Jump to content

AMD 32core CPUs benchmarked!!

PCGuy_5960
By PCGuy_5960
in Tech News
 Share
Go to solution Solved by Sauron,
18 minutes ago, patrickjp93 said:

At least the results are valid between members of the same ISA. It's not like the lunacy comparison between ISAs when ARM gets vector optimizations and x86 doesn't.

Also, turns out that these are very old samples, pretty much from 1 year ago. You can tell from the stepping, we're supposed to be on A2 now but the benchmarks are on A0.

Posted
Just now, patrickjp93 said:

Linpack, SAP, and plenty more exist. In fact Google has an entire benchmarking framework available open source.

Makes no sense then. I remember leaked benches of some AMD GPU's. They used Geekbench there too. Maybe that's the only graphical bench then? Idk, it's not important really. What is important is that people don't conclude IPC or performance or clock rate from this test.

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
5 minutes ago, rcarlos243 said:

I am comparing the single core performance so Hyperthreading is irrelevant.

That's not how hyperthreading works.

 

Test again and see the difference. Hyperthreading is an efficiency feature that will keep parts of the core busy between instructions with other (unrelated) instructions. Look it up.

 

Singlecore without hyperthreading = 1 thread

 

Singlecore with hyperthreading = 2 threads

\\ QUIET AUDIO WORKSTATION //

5960X 3.7GHz @ 0.983V / ASUS X99-A USB3.1      

32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws 4 & 2667MHz @ 1.2V

AMD R9 Fury X

256GB SM961 + 1TB Samsung 850 Evo  

Cooler Master Silencio 652S (soon Calyos NSG S0 ^^)              

Noctua NH-D15 / 3x NF-S12A                 

Seasonic PRIME Titanium 750W        

Logitech G810 Orion Spectrum / Logitech G900

2x Samsung S24E650BW 16:10  / Adam A7X / Fractal Axe Fx 2 Mark I

Windows 7 Ultimate

 

4K GAMING/EMULATION RIG

Xeon X5670 4.2Ghz (200BCLK) @ ~1.38V / Asus P6X58D Premium

12GB Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz

Gainward GTX 1080 Golden Sample

Intel 535 Series 240 GB + San Disk SSD Plus 512GB

Corsair Crystal 570X

Noctua NH-S12 

Be Quiet Dark Rock 11 650W

Logitech K830

Xbox One Wireless Controller

Logitech Z623 Speakers/Subwoofer

Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
48 minutes ago, rcarlos243 said:

 

 

I tried Geekbench4 with my Intel Core i7 6700K underclocked at 1.4Ghz with Turbo Boost Disabled

(...)

Now I overclocked my Intel Core i7 6700k clocked at 4.7Ghz with Turbo Boost Disabled

(...)

Assuming that other factors (RAM, etc) are equal or not relevant, hat makes the i7 9% faster at the same clock. It would be a very good result then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
35 minutes ago, Vode said:

You should have tried it with hyperthreadong disabled. The Zen ES had it disabled as well.

 

19 minutes ago, Agost said:

I think you should lower it as well... stock frequency is 4GHz

 

17 minutes ago, Vode said:

That's not how hyperthreading works.

 

Test again and see the difference. Hyperthreading is an efficiency feature that will keep parts of the core busy between instructions with other (unrelated) instructions. Look it up.

 

Singlecore without hyperthreading = 1 thread

 

Singlecore with hyperthreading = 2 threads

 

I made another test.

This time with Hyperthreading disabled and Uncore Frequency at 1.4Ghz

mDuqXpC.png

Yeah, we're all just a bunch of idiots experiencing nothing more than the placebo effect.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
5 minutes ago, rcarlos243 said:

 

 

 

I made another test.

This time with Hyperthreading disabled and Uncore Frequency at 1.4Ghz

Those are some really strange results .-. at least for the multi score, I thought HT would give a larger boost

However, that's still in the 10% difference range, which is expected for Zen vs Skylake

On a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
44 minutes ago, SpaceGhostC2C said:

Assuming that other factors (RAM, etc) are equal or not relevant, hat makes the i7 9% faster at the same clock. It would be a very good result then.

For server chips, the only major benchmarks that matter are Linpack, SAP, and the Google Benchmark Suite. Geekbench is far from comprehensive even for mobile users.

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
3 hours ago, MarcoTexture said:

impressive for 1.4 ghz. But but butttttt why did they benchmark it at that frequency? I mean what's the point?

Engineering samples, in particular early silicon, are clocked really low.

Intel i7 5820K (4.5 GHz) | MSI X99A MPower | 32 GB Kingston HyperX Fury 2666MHz | Asus RoG STRIX GTX 1080ti OC | Samsung 951 m.2 nVME 512GB | Crucial MX200 1000GB | Western Digital Caviar Black 2000GB | Noctua NH-D15 | Fractal Define R5 | Seasonic 860 Platinum | Logitech G910 | Sennheiser 599 | Blue Yeti | Logitech G502

 

Nikon D500 | Nikon 300mm f/4 PF  | Nikon 200-500 f/5.6 | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 | Tamron 70-210 f/4 VCII | Sigma 10-20 f/3.5 | Nikon 17-55 f/2.8 | Tamron 90mm F2.8 SP Di VC USD Macro | Neewer 750II

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
48 minutes ago, Agost said:

Those are some really strange results .-. at least for the multi score, I thought HT would give a larger boost

However, that's still in the 10% difference range, which is expected for Zen vs Skylake

For single core performance, HT will be irrelevant (possibly worse if you have many things running while benchmarking, but you shouldn't). 

 

For multi-threaded scores, HT can be irrelevant, positive ir negative, depending on what exact task the benchmark does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Unbenannt.PNG

 

cache is 32 blocks , so its def a 32c/64t cpu , i want that thing now , who needs quad core when you can have a triacontakaidigon core :P ? 

 

 

EDIT : it says "2 proccesors" so its 2 32c cpus on one board , like that dual cpu board shown off at amds press event 

RyzenAir : AMD R5 3600 | AsRock AB350M Pro4 | 32gb Aegis DDR4 3000 | GTX 1070 FE | Fractal Design Node 804
RyzenITX : Ryzen 7 1700 | GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI | 16gb DDR4 2666 | GTX 1060 | Cougar QBX 

 

PSU Tier list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

1.4ghzgb4.png

My Sandybridge i5 2410m does better single threaded??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
4 minutes ago, ScratchCat said:

My Sandybridge i5 2410m does better single threaded??

 

Take a better look at your test, it's boosting to 2.3 GHz.

On a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

delete this.

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 minute ago, Agost said:

Take a better look at your test, it's boosting to 2.3 GHz.

Check my newer post

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
Just now, patrickjp93 said:

Wrong! 2x processors means it's the same stats twice. SMT is disabled for the test.

oh , didnt see that , well then , 32c/64t it is 

RyzenAir : AMD R5 3600 | AsRock AB350M Pro4 | 32gb Aegis DDR4 3000 | GTX 1070 FE | Fractal Design Node 804
RyzenITX : Ryzen 7 1700 | GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI | 16gb DDR4 2666 | GTX 1060 | Cougar QBX 

 

PSU Tier list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 minute ago, ScratchCat said:

Check my newer post

Well that's kinda strange, there must be some bug somewhere

On a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 minute ago, Space Reptile said:

oh , didnt see that , well then , 32c/64t it is 

64C/64T...

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 minute ago, patrickjp93 said:

64C/64T...

 64c and only a score of like 15k? sheesh , lets hope ist related to the thing having no drivers 

RyzenAir : AMD R5 3600 | AsRock AB350M Pro4 | 32gb Aegis DDR4 3000 | GTX 1070 FE | Fractal Design Node 804
RyzenITX : Ryzen 7 1700 | GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI | 16gb DDR4 2666 | GTX 1060 | Cougar QBX 

 

PSU Tier list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 minute ago, Space Reptile said:

 64c and only a score of like 15k? sheesh , lets hope ist related to the thing having no drivers 

What's the usual score for 64c computers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
Just now, Space Reptile said:

 64c and only a score of like 15k? sheesh , lets hope ist related to the thing having no drivers 

Can I hit you with a bat?

 

DRIVERS?! IT'S A CPU BENCHMARK! CPUS DO NOT NEED NOR GET DRIVERS!

 

Also, it's at 1.44GHz on an engineering sample with A0 stepping. God people, just, just READ! That's all I'm asking of you...

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 minute ago, patrickjp93 said:

Can I hit you with a bat?

 

DRIVERS?! IT'S A CPU BENCHMARK! CPUS DO NOT NEED NOR GET DRIVERS!

 

Also, it's at 1.44GHz on an engineering sample with A0 stepping. God people, just, just READ! That's all I'm asking of you...

im talking OPTIMISATION , better/ newer bioses and drivers for the chipset will lead to better performance , in this early stage its pretty much running on training wheels 

RyzenAir : AMD R5 3600 | AsRock AB350M Pro4 | 32gb Aegis DDR4 3000 | GTX 1070 FE | Fractal Design Node 804
RyzenITX : Ryzen 7 1700 | GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI | 16gb DDR4 2666 | GTX 1060 | Cougar QBX 

 

PSU Tier list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
7 minutes ago, Space Reptile said:

im talking OPTIMISATION , better/ newer bioses and drivers for the chipset will lead to better performance , in this early stage its pretty much running on training wheels 

No, those literally do not affect performance.

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Tech News

×