LTT 3DMark Thread

[Vellinious]

2 hours ago, TheGamingBarrel said:

12K, but still got incredibly close against against 2 290X LIGHTNINGS 

Using carters stuff

Who's 290X Lightnings?  Did the drop them a few times before installing them/

[arnavvr]

I got 13,679 with one 290X.

[Jumper118]

5 minutes ago, arnavvr said:

I got 13,679 with one 290X.

and 14,001 with 2  

[TheGamingBarrel]

1 minute ago, arnavvr said:

I got 13,679 with one 290X.

22.4K With 2 LIGHTNINGS, harry was geting 31K With 2 ref cards. ( One wasn't even an X Variant )  

 

[arnavvr]

Just now, TheGamingBarrel said:

22.4K With 2 LIGHTNINGS, harry was geting 31K With 2 ref cards. ( One wasn't even an X Variant )  

 

 

You are comparing stock scores to overclocked ones why are you even doing this.

[DildorTheDecent]

3 minutes ago, TheGamingBarrel said:

 

22.4K With 2 LIGHTNINGS, harry was geting 31K With 2 ref cards. ( One wasn't even an X Variant )  

 

CPU can't keep up fam. 

[Vellinious]

= P

 

[arnavvr]

25 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

= P

 

 

Kill me.

[Outs1d3r81]

Benchmark: Fire Strike
CPU: i7 4790K 4.6Ghz
GPU: Asus Strix GTX1080 O8GB
GPU Core: 2076Mhz
GPU Memory: 1251Mhz

Score: 16648
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9442864

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike Extreme
CPU: i7 4790K 4.6Ghz
GPU: Asus Strix GTX1080 O8GB
GPU Core: 2088Mhz
GPU Memory: 1251Mhz

Score: 9544
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9442787

 

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike Ultra
CPU: i7 4790K 4.6Ghz
GPU: Asus Strix GTX1080 O8GB
GPU Core: 2076Mhz
GPU Memory: 1251Mhz

Score: 5271
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9442926

 

[DXMember]

updated spreadsheet.

 

What do you think, maybe I should be purging the results by removing duplicate hardware submissions from the same user or nah?

[done12many2]

4 minutes ago, DXMember said:

updated spreadsheet.

 

What do you think, maybe I should be purging the results by removing duplicate hardware submissions from the same user or nah?

 

I think that's a great idea.  Thanks for the update.

[DXMember]

Just now, done12many2 said:

 

I think that's a great idea.  Thanks for the update.

but that's so much work...

I don't think I'll be doing it manually, probably will update the parser and redo the whole list

[Kryptyx]

1 hour ago, DXMember said:

but that's so much work...

I don't think I'll be doing it manually, probably will update the parser and redo the whole list

I'll probably post something tomorrow. I've finally caught some much needed free time. I want to update this and have it focus on Time Spy as well.

Speaking of Time Spy, I managed to get a decent score with my rig.

 

10,096 with my 980TIs at 1541mhz and memory at 8ghz.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13502772?

[DXMember]

16 minutes ago, Kryptyx said:

I'll probably post something tomorrow. I've finally caught some much needed free time. I want to update this and have it focus on Time Spy as well

HE'S ALIVE!!!!

[Kryptyx]

Just now, DXMember said:

HE'S ALIVE!!!!

Yeah I've been really really really busy, haven't really had much free time.

[DXMember]

26 minutes ago, Kryptyx said:

Yeah I've been really really really busy, haven't really had much free time.

ha!

about that duplicate submission pruning, no worries

it has been done, turn sout was just a few click in Excel )))

now only highest result per hardware setup per user per test is on the spreadsheet

[Jumper118]

56 minutes ago, DXMember said:

ha!

about that duplicate submission pruning, no worries

it has been done, turn sout was just a few click in Excel )))

now only highest result per hardware setup per user per test is on the spreadsheet

But linus won't have as much data to sell to the new now.  Didn't you see the third pie chart on his video on where they get money from video.  There was a whole pie chart just for data hoarding and selling to nsa. 

[DXMember]

7 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

But linus won't have as much data to sell to the new now.  Didn't you see the third pie chart on his video on where they get money from video.  There was a whole pie chart just for data hoarding and selling to nsa. 

well they better have backed up it already

[MVPernula]

Got a pretty decent score on Fire Strike and Time Spy!
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9437465

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/117391

 

Top 50 with my CPU on both!

[Kryptyx]

So I'm thinking about putting emphases on the Graphics score over the combined score.

[Vellinious]

1 hour ago, Kryptyx said:

So I'm thinking about putting emphases on the Graphics score over the combined score.

That's the only thing that really matters anyway....

[done12many2]

1 hour ago, Kryptyx said:

So I'm thinking about putting emphases on the Graphics score over the combined score.

 

How would you go about this?  You could make a tab with graphic scores only for each test.

 

I personally think that overall score has value as designed by 3DMark.  Different setups will favor higher graphics score, while others with favor higher CPU scores.  As @DXMember taught me, it's about the balance with regards to combined score.

 

 

[Vellinious]

That's true, if you care about how much money someone spent on a processor....I mean, I'd leave the overall scores on the sheet, but I'd have it sorted by Graphics score.  After all, we're measuring video card performance here....the 3D Mark Physics test isn't a very good CPU benchmark.  

I think it'd level the field a bit, actually...no more top scores from guys with $1000 processors riding their killer physics scores to the top of the list, while their GPU scores are less than stellar, and usually bordering on average.

[done12many2]

38 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

That's true, if you care about how much money someone spent on a processor....I mean, I'd leave the overall scores on the sheet, but I'd have it sorted by Graphics score.  After all, we're measuring video card performance here....the 3D Mark Physics test isn't a very good CPU benchmark.  

I think it'd level the field a bit, actually...no more top scores from guys with $1000 processors riding their killer physics scores to the top of the list, while their GPU scores are less than stellar, and usually bordering on average.

 

Why am I looking over my shoulder right now?   haha

 

I personally focus on graphics scores more than physics, but I also believe that you should tweak your rig to the benchmark.  Not tweak the benchmark to your rig.  By picking one aspect of measurement, I feel we're picking the part of it that works better for us.  

 

What we currently do maintains the spirit of the test.  If we want to modify that, it should be an additional informational column and not the focus.

 

Those guys riding on those killer physics scores are exposed in other benchmarks and I think we can all see that.

[arnavvr]

That's the only reason I want a E5 1680 V2. But they are still $1000..