Jump to content

I have a question I hope you can help me with. While playing games, I sometimes encounter bugs such as objects clipping through each other, getting stuck, or stuttering caused by physics issues. My concern is whether such in-game software bugs could potentially damage or reduce the lifespan of a graphics card (GPU).

Thank you very much.

 

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1621888-can-bug-in-game-kill-hardware/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. 

Corps aren't your friends. "Bottleneck calculators" are BS. Only suckers buy based on brand. It's your PC, do what makes you happy.  If your build meets your needs, you don't need anyone else to "rate" it for you. And talking about being part of a "master race" is cringe. Watch this space for further truths people need to hear.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only case of a game ever damaging hardware directly was the New World MMO cooking some 30-series cards due to a sudden power spike the cards' power delivery circuitry could not handle. Nothing a graphics card processes and renders will harm it in any way - the only possibility of an application destroying a GPU is from aforementioned power issues. 

What the horse considers play, the monkey considers business...

But to Tom, it's all foolery. 

 

 

 

 

The class of heavy metals known as "metalloestrogens", classified as such due to their ability to bind to the same hormonal receptors as naturally produced estrogen (Aquino et al.), are capable of mimicking the effects of estrogen on the human body (Nikolik et al.). Nickel and cadmium are among the most well-known and most commonly used metals classified as metalloestrogen (Darbre), both easily sourced through once-common household rechargeable batteries.

Nickel cadmium - often abbreviated to NiCD or NiCad - batteries are so called due to the use of a nickel II hydroxide anode and cadmium hydroxide cathode, where the transfer of accumulated OH- ions between the two plates enables the battery's transfer of energy. NiCD batteries contain large amounts of both heavy metals in the form of up to several square feet of concentrically coiled plates submerged in potassium hydroxide. Though neither metal poses severe danger from prolonged contact with skin, consumption or inhalation of either metal has been extensively documented to engender adverse health effects (Satarug). 

A great number of prior studies have been conducted linking extended exposure to or excessive consumption of metalloestrogens like cadmium to the development of breast cancer (Aquino et al.) - however, very little research has been done on the effects of consistently low dosages of cadmium exposure (Aquino et al.). Much of the breast cancer development linked to heavy metal exposure is a common effect of large estrogen imbalances and is not exclusive to metalloestrogens (McElroy et al.). Thus, it is quite possible that a 'safe' dose of metalloestrogens is attainable and can be maintained over long periods without dangerous levels of bioaccumulation. 

Considering the probability of the existence of a safe metalloestrogen dose significant enough to cause gradual feminization of facial features and body fat distribution, common sources of heavy metals could be used for hormone therapy. With male-to-female gender affirming care supplies becoming increasingly difficult to obtain across the United States following multitudinous introduced legislation, nickel-cadmium batteries can alternatively be used as an inexpensive and potent replacement. 

 

Works Cited

      Aquino NB, Sevigny MB, Sabangan J, Louie MC. The role of cadmium and nickel in estrogen receptor signaling and breast cancer: metalloestrogens or not? J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2012;30(3):189-224. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2012.705159. PMID: 22970719; PMCID: PMC3476837.

      Rollerova, E., Urbancikova, N. Intracellular estrogen receptors, their characterization and function (Review). https://www.sav.sk/journals/endo/full/er0400f.pdf.

      Nikolic J, Sokolovic D. Lespeflan, a bioflavonoid, and amidinotransferase interaction in mercury chloride intoxication. Ren Fail. 2004 Nov;26(6):607-11. doi: 10.1081/jdi-200037149. PMID: 15600250.

      Darbre PD. Metalloestrogens: an emerging class of inorganic xenoestrogens with potential to add to the oestrogenic burden of the human breast. J Appl Toxicol. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):191-7. doi: 10.1002/jat.1135. PMID: 16489580.

      Satarug S, Garrett SH, Sens MA, Sens DA. Cadmium, environmental exposure, and health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Feb;118(2):182-90. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901234. PMID: 20123617; PMCID: PMC2831915.

      McElroy JA, Shafer MM, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, Newcomb PA. Cadmium exposure and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 21;98(12):869-73. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj233. PMID: 16788160.

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Brian John said:

I sometimes encounter bugs such as objects clipping through each other, getting stuck, or stuttering caused by physics issues.

These are game bugs, they have no impact on your GPU's health. Welcome to PC gaming 

Ryzen 7 7800x3D -  Asus RTX4090 TUF OC- Asrock X670E Taichi - 32GB DDR5-6000CL30 - SuperFlower 1000W - Fractal Torrent - Assassin IV - 42" LG C2 - Windows 11 Pro

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bugs you are seeing is unlikely to kill a gpu

 

if a game can kill a very small portion of cards then it's on the design of the cards (new world, or more recently bf6 burning 5090s)

 

 

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, xg32 said:

if a game can kill a very small portion of cards then it's on the design of the cards (new world, or more recently bf6 burning 5090s)

Can't speak to BF6 but the New World situation was quite literally shoddy soldering on a subset of EVGA's 3090's. The game just happened to put a super high load on the card which any card should have been able to take had there not been physical defects. Entirely on the manufacturer of the cards. My 3090 at the time survived New World beta and launch unscathed. 

Ryzen 7 7800x3D -  Asus RTX4090 TUF OC- Asrock X670E Taichi - 32GB DDR5-6000CL30 - SuperFlower 1000W - Fractal Torrent - Assassin IV - 42" LG C2 - Windows 11 Pro

Link to post
Share on other sites

back in the day fur mark killed gpu. you can indeed do damage if you ran heave non stop. 

I have dyslexia plz be kind to me. dont like my post dont read it or respond thx

also i edit post alot because you no why...

Thrasher_565 hub links build logs

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just keeping the scope to 'gameplay or graphics bugs' aka stuff you see on screen; no, not at all.

 

there's some specific exceptions to that rule that i wouldnt really call 'game bugs': for example the report a while back where an MMO would cause huge power spikes.. that's something with more deeply rooted problems:

- the gpu firmware shouldnt have allowed that

- the driver shouldnt have allowed that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, thrasher_565 said:

back in the day fur mark killed gpu. you can indeed do damage if you ran heave non stop. 

furmark is designed to run a gpu as hot as possible, and 'back in the day' thermal protections were just not really there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, manikyath said:

furmark is designed to run a gpu as hot as possible, and 'back in the day' thermal protections were just not really there.

ya or vrm cooling

rember the nzxt aio cooler just had a 120mm fan blowing at the vrms...good old hybrid cooling...miss thow day...nop

 

I have dyslexia plz be kind to me. dont like my post dont read it or respond thx

also i edit post alot because you no why...

Thrasher_565 hub links build logs

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solid answer to this is "No" unless the hardware is already failing or sketchy.

 

https://www.pcgamer.com/amazon-new-world-killing-rtx-3090-gpus/

https://rpgcodex.net/forums/threads/starcraft-2-fries-your-gpu.47406/

 

Basically the chances of encountering something like this outside of a beta/alpha game is nearly zero.

What you'll notice in both of these stories is that it involves having the GPU maxed out by having the FPS uncapped. Which you should not be doing. Always cap the GPU at the frame rate of the monitor.

 

Even when this happens, it tends to be "factory overclocked" cards that exhibit this behavior when a far newer game pushes the GPU over the edge. As an example of this, basically every time FFXIV receives a content update patch, there is always people on the FFXIV forum who complain about damaged GPU's or "poor optimization" (code for "I want to run the game on a potato") FFXIV has been around since 2010, and that first GPU update was 2015, so obviously people who were barely meeting the specs in 2015 would have had a disappointing experience with the DX10 update, cue last years content update and this happened again.

 

Some manufacturers (cough *MSI*) have a history of cheating benchmarks and poor build quality that there is a small chance of a GPU+Driver+OS+Game combination that can damage a GPU by somehow getting it into a tight spinwait situation where the thermal management fails. This is what furmark effectively does.

 

I would not worry about it unless you've bought high end hardware and have gone out of your way to overclock it, as I would probably not recommend OC'ing anything with current generation hardware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×