Jump to content

Disable cores and hypertheads

I am interested in the performance gains from overclocking specifically to do with gaming and I have noticed the lower frame rate when using the i9 7900x. My question is would disabling the hyperthreading and a few cores be able to increase the overclocking ability of the chip enough so the frame rate will match the 7700k or even best it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, though maybe not.  I would start by going down to 6c/12t or 4c/8t depending on the game. 

Want to custom loop?  Ask me more if you are curious

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

it might, but it's not worth it.

those chips are still gaming beasts. I'm sure you don't have any problems.

 

it won't beat the 7700K most likely.

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Desktop:

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 - Lots of RGB lights I never change

Laptop:

HP Spectre X360 - i7 8560U - MX150 - 2TB SSD - 16GB DDR4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

[Disabling] anything that uses power can push the available headroom. By how much? I have no idea. @MageTank @Lays @done12many2

Cor Caeruleus Reborn v6

Spoiler

CPU: Intel - Core i7-8700K

CPU Cooler: be quiet! - PURE ROCK 
Thermal Compound: Arctic Silver - 5 High-Density Polysynthetic Silver 3.5g Thermal Paste 
Motherboard: ASRock Z370 Extreme4
Memory: G.Skill TridentZ RGB 2x8GB 3200/14
Storage: Samsung - 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive 
Storage: Samsung - 960 EVO 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive
Storage: Western Digital - Blue 2TB 3.5" 5400RPM Internal Hard Drive
Storage: Western Digital - BLACK SERIES 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive
Video Card: EVGA - 970 SSC ACX (1080 is in RMA)
Case: Fractal Design - Define R5 w/Window (Black) ATX Mid Tower Case
Power Supply: EVGA - SuperNOVA P2 750W with CableMod blue/black Pro Series
Optical Drive: LG - WH16NS40 Blu-Ray/DVD/CD Writer 
Operating System: Microsoft - Windows 10 Pro OEM 64-bit and Linux Mint Serena
Keyboard: Logitech - G910 Orion Spectrum RGB Wired Gaming Keyboard
Mouse: Logitech - G502 Wired Optical Mouse
Headphones: Logitech - G430 7.1 Channel  Headset
Speakers: Logitech - Z506 155W 5.1ch Speakers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you really buy a 7900X to turn cores off? If you're going to do that, might as well start lower down in the series. Otherwise, just run the 7900X as best you can.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience with consumer i7's (4c/8t), HT adds about 15w of heat. I don't think disabling HT in and of itself will yield higher overclocking unless you are seriously restricted by thermal headroom. Cores on the other hand, that might be a different story entirely. 

My (incomplete) memory overclocking guide: 

 

Does memory speed impact gaming performance? Click here to find out!

On 1/2/2017 at 9:32 PM, MageTank said:

Sometimes, we all need a little inspiration.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of disabling cores, you should consider manually setting your "favorite cores" to higher clockspeeds.

 

Your 7900X shipped with Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0, which works seamlessly now with Windows 10.  Before the CPU left the factory, Intel determined what the best 2 cores were on the CPU (favorite cores) and programmed them to scale higher than the rest of the cores at stock in low thread situations.  These cores are marked in your BIOS with an asterisk (*).

 

When you manually overclock your CPU, you can still increase the 2 favorite cores 1 or 2 multipliers higher than the rest.  Play around with it to determine what suits you best, but it's really not that complicated at all.  Hell, it's a lot more convenient than continually switching overclocks or saved profiles in BIOS all the time when switching from a few core to all cores. 

 

With the 7900x I had, I was able to get 4 cores to run higher than the rest of the cores with perfect stability without increasing VCore.  Windows would still shift tasks that used lower threads to all of the higher clocked cores even though all weren't technically "favorite cores" programmed by Intel.

 

Don't worry about the Window's scheduler and whether or not Windows will use the higher clocked cores for lower thread applications such as games.  It does it automatically as Microsoft added the Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 driver into the OS a while ago with Broadwell-E.  Initially it relied on a separate Intel driver to be installed, but it all happens automatically now.  While it may not be perfect for every application, it's damn close. 

 

Setting up your system in this manner will allow you to reap the benefits of high single core performance while retaining the strong multi core performance.  


You can definitely get similar gaming performance out of a 7900x when compared to a 7700k at the same clockspeed.  Because the CPU was primarily designed with different things in mind, you just have to adjust some stuff to get there.  Once it's done, it just works.  In non-gaming applications, the 7900x will actually beat the 7700k core for core and clock for clock depending on what you are doing.  

 

In the example screen shot below, you'll see that I had 3 cores running at a higher clock (bolded blue).  This screen shot is NOT in load as the test had already passed when I captured it, but you can look at the max (2nd from the right) and average columns (furthest to the right) to see what was going on.  

 

If you need any specific help with setting any of this up, just ask.

 

 

1hr RB @ 4.7 with 4.8 turbo 3.0 x 3 cores.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×