Jump to content

i5-8400 clocked lower than Kaby Lake’s 7400?

xDyl

So, I am planning on buying an i5, but I want to know, why would intel get rid of an i5-7500 follow up, and release the i5-8400 that is clocked at 2.8GHz? The i5-7400 was 3.0GHz. It almost is convincing me just to buy the i5-8600K, even though I won’t overclock.

"I'm not really that old, I'm just 18 + shipping" -Unknown

Please tell me why you aren't on dark theme already.

Herro my dark theme brothers.

 

Spoiler

Laptop: MacBook Pro Mid-2012 Non-Retinai7-3720QM, 8GB DDR3L-1600, 250GB SSD, macOS 10.13

Phone: iPhone 7 Plus that is patiently waiting to be jailbroken.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I hear, they'll be rounding out the full lineup with pentiums and other miscellaneous chips later in 2017 or early 2018. 


Main System: EVGA GTX 1080 SC, i7 8700, 16GB DDR4 Corsair LPX 3000mhz CL15, Asus Z370 Prime A, Noctua NH D15, EVGA GQ 650W, Fractal Design Define R5, 2TB Seagate Barracuda, 500gb Samsung 850 Evo
Secondary System: EVGA GTX 780ti SC, i5 3570k @ 4.5ghz, 16gb DDR3 1600mhz, MSI Z77 G43, Noctua NH D15, EVGA GQ 650W, Fractal Design Define R4, 3TB WD Caviar Blue, 250gb Samsung 850 Evo
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zeitec said:

From what I hear, they'll be rounding out the full lineup with pentiums and other miscellaneous chips later in 2017 or early 2018. 

Like the i5-8500? Or was that chip skipped?

"I'm not really that old, I'm just 18 + shipping" -Unknown

Please tell me why you aren't on dark theme already.

Herro my dark theme brothers.

 

Spoiler

Laptop: MacBook Pro Mid-2012 Non-Retinai7-3720QM, 8GB DDR3L-1600, 250GB SSD, macOS 10.13

Phone: iPhone 7 Plus that is patiently waiting to be jailbroken.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, xDyl said:

Like the i5-8500? Or was that chip skipped?

They'll probably make an 8500, an 8300, and a couple Pentium chips. 


Main System: EVGA GTX 1080 SC, i7 8700, 16GB DDR4 Corsair LPX 3000mhz CL15, Asus Z370 Prime A, Noctua NH D15, EVGA GQ 650W, Fractal Design Define R5, 2TB Seagate Barracuda, 500gb Samsung 850 Evo
Secondary System: EVGA GTX 780ti SC, i5 3570k @ 4.5ghz, 16gb DDR3 1600mhz, MSI Z77 G43, Noctua NH D15, EVGA GQ 650W, Fractal Design Define R4, 3TB WD Caviar Blue, 250gb Samsung 850 Evo
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its cause they rather have you purchase the more expensive chips instead. Just gotta hope the IPC would make up for the significantly lower clock speed.8400 wouldn't be a bad chip if it was clocked ~3.2. Boost of 4.0 make up for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It goes significantly higher on boost and has 6c.

Want to custom loop?  Ask me more if you are curious

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tp95112 said:

Its cause they rather have you purchase the more expensive chips instead. 

This, plus they also probably haven't finished binning all their production batches just yet (when looking at the specs for the various locked SKU's of the same i3/i5 generation, the only difference is usually just a slight clock speed offset released a little later after the main SKUs).

 

Those that don't QUITE make the cut as a regular locked i3/i5 are then sold as a lower-number SKU instead. Intel is just applying the same binning process (to determine Xeon/i9/i7/i5/i3/etc quality) to each tier instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2017 at 11:58 PM, xDyl said:

So, I am planning on buying an i5, but I want to know, why would intel get rid of an i5-7500 follow up, and release the i5-8400 that is clocked at 2.8GHz? The i5-7400 was 3.0GHz. It almost is convincing me just to buy the i5-8600K, even though I won’t overclock.

More cores, more cache, higher stock memory speed, and top turbo is 500MHz higher (4GHz) for the i5-8400, https://ark.intel.com/compare/97147,126687

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a lower clock because it has more cores, there has to be a sacrifice made somewhere. Also next year Q1 the rest of the Coffee Lake processors will come out. This is just the launch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×