Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**

[Jumper118]

[cortexcortex]

 

On my personal overclock (4.2GHz), could obviously push it higher.

 

 

[DildorTheDecent]

1 hour ago, cortexcortex said:

 

On my personal overclock (4.2GHz), could obviously push it higher.

need CPU-Z as well. 

[Stefan1024]

Got the mainboard today. As the system is now up and running I just had to bench it

 

 

EDIT: Sandy Bridge E is still rocking today!

[cortexcortex]

33 minutes ago, DildorTheDecent said:

need CPU-Z as well. 

Oh, sorry, updating post

[Jumper118]

6 minutes ago, cortexcortex said:

Oh, sorry, updating post

makes me sad to see a cpu like that running at stock

[cortexcortex]

Just now, Jumper118 said:

makes me sad to see a cpu like that running at stock

It's not running at stock though? I'm at 4.2 GHz

[Jumper118]

1 minute ago, cortexcortex said:

It's not running at stock though? I'm at 4.2 GHz

cpuz seems to show it running at stock

[cortexcortex]

Just now, Jumper118 said:

cpuz seems to show it running at stock

I took a picture while CPU-Z was at idle.. here you go;

 

 

[cortexcortex]

5 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

cpuz seems to show it running at stock

Also, as a side note, do you think my OC is any good? Getting good temps at full load (60-65 C), and 4.2GHz @ 1.160 V

[iHardware Shelden]

12 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

makes me sad to see a cpu like that running at stock

i7 4700MQ @ stock 2.4Ghz  

 

[Jumper118]

9 minutes ago, cortexcortex said:

Also, as a side note, do you think my OC is any good? Getting good temps at full load (60-65 C), and 4.2GHz @ 1.160 V

tbh iw ould run it faster than that. 4.4ghz would be minimum on a haswell based chip like that, because then you are getting the same performance as a stock 4790K with turbo on single thread apps

[cortexcortex]

5 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

tbh iw ould run it faster than that. 4.4ghz would be minimum on a haswell based chip like that, because then you are getting the same performance as a stock 4790K with turbo on single thread apps

Alright, got 4.4GHz stable with a higher temp under load but still kind of average, still on 1.160 V. What about now?

[agent_x007]

@Jumper118 @iHardware Shelden

Quote

You might want to find something... to hang on to

Pentium 4 670 @ 4GHz :
Cinebench 2003 :


Cinebench R11.5 (x64) :


R15 will be added later - I have to go sleep now (3AM where I live).

PS. But guys, I mean seriously... 
It's not THAT hard to get 4GHz out of Pentium 4 5xx/6xx

[iHardware Shelden]

2 minutes ago, agent_x007 said:

PS. But guys, I mean seriously... 
It's not THAT* hard to get 4GHz out of Pentium 4 5xx/6xx

Yea I don't know why but all mine don't like anything higher than 3.9 without gobs of voltage thrown at them  

[Dabombinable]

3 minutes ago, agent_x007 said:

@Jumper118 @iHardware Shelden

Pentium 4 670 @ 4GHz :
Cinebench 2003 :


Cinebench R11.5 (x64) :


R15 will be added later - I have to go sleep now (3AM where I live).

PS. But guys, I mean seriously... 
It's not THAT hard to get 4GHz out of Pentium 4 5xx/6xx

Tell that to my Seidon 120V. My Pentium 4 630 was murdering it at 3.8GHz..

[agent_x007]

19 minutes ago, Dabombinable said:

Tell that to my Seidon 120V. My Pentium 4 630 was murdering it at 3.8GHz..

I'm using BOX cooler (copper core, high profile), with standard Vcore
So either I have REALLY good chip, and/or U guys have... not "the good ones".
^That is possible (speed binning and all).

+ Prescott-2M lacks some performance, compared to P4EE (Gallatin) @ 4GHz.
What (which) : 670 vs. EE
2003 (Single) : 343pts vs. 400pts, (Multi) : 407pts vs. 475pts.
R11.5 (Single) : 0,56pts. vs. 0,62pts, (Multi) : 0,65pts. vs. 0,72pts.
P4 670 is running 64-bit version of R11.5 as well.

[iHardware Shelden]

4 hours ago, agent_x007 said:

I'm using BOX cooler (copper core, high profile), with standard Vcore
So either I have REALLY good chip, and/or U guys have... not "the good ones".
^That is possible (speed binning and all).

+ Prescott-2M lacks some performance, compared to P4EE (Gallatin) @ 4GHz.
What (which) : 670 vs. EE
2003 (Single) : 343pts vs. 400pts, (Multi) : 407pts vs. 475pts.
R11.5 (Single) : 0,56pts. vs. 0,62pts, (Multi) : 0,65pts. vs. 0,72pts.
P4 670 is running 64-bit version of R11.5 as well.

I think you just have amazing chips or my motherboard might have played a role in it or both ill get some more and see what happens

[iHardware Shelden]

@Jumper118  This is to keep you lonely Pentium II company on the 03 sheet  

 

 

 

[agent_x007]

Pentium 4 670 @ 4GHz Cinebench R15 results : 

And now 4,27GHz OC  :
2003 :


R11.5 :


R15 :


I used BOX cooling with Delta 3k on top, forcing air around NB and VRM areas (just to be safe).

Interesting things :
High HT speed up in R15 (27-28%), and lower result than P4 630 OC (3,9GHz vs. 4GHz P4 670).
I think they are both tied to relative slow FSB speed and low effective memory bandwidth.

PS. Can my results from FX-55 get side info that they are made using 130nm or "ClawHammer" version (because there is a 90nm version and that can do 3GHz no prob.)

[iHardware Shelden]

@Dabombinable Here you go   http://valid.x86.fr/x65aa1

 

 

 

[Dabombinable]

1 hour ago, iHardware Shelden said:

@Dabombinable Here you go   http://valid.x86.fr/x65aa1

 

 

 

You lucky SOB. I've only got Coppermine Pentium III. On the plus side, if you underclocked them to 1GHz (I do not want to stress my Abit VP6 out any more until I can get the caps replaced) it'd be interesting to do a modern side by side comparison, then to see the improvements with them at stock and eventually overclocked. Although I'd remove half of the RAM and we'd be using our FX5500 for the graphics benchmarks (I take it you don't have a Geforce 6200?).

[iHardware Shelden]

27 minutes ago, Dabombinable said:

You lucky SOB. I've only got Coppermine Pentium III. On the plus side, if you underclocked them to 1GHz (I do not want to stress my Abit VP6 out any more until I can get the caps replaced) it'd be interesting to do a modern side by side comparison, then to see the improvements with them at stock and eventually overclocked. Although I'd remove half of the RAM and we'd be using our FX5500 for the graphics benchmarks (I take it you don't have a Geforce 6200?).

I shall look through my AGP cards and let you know ill try underclocking also, got them up to 1.6Ghz so far though

[iHardware Shelden]

1 hour ago, Dabombinable said:

You lucky SOB. I've only got Coppermine Pentium III. On the plus side, if you underclocked them to 1GHz (I do not want to stress my Abit VP6 out any more until I can get the caps replaced) it'd be interesting to do a modern side by side comparison, then to see the improvements with them at stock and eventually overclocked. Although I'd remove half of the RAM and we'd be using our FX5500 for the graphics benchmarks (I take it you don't have a Geforce 6200?).

K so I got a Geforce3 TI 200, going to see what I can find at work Monday 

[Dabombinable]

Just now, iHardware Shelden said:

K so I got a Geforce3 TI 200, going to see what I can find at work Monday 

We could always my Riva TNT2 vs your Riva TNT2 M64.