LTT 3DMark Thread

[Vellinious]

13 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

Am I missing something?  The only difference between the two are PCIe lane count.  Other than that they are the same when run at the same clock speed 

I'm probably wrong on that....but, have you ever seen a 5820k run a 20k graphics score?  Me either....  I've seen the 5930k pull that off though, running the same clocks I was to barely reach over 19k.  /shrug

[Mk7-Golf-R]

Benchmark: (Fire Strike
CPU: 5930k
GPU: MSI  ARMOR GTX 1080x2 in SLI
GPU Core: 2,025 MHz
GPU Memory: 1,315 MHz

Score: 25,781

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13633210?

[done12many2]

.

[Mk7-Golf-R]

Benchmark: Time Spy
CPU: 5930k
GPU: MSI  ARMOR GTX 1080x2 in SLI
GPU Core:  2,101 MHz
GPU Memory:  1,364 MHz

Score: 12,089

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13632457?

[Mk7-Golf-R]

Benchmark: firestrike Extreme
CPU: 5930k
GPU: MSI  ARMOR GTX 1080x2 in SLI
GPU Core:  2,076 MHz
GPU Memory:   1,339 MHz

Score: 17,280

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13634645?

[Mk7-Golf-R]

Benchmark: firestrike Ultra
CPU: 5930k
GPU: MSI  ARMOR GTX 1080x2 in SLI
GPU Core:  2,050 MHz
GPU Memory:   1,325 MHz

Score: 9,792

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13634398?

[bboyinsayn]

Benchmark: Firestrike

CPU: AMD FX-8350

GPU: Amd Radeon RX 480

GPU Core/Mem:  1,340 MHz/ 2,000 MHz

Score: 9425

3dmark:  http://ow.ly/sMlz302q3ao 

[valhalen]

First time post

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike
CPU: Intel Core i5-4690k
GPU: Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 EVGA
GPU Core: 1,430 MHz 

GPU Memory: 4,096 MB

Score: 11316
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8225672

[Vellinious]

New CPU came in.  Baseline run..no need to update.  CPU with just the XMP profile enabled, and clocks to 4.0....not sure what that's about.  Time to do some reading, I guess.  Anyway...too warm in here to put a hard run on the GPU, but, ran it at a nice easy 1557 / 2103.

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/161928

[DildorTheDecent]

5 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

New CPU came in.  Baseline run..no need to update.  CPU with just the XMP profile enabled, and clocks to 4.0....not sure what that's about.  Time to do some reading, I guess.  Anyway...too warm in here to put a hard run on the GPU, but, ran it at a nice easy 1557 / 2103.

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/104807

 

link says @done12many2

[Blazefire96]

Benchmark: (Fire Strike and Fire Strike Extreme)
CPU: i5 4690k 3.8GHz 
GPU: Asus Reference GTX 980 100MHz core
GPU Core: 1340MHz
GPU Memory: 1758.8MHz

Score: 11030 | Extreme 6011
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9111082 | Extreme: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9320601
PCPartPicker Link: http://ca.pcpartpicker.com/list/w7MNNN

[done12many2]

30 minutes ago, DildorTheDecent said:

 

link says @done12many2

 

Someone's been checking me out on the HOF.   

[done12many2]

36 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

New CPU came in.  Baseline run..no need to update.  CPU with just the XMP profile enabled, and clocks to 4.0....not sure what that's about.  Time to do some reading, I guess.  Anyway...too warm in here to put a hard run on the GPU, but, ran it at a nice easy 1557 / 2103.

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/104807

 

When you set XMP with the 6950x, it automatically clocks to 4 GHz.  Exact same thing happened with the one that I had.

[Vellinious]

43 minutes ago, DildorTheDecent said:

 

link says @done12many2

What the....that's not my link.  lol

Fixed.  = P

[Vellinious]

12 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

When you set XMP with the 6950x, it automatically clocks to 4 GHz.  Exact same thing happened with the one that I had.

I need to see if I can get the voltage lowered a bit.  It's defaulting to 1.277v.  I ran OCCT for a couple hours on it, and it peaked at 76c.  A bit warm for my liking...it is rather warm in this room today, though.  26c....  

[arnavvr]

Just now, Vellinious said:

I need to see if I can get the voltage lowered a bit.  It's defaulting to 1.277v.  I ran OCCT for a couple hours on it, and it peaked at 76c.  A bit warm for my liking...it is rather warm in this room today, though.  26c....  

 

You finally got it  I need to get some X5680s and really push my rig.

[done12many2]

5 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

What the....that's not my link.  lol

Fixed.  = P

Glad to hear that you got that beast up and running.  Looking forward to seeing some results.

 

This was one of my runs with the 6950x that I had at 4.5 in FireStrike 1.1

 

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8694456

 

[arnavvr]

1 minute ago, done12many2 said:

Glad to hear that you got that beast up and running.  Looking forward to seeing some results.

 

This was one of my runs with the 6950x that I had at 4.5 in FireStrike 1.1

 

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8694456

 

 

Why did you get rid of the 6950X?

[done12many2]

3 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

I need to see if I can get the voltage lowered a bit.  It's defaulting to 1.277v.  I ran OCCT for a couple hours on it, and it peaked at 76c.  A bit warm for my liking...it is rather warm in this room today, though.  26c....  

 

Oh yeah bud.  Be ready for some heat!!!!!  You're going to need water cooling to cool your water cooling.  

 

Here are the temps I was getting during a 1.5 hour OCCT:Linpack with  AVX enabled.  Grant it, I was at 4.5 GHz and 1.4v+ volts, but that sucker was HOT!

 

 

[Vellinious]

1 minute ago, done12many2 said:

 

Oh yeah bud.  Be ready for some heat!!!!!  You're going to need water cooling to cool your water cooling.  

 

Here are the temps I was getting during a 1.5 hour OCCT:Linpack with  AVX enabled.  Grant it, I was at 4.5 GHz and 1.4v+ volts, but that sucker was HOT!

 

 

I've been looking to see if there's a cure time for Kryonaut, but I can't find anything.  The temps I'm getting seem a tad high for the clocks / volts.

[done12many2]

1 minute ago, arnavvr said:

Why did you get rid of the 6950X?

 

Core for core at MAX overclock, my 5960x was faster.  Don't get me wrong, Broadwell-E is much better clock for clock, but when I pushed both to max overclock, the single core and multi core performance of my 5960x was better when comparing the same amount of cores.  I hope that makes sense?  Keep in mind that my 5960x is above average, but in order for me to justify keeping my 6950x, I needed more.

 

I tried the same direct experimenting with a 6800k with the same results.

 

With all cores firing though, there is no disputing that the 6950x is an absolute BEAST.

[done12many2]

2 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

I've been looking to see if there's a cure time for Kryonaut, but I can't find anything.  The temps I'm getting seem a tad high for the clocks / volts.

 

How much surface area are you working with in your loop?

[arnavvr]

Just now, done12many2 said:

 

Core for core at MAX overclock, my 5960x was faster.  Don't get me wrong, Broadwell-E is much better clock for clock, but when I pushed both to max overclock, the single core and multi core performance of my 5960x was better when comparing the same amount of cores.  I hope that makes sense?  Keep in mind that my 5960x is above average, but in order for me to justify keeping my 6950x, I needed more.

 

I tried the same direct experimenting with a 6800k with the same results.

 

With all cores firing though, there is no disputing that the 6950x is an absolute BEAST.

 

Get a binned one from siliconlottery.com If you can pony up the cash.

[done12many2]

4 minutes ago, arnavvr said:

Get a binned one from siliconlottery.com If you can pony up the cash.

 

Asus tested hundreds of Broadwell-E chips in their board prep for Broadwell-E.  This was their breakdown.  

 

The 6950x I had would do 4.5 @ 1.45v stable all day long without issue.  SL was selling chips guaranteed to 4.4 @ 1.344v for $1900, which is the same voltage of the 6950x I had at 4.4.  I bought mine at Micro Center for $1599.00  

[arnavvr]

1 minute ago, done12many2 said:

 

The 6950x I had was already a bit of a freak.   None of the SL chips were any better and cost more.

 

What kind of workload are you doing?