Jump to content

win-rar.com vs rarlab?

Melodist

I downloaded and purchased the newest version of winrar through win-rar.com instead of rarlab, was that good?

 

In hindsight, I checked the installer of win-rar.com and it is a few kilobytes smaller than the one from rarlab?

 

Left is from win-rar.com and right from rarlab?

 

20230824_005609.thumb.jpg.c1f1e260abb4cec011b1b6773a6a6271.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OhioYJ said:

I have to ask what do you need winrar for?

For unpacking files? Has been the most reliable for me. Such as installers from Avid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dilpickle said:

Both websites are the same company. Its fine.

Just weird that the executable has different sizes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Melodist said:

Just weird that the executable has different sizes.

RARLab is the company that makes WinRAR. If you're at all concerned, check the digital signature of the exe.

ask me about my homelab

on a personal quest convincing the general public to return to the glory that is 12" laptops.

cheap and easy cable management is my fetish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with @OhioYJ, 7zip is much better.

 

But if you do want to use WinRAR, I usually got it from RARLab's website.

Currently working towards fully restoring my ThinkPad T510

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 -- ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6650 XT OC Edition 8GB -- Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 32GB 3200MHz DDR4 (4x8GB) -- ASRock B450M Steel Legend -- Corsair CX650M -- SAMA IM01 -- Crucial P2 500GB NVMe, 2x Crucial BX500 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Melodist said:

For unpacking files? Has been the most reliable for me. Such as installers from Avid.

You only need a license to compress files with WinRAR. There are free alternatives if you just want to decompress them, such as 7zip. These days I don't really see an advantage compressing to .rar instead of .7z

Remember to either quote or @mention others, so they are notified of your reply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 8/24/2023 at 12:33 PM, AbsoluteWoo said:

I can't believe you've paid for WinRAR. 🤣

Are you the type who likes their stuff for free? Do you also work for free, for fun and pay your hardware-purchases with your body?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd never pay for WinRAR. In fact, anytime I find the trial version, I install 7zip.

 

WinRAR is faster, but most of the times, 7zip is just fine.

Not English-speaking person, sorry, I'll make mistakes. If you're kind, maybe you'll be able to understand.

If you're really kind, you'll nicely point that out so I will learn more about write in good English.  🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2023 at 3:12 PM, Melodist said:

Are you the type who likes their stuff for free? Do you also work for free, for fun and pay your hardware-purchases with your body?

No, I am someone who doesn't pay for niche software when 1) there are free versions available, and 2) I don't need the niche features.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×