Jump to content

Wtf is the "nm" process with GPUs? [SOLVED]

Tim Drake

The space between transistors on a silcone die.

 

Smaller measn faster jumps in the gaps, but also means they get hotter.  (Edit: Gets cooler).

 

OR Band Gap.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Band_gap :)

 

Things like 14nm beat the current 28nm dies and would be VASTY superior but eventually gets to a point where the gap becomes too small and the electrons jump randomly, then Quantum Physics come into play but that's another story. :D

Regular human bartender...Jackie Daytona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

nm stands for nanometer. Basically is the precision that the manufacturing process can hold while making the chips.

LTT Unigine SUPERPOSITION scoreboardhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

Intel i7 8700k || ASUS Z370-I ITX || AMD Radeon VII || 16GB 4266mhz DDR4 || Silverstone 800W SFX-L || 512GB 950 PRO M.2 + 3.5TB of storage SSD's

SCHIIT Lyr 3 Multibit || HiFiMAN HE-1000 V2 || MrSpeakers Ether C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The space between transistors on a silcone die.

 

Smaller measn faster jumps in the gaps, but also means they get hotter.

 

OR Band Gap.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Band_gap :)

 

 

nm stands for nanometer. Basically is the precision that the manufacturing process can hold while making the chips.

 

 

It's how big gates and stuff are. The smaller they are the less time it takes for electricity to move through it -> faster.

Thnx gais

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The space between transistors on a silcone die.

 

Smaller measn faster jumps in the gaps, but also means they get hotter.

 

OR Band Gap.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Band_gap :)

 

Things like 14nm beat the current 28nm dies and would be VASTY superior but eventually gets to a point where the gap becomes too small and the electrons jump randomly, then Quantum Physics come into play but that's another story. :D

Wrong. Smaller means cooler. Ask any studied engineer.

It results in shorter reaction times of transistors and therefore shorter times in which your circuit shorts--> and heats up. It is to complicated for me to explain it in english because this is not my native language. But trust me this is it...

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/334934-unofficial-ltt-beginners-guide/ (by Minibois) and a few things that will make our community interaction more pleasent:
1. FOLLOW your own topics                                                                                2.Try to QUOTE people so we can read through things easier
3.Use
PCPARTPICKER.COM - easy and most importantly approved here        4.Mark your topics SOLVED if they are                                
Don't change a running system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong. Smaller means cooler. Ask any studied engineer.

That's what I thought considering Maxwell was much cooler than anything AMD had because of the nm process, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought considering Maxwell was much cooler than anything AMD had because of the nm process, right?

Maxwell is on the same nm process as AMD's cards.

LTT Unigine SUPERPOSITION scoreboardhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

Intel i7 8700k || ASUS Z370-I ITX || AMD Radeon VII || 16GB 4266mhz DDR4 || Silverstone 800W SFX-L || 512GB 950 PRO M.2 + 3.5TB of storage SSD's

SCHIIT Lyr 3 Multibit || HiFiMAN HE-1000 V2 || MrSpeakers Ether C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong. Smaller means cooler. Ask any studied engineer.

 

Really? I though small jumps with electrons would increase the temps on the small dies?

 

Or am I just having a Friday melt down lol

Regular human bartender...Jackie Daytona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone explain the nm process to me?

I don't understand it at all..

 

Like people say the smaller the better but idek what it is.

This video clears it up pretty well ... 

 

 

Also GPU cores use the 28nm transistors because it's different from your CPU ... It has hundreds , even thousands of cores and you certainly wouldn't want then to be that small with many cores around it ...

 

Don't worry though , 14nm is coming this year or next year ( I think it's with Arctic Island and Pascal )...

... Life is a game and the checkpoints are your birthday , you will face challenges where you may not get rewarded afterwords but those are the challenges that help you improve yourself . Always live for tomorrow because you may never know when your game will be over ... I'm totally not going insane in anyway , shape or form ... I just have broken English and an open mind ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? I though small jumps with electrons would increase the temps on the small dies?

 

Or am I just having a Friday melt down lol

 

The smaller process means it takes less energy to complete the circuit, but because the chip is fundamentally smaller it heats up faster with the same amount of energy flowing through it.

LTT Unigine SUPERPOSITION scoreboardhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

Intel i7 8700k || ASUS Z370-I ITX || AMD Radeon VII || 16GB 4266mhz DDR4 || Silverstone 800W SFX-L || 512GB 950 PRO M.2 + 3.5TB of storage SSD's

SCHIIT Lyr 3 Multibit || HiFiMAN HE-1000 V2 || MrSpeakers Ether C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought considering Maxwell was much cooler than anything AMD had because of the nm process, right?

Yes exactly,

smaller means less capacity in the transistors and faster reversing of polarities resulting in less time for the circuit that it is shorted and less heat... OK it was easier than I thought :P

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/334934-unofficial-ltt-beginners-guide/ (by Minibois) and a few things that will make our community interaction more pleasent:
1. FOLLOW your own topics                                                                                2.Try to QUOTE people so we can read through things easier
3.Use
PCPARTPICKER.COM - easy and most importantly approved here        4.Mark your topics SOLVED if they are                                
Don't change a running system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maxwell is on the same nm process as AMD's cards.

NO

Just ... no

GCN is totaly different fromw what NVIDIA does and GCN 1.2, the one currently used is 22nm if I am not mistakeing.

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/334934-unofficial-ltt-beginners-guide/ (by Minibois) and a few things that will make our community interaction more pleasent:
1. FOLLOW your own topics                                                                                2.Try to QUOTE people so we can read through things easier
3.Use
PCPARTPICKER.COM - easy and most importantly approved here        4.Mark your topics SOLVED if they are                                
Don't change a running system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought considering Maxwell was much cooler than anything AMD had because of the nm process, right?

No both Nvidia and AMD have been using the 28nm process since 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? I though small jumps with electrons would increase the temps on the small dies?

 

Or am I just having a Friday melt down lol

What do you mean by jumping electrons?

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/334934-unofficial-ltt-beginners-guide/ (by Minibois) and a few things that will make our community interaction more pleasent:
1. FOLLOW your own topics                                                                                2.Try to QUOTE people so we can read through things easier
3.Use
PCPARTPICKER.COM - easy and most importantly approved here        4.Mark your topics SOLVED if they are                                
Don't change a running system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No both Nvidia and AMD have been using the 28nm process since 2012.

DERP...

sry I brainfarted again.

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/334934-unofficial-ltt-beginners-guide/ (by Minibois) and a few things that will make our community interaction more pleasent:
1. FOLLOW your own topics                                                                                2.Try to QUOTE people so we can read through things easier
3.Use
PCPARTPICKER.COM - easy and most importantly approved here        4.Mark your topics SOLVED if they are                                
Don't change a running system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO

Just ... no

GCN is totaly different fromw what NVIDIA does and GCN 1.2, the one currently used is 22nm if I am not mistakeing.

I didn't say the core design was the same, but that the precision level of the manufacturing of the cores was the same. They are both at 28nm.

LTT Unigine SUPERPOSITION scoreboardhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

Intel i7 8700k || ASUS Z370-I ITX || AMD Radeon VII || 16GB 4266mhz DDR4 || Silverstone 800W SFX-L || 512GB 950 PRO M.2 + 3.5TB of storage SSD's

SCHIIT Lyr 3 Multibit || HiFiMAN HE-1000 V2 || MrSpeakers Ether C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The smaller process means it takes less energy to complete the circuit, but because the chip is fundamentally smaller it heats up faster with the same amount of energy flowing through it.

If all architecture was using the same amount of power you would be right but you are not.

The power needed to run a circuit decreases with size and therefore you assumption is not correct.

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/334934-unofficial-ltt-beginners-guide/ (by Minibois) and a few things that will make our community interaction more pleasent:
1. FOLLOW your own topics                                                                                2.Try to QUOTE people so we can read through things easier
3.Use
PCPARTPICKER.COM - easy and most importantly approved here        4.Mark your topics SOLVED if they are                                
Don't change a running system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't say the core design was the same, but that the precision level of the manufacturing of the cores was the same. They are both at 28nm.

Yes I already admitted that. I am sorry for presenting wrong facts in this case. I can't remember what my brain was doing then... msut have been something stupid sry :D

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/334934-unofficial-ltt-beginners-guide/ (by Minibois) and a few things that will make our community interaction more pleasent:
1. FOLLOW your own topics                                                                                2.Try to QUOTE people so we can read through things easier
3.Use
PCPARTPICKER.COM - easy and most importantly approved here        4.Mark your topics SOLVED if they are                                
Don't change a running system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the full details but the efficient memory compression scheme is what makes maxwell run generally cooler lower TDP and lower power consumption compared to AMD. Something to do with the delta color compression from what I remember when maxwell was announced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If all architecture was using the same amount of power you would be right but you are not.

The power needed to run a circuit decreases with size and therefore you assumption is not correct.

We both just said the same thing, lol.

 

100W running a chip at 28nm will be converted to the same temperature increase as 100W at 14nm, but because there is less material used in the smaller process it takes less time for it to increase. Unless I have forgotten something from Thermodynamics I believe this is how it works.

LTT Unigine SUPERPOSITION scoreboardhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

Intel i7 8700k || ASUS Z370-I ITX || AMD Radeon VII || 16GB 4266mhz DDR4 || Silverstone 800W SFX-L || 512GB 950 PRO M.2 + 3.5TB of storage SSD's

SCHIIT Lyr 3 Multibit || HiFiMAN HE-1000 V2 || MrSpeakers Ether C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you mean by jumping electrons?

 

There are bridges between gates which eletrons hop over, the small those gaps get the easier it is for "loose" eletrons to jump without being told too.

 

The small these Die processes become the harder it is to control them although we can up until it hits 7 to 4nm> we should be okay after that It moves onto Quantum mechanics which is a whole other ball game.

Regular human bartender...Jackie Daytona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

We both just said the same thing, lol.

 

100W running a chip at 28nm will be converted to the same temperature increase as 100W at 14nm, but because there is less material used in the smaller process it takes less time for it to increase. Unless I have forgotten something from Thermodynamics I believe this is how it works.

Like induction heating? 

Regular human bartender...Jackie Daytona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like induction heating? 

 

I'm not really sure that they are similar. Induction heating uses an electrically produced magnetic field to heat metals, but with cpus its the electricity flowing through the metal itself that creates the heat. I'm just kind of generalizing, but if you think of the chip as 1 big resistor all of that energy that the cpu draws in to make calculations gets converted to heat. So if 100W is converted, the chip with the smaller amount of material will have a higher energy density and will get hotter faster, all with the same total amount of heat being produced.

 

Hopefully I'm not fully talking out of my ass, someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

LTT Unigine SUPERPOSITION scoreboardhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

Intel i7 8700k || ASUS Z370-I ITX || AMD Radeon VII || 16GB 4266mhz DDR4 || Silverstone 800W SFX-L || 512GB 950 PRO M.2 + 3.5TB of storage SSD's

SCHIIT Lyr 3 Multibit || HiFiMAN HE-1000 V2 || MrSpeakers Ether C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not really sure that they are similar. Induction heating uses an electrically produced magnetic field to heat metals, but with cpus its the electricity flowing through the metal itself that creates the heat. I'm just kind of generalizing, but if you think of the chip as 1 big resistor all of that energy that the cpu draws in to make calculations gets converted to heat. So if 100W is converted, the chip with the smaller amount of material will have a higher energy density and will get hotter faster, all with the same total amount of heat being produced.

 

Hopefully I'm not fully talking out of my ass, someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

Yeah no idea why I said induction heating...lol

 

But yeah, I hope the new 14/16nm process will give the 2012 one a kick in the stones. 

Regular human bartender...Jackie Daytona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×