Intel Core i7-5775C and Core i5-5675C

[patrickjp93]

so are these the 4770k/4790k and 4760k/4690k equivalent for 5th gen? or is there something more to come? is the 5775C going to be the TOTL 5th gen non enthusiast.

These are not 4790K replacements, and I had some doubt they'll overclock to those levels. These are more high-performance chips with enough iGPU to go toe to toe with Kaveri and Carrizo with low enough TDP to be attractive to HTPC builders and SFF makers.

[XYrZbest]

These are not 4790K replacements, and I had some doubt they'll overclock to those levels. These are more high-performance chips with enough iGPU to go toe to toe with Kaveri and Carrizo with low enough TDP to be attractive to HTPC builders and SFF makers.

so there will still be 5770k and 5670k to come?

[MageTank]

so there will still be 5770k and 5670k to come?

Skylake looks to be the true successor to Haswell, broadwell is just a lower TDP variant, it is not meant to replace current haswell CPU's.

[arnavvr]

WE HAVE TO HOPE FOR ZEN!!!!

[Opcode]

They both are slower than Haswell on the CPU side and are still weaksauce in comparison to Kaveri on the iGPU side. Broadwell was pretty much a dummy architecture for Intel to work out the kinks and bugs in their 14nm FinFET process. I doubt we will see any more than just these two skews for the desktop for that very reason. It seems like Cherry Trail is the only thing that Intel is pushing out on their 14nm node that's of any interest. Just launch the x5-Z8500 for dirt cheap already.

[vm'N]

Lots of hands-on experience dealing with latency problems to my school's supercomputer which services people all over the country.

Load-balancing in real time for routing goes wrong all the time because of the very nature of Internet usage spiking and ebbing seemingly without explanation. Single packets can get thrown all over the place because of those behaviors. Also, no, they query out very often to make sure those routers are alive and have paths out to the destinations needed.

Load-balancing in real time almost never goes wrong.

This is because of the advancement of the newer routing protocols.

Nothing goes without an explanation in networking..

Actually, the packets goes more like in a stream. It does not recalculate the route for each packet, as that will require CPU and time. (which are both critical for network latency)

 

These are not 4790K replacements, and I had some doubt they'll overclock to those levels. These are more high-performance chips with enough iGPU to go toe to toe with Kaveri and Carrizo with low enough TDP to be attractive to HTPC builders and SFF makers.

Seems more like the replacement for the R-series to be honest..

[patrickjp93]

so there will still be 5770k and 5670k to come?

We don't know at this point. Part of me feels these existing SKUs are enough given Skylake is so close, and part of me would understand if enthusiasts got pissed over not getting a proper 4790K successor to play with.

[patrickjp93]

They both are slower than Haswell on the CPU side and are still weaksauce in comparison to Kaveri on the iGPU side. Broadwell was pretty much a dummy architecture for Intel to work out the kinks and bugs in their 14nm FinFET process. I doubt we will see any more than just these two skews for the desktop for that very reason. It seems like Cherry Trail is the only thing that Intel is pushing out on their 14nm node that's of any interest. Just launch the x5-Z8500 for dirt cheap already.

Pardon? Everything I'm seeing online puts HD 6000 on parity with desktop Kaveri for benchmarks and only slightly weaker in real games, and Iris 6100 closes that anyway as long as the cooling is sufficient.