguement is a little bit of a gut reaction imho.  6 months from now I promise the average user will pick a 2080 over a 1080ti.  

It’s worth noting that this is based on what we have now. Things may change in 6 months, but I wouldn’t recommend rushing out to buy one just yet because of this reason.

 

9 hours ago, TahoeDust said:

Honestly, I have never tried it.  Once I went ultrawide I never went back to surround.  3440x1440 @ 100Hz+ is the best gaming experience I have had.  I am hoping my 2080ti will let me max everyting at 100Hz or better.

I don’t think a 2080 Ti should have much issues with that for the most part.

[willsanforglend]

2080 is massively overpriced, nothing more to say

[Zeitec]

17 hours ago, GracerEnriquez said:

Looking to upgrade by the end of this year. 

 

My rig is for gaming only. 

 

Current Specs:

i7 4790K

Asus Z97 Sabertooth Mark 1

16gb Corsair Dominator Platinum

GTX 980 Ti 

Seasonic X 650W

BenQ PD2700Q 1440p Monitor

 

I need your help guys. Thanks!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Given you have a 980ti already I'd say neither, but if you definitely want one of them then I'd go 1080ti because it's a lot cheaper.