Jump to content

To Buy or Not to Buy (a 980 Ti): That is the Question

Morgan Everett

A simple question: in your humble and expert opinion, should I buy a 980 Ti (for around £350), or wait for a 1070? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

980 Ti is faster than 1070 so just get it. Of course, everyone will tell you to wait for benchmarks, which wouldn't hurt.

CPU: AMD 5950X    MB: Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero    RAM: HyperX Predator 64GB    GPU: Nvidia RTX 3090 Ti FE    SSD: Seagate FireCuda 530 2TB    
PSU: EVGA 1200w P2    COOLING: EK AIO Elite 360    CASE: Fractal Design Torrent 
   DISPLAY: LG CX48 4k OLED    AUDIO: HIFIMAN Arya SE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lemme quote myself, and everyone here:

Wait for benchmarks pleeeeeeease!

Athlon X2 for only 27.31$   Best part lists at different price points   Windows 1.01 running natively on an Eee PC

My rig:

Spoiler

Celeronator (new main rig)

CPU: Intel Celeron (duh) N2840 2.16GHz Dual Core

RAM: 4GB DDR3 1333MHz

HDD: Seagate 500GB

GPU: Intel HD Graphics 3000 Series

Spoiler

Frankenhertz (ex main rig)

CPU: Intel Atom N2600 1.6GHz Dual Core

RAM: 1GB DDR3-800

HDD: HGST 320GB

GPU: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait. 

[CPU: 4.7ghz I5 6600k] [MBAsus Z170 Pro G] [RAM: G.Skill 2400 16GB(2x8)]

[GPU: MSI Twin Frozr GTX 970] [PSU: XFX Pro 850W] [Cooler: Hyper 212 Evo]
[Storage: 500GB WD HDD / 128GB SanDisk SSD ] [Case: DeepCool Tessaract]

[Keyboard: AZIO MGK1] [Mouse: Logitech G303] [Monitor: 2 x Acer 23" 1080p IPS]

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kryptyx said:

980 Ti is faster than 1070 so just get it.

Do you have a source for that? I'm genuinely curious, rather than suggesting you're wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, App4that said:

Wait for the benchmarks, but as a 980ti owner I'll tell you it's more than enough for any game at 1440. 

What I'm concerned about is the various mumblings about its DX12 performance. If we weren't in this transitional period, I'd have fewer misgivings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Morgan Everett said:

Do you have a source for that? I'm genuinely curious, rather than suggesting you're wrong. 

I don't have a source to link, but you'll see soon enough ;)

CPU: AMD 5950X    MB: Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero    RAM: HyperX Predator 64GB    GPU: Nvidia RTX 3090 Ti FE    SSD: Seagate FireCuda 530 2TB    
PSU: EVGA 1200w P2    COOLING: EK AIO Elite 360    CASE: Fractal Design Torrent 
   DISPLAY: LG CX48 4k OLED    AUDIO: HIFIMAN Arya SE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Morgan Everett said:

What I'm concerned about is the various mumblings about its DX12 performance. If we weren't in this transitional period, I'd have fewer misgivings. 

I have yet to encounter any problems in DX12 games. I run Forza 6 maxed out at 4K with a locked 60fps, while the Fury X struggles at 1440 and can't even try the game at 4K because of its memory limitation. Do not believe the fear mongering done by AMD fans. 

If anyone asks you never saw me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, App4that said:

Don't believe the fear mongering done by AMD fans. 

FTFY.

CPU: AMD 5950X    MB: Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero    RAM: HyperX Predator 64GB    GPU: Nvidia RTX 3090 Ti FE    SSD: Seagate FireCuda 530 2TB    
PSU: EVGA 1200w P2    COOLING: EK AIO Elite 360    CASE: Fractal Design Torrent 
   DISPLAY: LG CX48 4k OLED    AUDIO: HIFIMAN Arya SE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Kryptyx said:

I don't have a source to link, but you'll see soon enough ;)

Very cryptic!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Morgan Everett said:

A simple question: in your humble and expert opinion, should I buy a 980 Ti (for around £350), or wait for a 1070? 

£350 for a GTX 980Ti in the UK is an absolute steal. 

 

I'd take it tbh. Wait for 2nd gen Pascal. 

Our Grace. The Feathered One. He shows us the way. His bob is majestic and shows us the path. Follow unto his guidance and His example. He knows the one true path. Our Saviour. Our Grace. Our Father Birb has taught us with His humble heart and gentle wing the way of the bob. Let us show Him our reverence and follow in His example. The True Path of the Feathered One. ~ Dimboble-dubabob III

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DildorTheDecent said:

£350 for a GTX 980Ti in the UK is an absolute steal. 

 

I'd take it tbh. Wait for 2nd gen Pascal. 

The price is what's making it so tempting. But I'll be a bit gutted if the 1070 is released next month for less money and better performance...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very unlikely a 1070 will beat a 980ti. Remember the 980ti is tested at its reference speed. Mine goes to 1500mhz

If anyone asks you never saw me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, App4that said:

Very unlikely a 1070 will beat a 980ti. Remember the 980ti is tested at its reference speed. Mine goes to 1500mhz

Why do you think that's unlikely? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

350 is a damn good deal for a 980ti. 

CPU i7 6700k MB  MSI Z170A Pro Carbon GPU Zotac GTX980Ti amp!extreme RAM 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance 3k CASE Corsair 760T PSU Corsair RM750i MOUSE Logitech G9x KB Logitech G910 HS Sennheiser GSP 500 SC Asus Xonar 7.1 MONITOR Acer Predator xb270hu Storage 1x1TB + 2x500GB Samsung 7200U/m - 2x500GB SSD Samsung 850EVO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Morgan Everett said:

Why do you think that's unlikely? 

Cuda cores. The 1080 does it through clock speed, not physical performance. Even the memory bus is larger on the 980ti. But the 1070, way down on Cuda cores. It is very unlikely it will catch a overclocked 980ti. Remember they use a overclocked 1080 and a reference Titan X to get the disparity they show. In any other venue that would be called out.

If anyone asks you never saw me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tbh though cuda core count doesn't have anywhere close to the impact on performance that GPU clock speed does, so an overclocked 1070 may still outperform a 980 ti.

Linus is my fetish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Morgan Everett said:

Why do you think that's unlikely? 

Because the 970 couldn't beat a GX780ti out of the box, it needed to be heavily overclocked.

I personally compared a ROG GTX780ti Matrix OC's to a Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming OC'd and the 780ti beat it, it came close to a reference GTX980 which beat it by about 5 - 7%, but couldn't get anywhere near a GTX980ti.

 

Hasn't anyone noticed they left the GTX980ti off the launch graph, there's a reason for that, the 1080 isn't meant to replace the GTX980ti, the 1080Ti is.

This is the same hype train NVIDIA did for Maxwell, and it will be the same for future card releases.

 

I know people who are still gaming with a GTX680 fine, so honestly unless you're gaming at stupidly high resolutions the GTX980ti will last you at least 2 years or until the next NVIDIA architecture drops, this is mainly due most games are console ported.

 

Heck my wife is gaming on a 2560x1080 widescreen monitor with a R9 270, she plays stuff like WWE 2k16, The Sims 4, few older titles like Deadpool, and they all run fine, heck I can max out WWE 2k16.

 

Update:

Just gave Doom a quick run, never dropped below 120fps on my single GTX980ti, so the fact that NVIDIA used that game to showcase the power of the 1080 surprises me...lol..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Schoolofmonkey said:

Because the 970 couldn't beat a GX780ti out of the box, it needed to be heavily overclocked.

I personally compared a ROG GTX780ti Matrix OC's to a Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming OC'd and the 780ti beat it, it came close to a reference GTX980 which beat it by about 5 - 7%, but couldn't get anywhere near a GTX980ti.

 

Hasn't anyone noticed they left the GTX980ti off the launch graph, there's a reason for that, the 1080 isn't meant to replace the GTX980ti, the 1080Ti is.

This is the same hype train NVIDIA did for Maxwell, and it will be the same for future card releases.

 

I know people who are still gaming with a GTX680 fine, so honestly unless you're gaming at stupidly high resolutions the GTX980ti will last you at least 2 years or until the next NVIDIA architecture drops, this is mainly due most games are console ported.

 

Heck my wife is gaming on a 2560x1080 widescreen monitor with a R9 270, she plays stuff like WWE 2k16, The Sims 4, few older titles like Deadpool, and they all run fine, heck I can max out WWE 2k16.

 

Update:

Just gave Doom a quick run, never dropped below 120fps on my single GTX980ti, so the fact that NVIDIA used that game to showcase the power of the 1080 surprises me...lol..

Great break down. My wife games on a 970m, she has a blast. I really can't wait for the benchmarks to hit. My only concern honestly is numbers AMD can't match. If Nvidia runs away with it nothing good can come of it.

If anyone asks you never saw me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Schoolofmonkey said:

Because the 970 couldn't beat a GX780ti out of the box, it needed to be heavily overclocked.

I personally compared a ROG GTX780ti Matrix OC's to a Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming OC'd and the 780ti beat it, it came close to a reference GTX980 which beat it by about 5 - 7%, but couldn't get anywhere near a GTX980ti.

 

Hasn't anyone noticed they left the GTX980ti off the launch graph, there's a reason for that, the 1080 isn't meant to replace the GTX980ti, the 1080Ti is.

This is the same hype train NVIDIA did for Maxwell, and it will be the same for future card releases.

 

I know people who are still gaming with a GTX680 fine, so honestly unless you're gaming at stupidly high resolutions the GTX980ti will last you at least 2 years or until the next NVIDIA architecture drops, this is mainly due most games are console ported.

 

Heck my wife is gaming on a 2560x1080 widescreen monitor with a R9 270, she plays stuff like WWE 2k16, The Sims 4, few older titles like Deadpool, and they all run fine, heck I can max out WWE 2k16.

 

Update:

Just gave Doom a quick run, never dropped below 120fps on my single GTX980ti, so the fact that NVIDIA used that game to showcase the power of the 1080 surprises me...lol..

Great post.

 

I'm on triple 1440p surround. One 980Ti isn't going to cut that.


So I'm going for two 980Ti Strix OC'd (and soon for three!)

 

I'm not rushing out to buy a 1070. Or a 1080.

 

My next buy will be 1080Ti and not before.

My Rig "Valiant"  Intel® Core™ i7-5930 @3.5GHz ; Asus X99 DELUXE 3.1 ; Corsair H110i ; Corsair Dominator Platinium 64GB 3200MHz CL16 DDR4 ; 2 x 6GB ASUS NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 980 Ti Strix ; Corsair Obsidian Series 900D ; Samsung 950 Pro NVME + Samsung 850 Pro SATA + HDD Western Digital Black - 2TB ; Corsair AX1500i Professional 80 PLUS Titanium ; x3 Samsung S27D850T 27-Inch WQHD Monitor
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Morgan Everett said:

A simple question: in your humble and expert opinion, should I buy a 980 Ti (for around £350), or wait for a 1070? 

I had to do a conversion to USD (which is $500). Given that the 1080 is $599 MSRP, I'd say this is a good deal. However it might drop a little bit more. 

The 1070 will be $379, and if the 780ti vs the 970/980 is any indication, the 1070 will be a little slower / on par with the 980ti at an aggressive price. In an ideal world, it would go 1070 > 980ti > 1080. This is close to what it is, so regards to price, I feel $400-$450 to be the correct price for 980ti.

I have the 980ti and I'm still happy with it, even at 1440p it gets over 60fps in most games (unless you turn on nvidia works in games like the division). An overclocked 980ti is probably within 10-15% of a 1080, but then again you can overclock the 1080 to obscene heights, apparently.

The marketing mumbo jumbo about "50% faster" is misleading. its 50% faster in VR. in normal 3D gaming its 20-30%, possibly more, but we'll know when benchmarks drop in the coming weeks.

TLDR; Great deal, Great card, it couldn't hurt to wait a little for a price drop. I suspect the 980ti to be a little faster than the 1070.

 

Monitor: ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q
GPU: MSI 980Ti Twin Frozr C/M:1470/7500
CPU: Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4.5Ghz
Case: Corsair 750D
Keyboard: Corsair K65 Cherry Red
Mouse: Logitech G70 Spectrum
Headset: Corsair Void

RAM: 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 2666mhz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, evilsliwa said:

I had to do a conversion to USD (which is $500). Given that the 1080 is $599 MSRP, I'd say this is a good deal. However it might drop a little bit more. 

The 1070 will be $379, and if the 780ti vs the 970/980 is any indication, the 1070 will be a little slower / on par with the 980ti at an aggressive price. In an ideal world, it would go 1070 > 980ti > 1080. This is close to what it is, so regards to price, I feel $400-$450 to be the correct price for 980ti.

I have the 980ti and I'm still happy with it, even at 1440p it gets over 60fps in most games (unless you turn on nvidia works in games like the division). An overclocked 980ti is probably within 10-15% of a 1080, but then again you can overclock the 1080 to obscene heights, apparently.

The marketing mumbo jumbo about "50% faster" is misleading. its 50% faster in VR. in normal 3D gaming its 20-30%, possibly more, but we'll know when benchmarks drop in the coming weeks.

TLDR; Great deal, Great card, it couldn't hurt to wait a little for a price drop. I suspect the 980ti to be a little faster than the 1070.

 

Thanks for this. Bear in mind that since GPUs cost more here (RRP is much higher), it's actually probably an even better deal than it appears to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say wait for benchmarking to come out, nvidia claims the 1070 also outperforms the titan so it might be less powerful than the 980ti but it will still have more Vram, we can only speculate until we see benchmarking with temps and clock speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eh, I couldn't wait a month. Got it for 350. And I too only have a 1080p monitor!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×