Jump to content

Which CPU/APU will peform better at Windows 10?

The i3-4370, i5-3330 or A10-7800B? I'll be mainly using it for light office work, browsing, and possibly programming. I won't add a GPU, but can they handle 1440P?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

First 2 are just borderline nowadays. AMD CPU on the other hand was destined for landfil the moment they released it. Are these your only options? Out of those i5 is the the one with most cores.

mY sYsTeM iS Not pErfoRmInG aS gOOd As I sAW oN yOuTuBe. WhA t IS a GoOd FaN CuRVe??!!? wHat aRe tEh GoOd OvERclok SeTTinGS FoR My CaRd??  HoW CaN I foRcE my GpU to uSe 1o0%? BuT WiLL i HaVE Bo0tllEnEcKs? RyZEN dOeS NoT peRfORm BetTer wItH HiGhER sPEED RaM!!dId i WiN teH SiLiCON LotTerrYyOu ShoUlD dEsHrOuD uR GPUmy SYstEm iS UNDerPerforMiNg iN WarzONEcan mY Pc Run WiNdOwS 11 ?woUld BaKInG MY GRaPHics card fIX it? MultimETeR TeSTiNG!! aMd'S GpU DrIvErS aRe as goOD aS NviDia's YOU SHoUlD oVERCloCk yOUR ramS To 5000C18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Levent said:

First 2 are just borderline nowadays. AMD CPU on the other hand was destined for landfil the moment they released it. Are these your only options? Out of those i5 is the the one with most cores.

I'll give some context, so basically I have everthing expect a MOBO and CPU. I'm keeping my budget under $30 (excluding what I already have) and so far the MOBO costs $13 and the i5-3330 is $11. The next CPU on the ladder is the i5-3570k for $16, the other CPUs (like i7) are atleast $20. I already have another PC, but this is more of a project and try the 2nd hand (Chinese) market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to have an i5-3570K. While it should technically be able to do 2560x1600, mine was limited to 1080p. Likely a combination of board + connector type that was used.

Remember to either quote or @mention others, so they are notified of your reply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Eigenvektor said:

I used to have an i5-3570K. While it should technically be able to do 2560x1600, mine was limited to 1080p. Likely a combination of board + connector type that was used.

I do have a VGA to HDMI adapter. It was able to push A4-3300 to 1440p, but not without developing artifacts due to it's iGPU's limitations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

i5-3330 would probably give the least worst experience of the lot. The only caution I'd have is it only has older AVX instructions, not AVX2 introduced with 4th gen.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You want to avoid the A10. The GPU is decent but the Steamroller CPU is absolute garbage. I've had the A10 7800 and the x4 860K and both struggled with basic tasks in Win10.

Asus ROG G531GT : i7-9750H - GTX 1650M +700mem - MSI RX6600 Armor 8G M.2 eGPU - Samsung 16+8GB PC4-2666 - Samsung 860 EVO 500G 2.5" - 1920x1080@145Hz (172Hz) IPS panel

Family PC : i5-4570 (-125mV) - cheap dual-pipe cooler - Gigabyte Z87M-HD3 Rev1.1 - Kingston HyperX Fury 4x4GB PC3-1600 - Corsair VX450W - an old Thermaltake ATX case

Test bench 1 G3260 - i5-4690K - 6-pipe cooler - Asus Z97-AR - Panram Blue Lightsaber 2x4GB PC3-2800 - Micron CT500P1SSD8 NVMe - Intel SSD320 40G SSD

iMac 21.5" (late 2011) : i5-2400S, HD 6750M 512MB - Samsung 4x4GB PC3-1333 - WT200 512G SSD (High Sierra) - 1920x1080@60 LCD

 

Test bench 2: G3260 - H81M-C - Kingston 2x4GB PC3-1600 - Winten WT200 512G

Acer Z5610 "Theatre" C2 Quad Q9550 - G45 Express - 2x2GB PC3-1333 (Samsung) - 1920x1080@60Hz Touch LCD - great internal speakers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, porina said:

i5-3330 would probably give the least worst experience of the lot. The only caution I'd have is it only has older AVX instructions, not AVX2 introduced with 4th gen.

Even against the i5-3750k?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AccDossNumber15 said:

Even against the i5-3750k?

I missed that later down. It would be a small upgrade on the 3330 with slightly higher clocks. If that is worth it is up to you.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, porina said:

I missed that later down. It would be a small upgrade on the 3330 with slightly higher clocks. If that is worth it is up to you.

If UserBenchMark is reliable since it's Intel vs Intel there's 10% increase in pref, but not really worth it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AccDossNumber15 said:

If UserBenchMark is reliable since it's Intel vs Intel there's 10% increase in pref, but not really worth it. 

no please GOD NO, it's the first option when you look things up, but its not reliable, look for REAL benchmarks, from somewhere like tom's hardware or similar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×