Jump to content

Hi guys!

 

Here are my specs

 

Core i5 2500k @4.3 Ghz

Saphire Tri x r9 290

120 GB SSD

12 GB RAM

Cooler Master Silent Pro 700w PSU

 

Thing is I play mostly Battlefield 4, Multiplayer and with my cpu I am getting a 90-100% usage while gaming on large maps with 64 players. Does this mean that my CPU could be bottlenecking my GPU? And if so, would you recommend a CPU upgrade to i7 or is it poitnless?

 

I get good frames with Mantle enabled, but with DirectX I get somewhere between 50-80 FPS...

 

Thx!!!

 

EDIT: AsRock Extreme 4 Socket 1155 Mobo

Knowledge don't take space. Don't know something? Just ask nicely!

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

not at all.

Motherboard - Gigabyte P67A-UD5 Processor - Intel Core i7-2600K RAM - G.Skill Ripjaws @1600 8GB Graphics Cards  - MSI and EVGA GeForce GTX 580 SLI PSU - Cooler Master Silent Pro 1,000w SSD - OCZ Vertex 3 120GB x2 HDD - WD Caviar Black 1TB Case - Corsair Obsidian 600D Audio - Asus Xonar DG


   Hail Sithis!

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2597967
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can easily tell. Monitor GPU load with MSi afterburner. If the GPU load isn't 100% you got yourself a bottleneck.

RIG: I7-4790k @ 4.5GHz | MSI Z97S SLI Plus | 12GB Geil Dragon RAM 1333MHz | Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX 970 (1550MHz core/7800MHz memory) @ +18mV(Maxed out at 1650/7800 so far) | Corsair RM750 | Samsung 840 EVO 120GB, 1TB Seagate Barracuda | Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 (Closed) | Sound Blaster Z                                                                                                                        Getting: Noctua NH-D15 | Possible 250GB Samsung 850 Evo                                                                                        Need a console killer that actually shits on every console? Here you go (No MIR/Promo)

This is why you should not get an FX CPU for ANY scenario other than rendering on a budget http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/286142-fx-8350-r9-290-psu-requirements/?p=3892901 http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/266481-an-issue-with-people-bashing-the-fx-cpus/?p=3620861

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2597970
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure its because battlefield 4 can use up to 8 threads. So in this game it is a bottleneck. But currently this is the only game that your CPU is bottlenecking, so is it really worth spending $500 for a CPU upgrade just to play this one game at a couple more fps?

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2597986
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure its because battlefield 4 can use up to 8 threads. So in this game it is a bottleneck. But currently this is the only game that your CPU is bottlenecking, so is it really worth spending $500 for a CPU upgrade just to play this one game at a couple more fps?

What he said. If the game is very CPU intensive it will appear as a bottleneck but only in games that are CPU intensive. Normally your 2500k will be more than powerful enough. Just enable Mantle and you are good to go.

RIG: I7-4790k @ 4.5GHz | MSI Z97S SLI Plus | 12GB Geil Dragon RAM 1333MHz | Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX 970 (1550MHz core/7800MHz memory) @ +18mV(Maxed out at 1650/7800 so far) | Corsair RM750 | Samsung 840 EVO 120GB, 1TB Seagate Barracuda | Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 (Closed) | Sound Blaster Z                                                                                                                        Getting: Noctua NH-D15 | Possible 250GB Samsung 850 Evo                                                                                        Need a console killer that actually shits on every console? Here you go (No MIR/Promo)

This is why you should not get an FX CPU for ANY scenario other than rendering on a budget http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/286142-fx-8350-r9-290-psu-requirements/?p=3892901 http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/266481-an-issue-with-people-bashing-the-fx-cpus/?p=3620861

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2598009
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its more an issue with dx 11's inefficient use of the cpu than anything else.

I see the same here in bf4 with my i5-2500. Fps drops accompanied by gpu usage drops in dx11 and consistent high fps and gpu usage with mantle.

Hopefully dx12 helps with this as well in future games

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2611899
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, with directx I get round 60/70% GPU usage, while on Mantle I get 100% usage most of the time.

Raise the cpu clock up or use Mantle.

 

 

Its more an issue with dx 11's inefficient use of the cpu than anything else.

I see the same here in bf4 with my i5-2500. Fps drops accompanied by gpu usage drops in dx11 and consistent high fps and gpu usage with mantle.

Hopefully dx12 helps with this as well in future games

Not only that, the driver overhead on AMD's side seems to be bigger than on nvidia - both dx mode. As you notice the big gap between the APU/780ti and the 4770K/780ti the APU is bottlenecking badly, same thing with the 290x in dx mode. So focus on the APU for now, the difference between the 780ti/apu and 290x/apu is quite large thats mainly because nvidia drivers suffer from less overhead which overall reduces some cpu bottlenecking, hence why they gave their 337.50 the name "wonder driver cpu bottlenecking". Ofc when you're feeding the 780ti or 290x to 99% the difference is like it should be 5-10%.

battlefield-4-mantle-benchmarks.gif

bf4_cpu_gpue7qax7sf86.png

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2613011
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus BF4 isn't the best engine as it can create its own bottlenecks to a degree, compared to almost any other game you throw on your i5/290 BF4 will be the worst culprit of looking like there's a bottleneck.

If every other game is fine GPU usage 98-100% & BF4 is dipping GPU usage down It can be the engine at fault.

My i7 2600k @ 4.8Ghz still sees my 290 having 85-100% usage on certain situations on certain maps (Shanghai being pretty bad/worst)

Yet every other game works flawlessly, temps are awesome. Just BF4 being BF4.

Overclocking will bring your performance up a good amount in regards to MIN/MAX Fps, and Average will gain/stabilize a bit better overall., so doing that is a nice bonus.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2613521
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2500k is still fine. Oh and OC that baby to 4.8 Ghz. It should be capable with the Extreme4 if you do it right.

Got it to 4.3 Ghz up to know. I am a bit of a noob when it comes to OC. I have a Hyper 212 Cooler, and @ 4.3 Ghz temperatures are in the mid 70 when gaming for a couple of hours, don't know if I have room for more OCing  :mellow:

Knowledge don't take space. Don't know something? Just ask nicely!

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2615831
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it to 4.3 Ghz up to know. I am a bit of a noob when it comes to OC. I have a Hyper 212 Cooler, and @ 4.3 Ghz temperatures are in the mid 70 when gaming for a couple of hours, don't know if I have room for more OCing  :mellow:

 

Oh. Yeah, I could only get mine up to 4.4 with the 212 before the temps got too high

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2615911
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it to 4.3 Ghz up to know. I am a bit of a noob when it comes to OC. I have a Hyper 212 Cooler, and @ 4.3 Ghz temperatures are in the mid 70 when gaming for a couple of hours, don't know if I have room for more OCing  :mellow:

that seem pretty hot. what voltage is that at. i'm getting mid 70's at 5ghz under a better cooler, but im running 1.4v as well

Rig Specs:

AMD Threadripper 5990WX@4.8Ghz

Asus Zenith III Extreme

Asrock OC Formula 7970XTX Quadfire

G.Skill Ripheartout X OC 7000Mhz C28 DDR5 4X16GB  

Super Flower Power Leadex 2000W Psu's X2

Harrynowl's 775/771 OC and mod guide: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/232325-lga775-core2duo-core2quad-overclocking-guide/ http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/365998-mod-lga771-to-lga775-cpu-modification-tutorial/

ProKoN haswell/DC OC guide: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/41234-intel-haswell-4670k-4770k-overclocking-guide/

 

"desperate for just a bit more money to watercool, the titan x would be thankful" Carter -2016

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2616668
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same CPU and I was wondering if getting another 290x would bottle neck it? (2 x 290x crossfire) If so maybe I will finally get to overclock it but i don't know if people who overclock only do it for the numbers or actually leave it running overclocked

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2617189
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

that seem pretty hot. what voltage is that at. i'm getting mid 70's at 5ghz under a better cooler, but im running 1.4v as well

I have it on Offset mode on the bios, and its around 1.3 / 1.35. It get to 70/75 but after a long session of gaming.

Knowledge don't take space. Don't know something? Just ask nicely!

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2617422
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have it on Offset mode on the bios, and its around 1.3 / 1.35. It get to 70/75 but after a long session of gaming.

is 4.3ghz the highest you can get at that voltage? most should do 4.6ghz under 1.4v easy. 

Rig Specs:

AMD Threadripper 5990WX@4.8Ghz

Asus Zenith III Extreme

Asrock OC Formula 7970XTX Quadfire

G.Skill Ripheartout X OC 7000Mhz C28 DDR5 4X16GB  

Super Flower Power Leadex 2000W Psu's X2

Harrynowl's 775/771 OC and mod guide: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/232325-lga775-core2duo-core2quad-overclocking-guide/ http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/365998-mod-lga771-to-lga775-cpu-modification-tutorial/

ProKoN haswell/DC OC guide: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/41234-intel-haswell-4670k-4770k-overclocking-guide/

 

"desperate for just a bit more money to watercool, the titan x would be thankful" Carter -2016

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2617491
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Raise the cpu clock up or use Mantle.

 

 

Not only that, the driver overhead on AMD's side seems to be bigger than on nvidia - both dx mode. As you notice the big gap between the APU/780ti and the 4770K/780ti the APU is bottlenecking badly, same thing with the 290x in dx mode. So focus on the APU for now, the difference between the 780ti/apu and 290x/apu is quite large thats mainly because nvidia drivers suffer from less overhead which overall reduces some cpu bottlenecking, hence why they gave their 337.50 the name "wonder driver cpu bottlenecking". Ofc when you're feeding the 780ti or 290x to 99% the difference is like it should be 5-10%.

battlefield-4-mantle-benchmarks.gif

bf4_cpu_gpue7qax7sf86.png

 

Yeah, I have heard that nvidia's DX11 driver has better multithreading to a degree, because AMD drivers don't support directx 11 buffered commandlists (afaik it was a conscious decision not to support this feature from AMD, because they weren't happy with its implementation in DX11 and weren't able to get satisfactory performance results on their architecture with it, in some cases it actually performed worse).

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2618900
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I have heard that nvidia's DX11 driver has better multithreading to a degree, because AMD drivers don't support directx 11 buffered commandlists (afaik it was a conscious decision not to support this feature from AMD, because they weren't happy with its implementation in DX11 and weren't able to get satisfactory performance results on their architecture with it, in some cases it actually performed worse).

Just multithr optimizations which doesnt do much if the game itself isn't properly threaded. The game itself has to be better threaded, it basically does nothing to a game like WoW which only has 2 main threads.

The reason why nvidia did better is because their drivers suffer from less overhead. A driver always has some overhead that obviously effects the cpu performance which could lead into a having a cpu bottleneck or make the cpu bottleneck bigger. Nvidia can only reduce the driver overhead, they can't do anything if the game itself is extremely cpu bound such as wow where as an new API can do much more.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/191898-i5-2500k-bottleneck/#findComment-2619032
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×