Jump to content

Proof the Solar Roadways are bull **** for the third time. (EEVBlog)

Original source:



 


Recently the Solar Road test built in the Netherlands came out with data containing results of the amount of energy produced in a 6 month period,


and the company is claiming it produced more than they expected. That's all well and good, with major tech blogs posting about it,


(such as Engadget).


But when you break down the figures, they not as impressive as you would have thought.


 


Ever since Solar Roadways have been considered, Dave from the EEVBlog on YouTube has smelled something off about the project,


and if it is worth it.


Naturally as a follow up, he has decided to do a 3rd video with the findings to see if it was worth it, and the TL;DR answer,


No, not really.


 


In his video he breaks down the calculations, and does comparisons between smaller solar generators in the same area to see what they were achieving.


After collecting the information and compared to the Solar Road, it doesn't look that impressive any more.


 


His workings, provided by Dave himself,


SolaRoadsResultsCalcs.png

 


His previous videos in the spoiler below


 




 



 




 


My thoughts.


I liked the concept of solar roads, but I somehow feel they will never be efficient enough (At the current moment, given 5 years or so, who knows, but right now...)  to warrant the cost of creating and fitting the panels.


It was a great idea, but I feel its either too soon or the advancements are just not there yet.


 


Your thoughts, please leave them down below!


Ryze of the Phoenix: 
CPU:      AMD Ryzen 5 3600 @ 4.15GHz
Ram:      64GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 @ 3200Mhz (Samsung B-Die & Nanya Technology)
GPU:      MSI RTX 3060 12GB Aero ITX
Storage: Crucial P3 1TB NVMe Gen 4 SSD, 1TB Crucial MX500, Spinning Rust (7TB Internal, 16TB External - All in-use),
PSU:      Cooler Master MWE Gold 750w V2 PSU (Thanks LTT PSU Tier List)
Cooler:   BeQuite! Prue Rock 2 Black Edition
Case:     ThermalTake Versa J22 TG

Passmark 10 Score: 6096.4         CPU-z Score: 4189 MT         Unigine Valley (DX11 @1080p Ultra): 5145         CryEngine Neon Noir (1080p Ultra): 9579

Audio Setup:                  Scarlett 2i2, AudioTechnica AT2020 XLR, Mackie CR3 Monitors, Sennheiser HD559 headphones, HyperX Cloud II Headset, KZ ES4 IEM (Cyan)

Laptop:                            MacBook Pro 2017 (Intel i5 7360U, 8GB DDR3, 128GB SSD, 2x Thunderbolt 3 Ports - No Touch Bar) Catalina & Boot Camp Win10 Pro

Primary Phone:               Xiaomi Mi 11T Pro 5G 256GB (Snapdragon 888)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts are these:

 

This was never meant to be the final product. It was a test to see if it worked.

Technology, including solar, evolves all the time.

 

Stay tuned.

The projects never end in my line of work.

CPU: Dual Xeon E5-2650v2 || GPU: Dual Quadro K5000 || Motherboard: Asus Z9PE-D8 || RAM: 64GB Corsair Vengeance || Monitors: Dual LG 34UM95, NEC MultiSync EA244UHD || Storage: Dual Samsung 850 Pro 256GB in Raid 0, 6x WD Re 4TB in Raid 1 || Sound: Xonar Essense STX (Mainly for Troubleshooting and listening test) || PSU: Corsair Ax1500i

CPU: Core i7 5820k @ 4.7GHz || GPU: Dual Titan X || Motherboard: Asus X99 Deluxe || RAM: 32GB Crucial Ballistix Sport || Monitors: MX299Q, 29UB65, LG 34UM95 || Storage: Dual Samsung 850 EVO 1 TB in Raid 0, Samsung 850 EVO 250GB, 2TB Toshiba scratch disk, 3TB Seagate Barracuda || PSU: EVGA 1000w PS Platinum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've made several posts in the past explaining how it's a nice concept but completely uneconomical at our current stage of tech and infrastructure.  
 

In other words, would not invest in lol.

Like watching Anime? Consider joining the unofficial LTT Anime Club Heaven Society~ ^.^

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another EEVBlog fan! :)

I like the way Dave tackles the problem and does the calculations.

 

Just another proof that solar power is not the best solution at the moment.

 

Spoiler

CPU:Intel Xeon X5660 @ 4.2 GHz RAM:6x2 GB 1600MHz DDR3 MB:Asus P6T Deluxe GPU:Asus GTX 660 TI OC Cooler:Akasa Nero 3


SSD:OCZ Vertex 3 120 GB HDD:2x640 GB WD Black Fans:2xCorsair AF 120 PSU:Seasonic 450 W 80+ Case:Thermaltake Xaser VI MX OS:Windows 10
Speakers:Altec Lansing MX5021 Keyboard:Razer Blackwidow 2013 Mouse:Logitech MX Master Monitor:Dell U2412M Headphones: Logitech G430

Big thanks to Damikiller37 for making me an awesome Intel 4004 out of trixels!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOOK AT THAT NECK (In the video thumbnail)

Nude Fist 1: i5-4590-ASRock h97 Anniversary-16gb Samsung 1333mhz-MSI GTX 970-Corsair 300r-Seagate HDD(s)-EVGA SuperNOVA 750b2

Name comes from anagramed sticker for "TUF Inside" (A sticker that came with my original ASUS motherboard)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've made several posts in the past explaining how it's a nice concept but completely uneconomical at our current stage of tech and infrastructure.  

 

In other words, would not invest in lol.

Technology isn't going to make solar roadways economical. An angled solar panel will always be more effective than a flat laying one. 

Molex to SATA, lose all your data

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6:00 - 6:17 how I feel about every PC tech news article on the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am student in civil engeneering and I knew this was bullshit 10 sec into the vid when it came out. The fact that people beleived this to be feasable is a non-sense to me.

Case : Corsiar Air 540 CPU : Intel i5 8600k GPU : Asus Nvidia 970 DirectCUII RAM : 16gb DDR4 MB : ASUS Prime z370-p PSU : OCZ Modxtreme 700w SSD : Samsung 840 EVO 250gb 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technology isn't going to make solar roadways economical. An angled solar panel will always be more effective than a flat laying one. 

I will have to disagree good sir, if the technology behind the product is feasible and can make good returns on money spent then it'll easily become economical. 

 

Angled solar panels are more effective than a flat laying one yes, but efficiency isn't the only thing were looking at. I'm a solar stock specialist so when were talking about solar panel tech my ears perk up. 

Like watching Anime? Consider joining the unofficial LTT Anime Club Heaven Society~ ^.^

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

this may be OK for a bike path but...

 

this tech simply would not work for a car road. You can't generate power when vehicles are covering the surface. Maintenance costs alone would not make it feasible in the long term.

2017 Macbook Pro 15 inch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have to disagree good sir, if the technology behind the product is feasible and can make good returns on money spent then it'll easily become economical. 

 

Angled solar panels are more effective than a flat laying one yes, but efficiency isn't the only thing were looking at. I'm a solar stock specialist so when were talking about solar panel tech my ears perk up. 

But why would you put solar panels in a place where they're less effective. You'd need to replace the glass on top of them all the time, which has a lot more slippery than regular tarmac by the way. And don't get me started about the stupid idea of putting led on these panels. 

Molex to SATA, lose all your data

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

But why would you put solar panels in a place where they're less effective. You'd need to replace the glass on top of them all the time, which has a lot more slippery than regular tarmac by the way. And don't get me started about the stupid idea of putting led on these panels. 

If the technology on the panels used for this purpose operates differently than your traditional commercial solar panel then it could be effective(pricing is important too). You don't necessarily need to use glass, glass itself sounds like a horrible idea for something that's going to be run over thousands of times per day by 2 ton vehicles.... 

 

Like I said the tech we have now is no able to make this stuff economically viable. I wouldn't invest in it but it does have the potential to one day be effective if the tech is good enough and cost effective. 

Like watching Anime? Consider joining the unofficial LTT Anime Club Heaven Society~ ^.^

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the technology on the panels used for this purpose operates differently than your traditional commercial solar panel then it could be effective(pricing is important too). You don't necessarily need to use glass, glass itself sounds like a horrible idea for something that's going to be run over thousands of times per day by 2 ton vehicles.... 

 

Like I said the tech we have now is no able to make this stuff economically viable. I wouldn't invest in it but it does have the potential to one day be effective if the tech is good enough and cost effective. 

I get your point. With panels whose performance isn't affected by the angle the panel is positioned,this might work, If we can manufacture it cheap enough. You would still need a translucent material with excellent frictional properties, though. Using glass as a cover for the panels was proposed by the makers of the Indiegogo campaign, as well as putting leds on the panels. 

Molex to SATA, lose all your data

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts are these:

 

This was never meant to be the final product. It was a test to see if it worked.

Technology, including solar, evolves all the time.

 

Stay tuned.

^this

Ketchup is better than mustard.

GUI is better than Command Line Interface.

Dubs are better than subs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technology isn't going to make solar roadways economical. An angled solar panel will always be more effective than a flat laying one. 

Not remotely true if you have a handle on Quantum Mechanics. The problem is that's on the bleeding edge of research, much less application.

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was only the first test. They still need to refine the product.

 

The thing is the power that is generated from solar roads is better than nothing at all. 

 

It is a unique approach to creating clean energy and IMHO a great utilization of space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way I see solar being implemented in the near future, is on rooftops with batteries like tesla is doing. Solar roads are stupid, period, they will never be the cheaper option to harness solar energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter how efficient solar power technology becomes unideal placement of solar panels will always be less efficient than ideal placement of solar panels. Did you guys see him show the solar road with the solar panels on poles in the center of the highway? That would be ideal placement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotta love Dave. As a fellow engineer, it is nice to see him pointing out the flaws in the design and implementation.

 

But, I will say this: Although the current implementation is not practical (it never was to begin with), it at least is a start. Sometimes projects like these go through numerous development cycles, research, and analysis. Some of that involves putting them to the test in the real world.

 

While it isn't an efficient implementation, we may be saying the exact opposite 10 years from now. It is all part of the process of R&D. Eventually, the technology will catch up, and it may be viable in the future.

▶ Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Einstein◀

Please remember to mark a thread as solved if your issue has been fixed, it helps other who may stumble across the thread at a later point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine we covering our roads with solar panels like the Koreans did ... That would be amazing ... 

... Life is a game and the checkpoints are your birthday , you will face challenges where you may not get rewarded afterwords but those are the challenges that help you improve yourself . Always live for tomorrow because you may never know when your game will be over ... I'm totally not going insane in anyway , shape or form ... I just have broken English and an open mind ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Daves bullshit videos are always funny!

Surprised others know about him.

Who doesn't know about that crazy Austrian Aussie bloke.

It's always good to see Dave throwing some math in the face of BS.

The stars died for you to be here today.

A locked bathroom in the right place can make all the difference in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's not disappointing considering the roadway is used, gets dirty and is on the floor instead of an angle at which the roof panels probably are. sooo it's not too bad. 

Computing enthusiast. 
I use to be able to input a cheat code now I've got to input a credit card - Total Biscuit
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×