Jump to content

BOINC CPU credits

Hello there,

so I don't really understand how BOINC stats work, so I think that faster and more cores = more credits? I just assume credits = amount of tasks per day = more better.

Now I have a AMD 7900X locked to 95W and I get this amount of credits 14,398.26, I'm also the only one using a AMD 7900X hehe.

I'm looking at this chart here: https://www.boincstats.com/stats/3/host/breakdown/cpu/0/6/0

 

Now I don't know if this is the total amount of credits from everyone using the CPU.
So my AMD 7900X does 14,398.26credits on avg.
Now there are also 21x i7 2600 CPUs that do 16,506.30credits per day. So it must be the total amount of all the i7 2600 CPUs credits? So 16,506.30 / 21 = 786credits per i7 2600?

 

I'm trying to figure it out if I should get a 7950X

Intel NUC 13 | i3 1315U2x 8GB 3600/CL16

 

 

AMD 7950x3d | Sapphire 7800XT Nitro | 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance 5600Mhz CL36 1R | MSI B650-P Pro Wifi | Custom Loop


AUNE X8 Magic DAC + SS3602

AUNE X7s PRO Class-A | Sennheiser HD58X

Schiit Rekkr ELAC BS243.3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been awhile since I've heard anyone talk about using BOINC, have they changed something? Last I remember BOINC credits weren't worth jack unless you yourself are hosting projects. Is that still the case?

Main Desktop: CPU - i9-14900k | Mobo - Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Elite AX DDR4 | GPU - ASUS TUF Gaming OC RTX 4090 RAM - Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB 64GB 3600mhz | AIO - H150i Pro XT | PSU - Corsair RM1000X | Case - Phanteks P500A Digital - White | Storage - Samsung 970 Pro M.2 NVME SSD 512GB / Sabrent Rocket 1TB Nvme / Samsung 860 Evo Pro 500GB / Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2tb Nvme / Samsung 870 QVO 4TB  |

 

TV Streaming PC: Intel Nuc CPU - i7 8th Gen | RAM - 16GB DDR4 2666mhz | Storage - 256GB WD Black M.2 NVME SSD |

 

Phone: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 - Phantom Black 512GB |

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BotDamian said:

So 16,506.30 / 21 = 786credits per i7 2600?

Correct

 

27 minutes ago, BotDamian said:

AMD 7900X does 14,398.26credits on avg

Incorrect, it does 7199 per R9.

 

27 minutes ago, BotDamian said:

I'm trying to figure it out if I should get a 7950X

Just for BOINC? Probably not. Is there other work you do with this CPU?

5950X/3080Ti primary rig  |  1920X/1070Ti Unraid for dockers  |  200TB TrueNAS w/ 1:1 backup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BotDamian said:

Hello there,

so I don't really understand how BOINC stats work, so I think that faster and more cores = more credits? I just assume credits = amount of tasks per day = more better.

Now I have a AMD 7900X locked to 95W and I get this amount of credits 14,398.26, I'm also the only one using a AMD 7900X hehe.

I'm looking at this chart here: https://www.boincstats.com/stats/3/host/breakdown/cpu/0/6/0

 

Now I don't know if this is the total amount of credits from everyone using the CPU.
So my AMD 7900X does 14,398.26credits on avg.
Now there are also 21x i7 2600 CPUs that do 16,506.30credits per day. So it must be the total amount of all the i7 2600 CPUs credits? So 16,506.30 / 21 = 786credits per i7 2600?

 

I'm trying to figure it out if I should get a 7950X

Short answer - It's complicated. Yes, a 7950x would increase your yield. In general, as your the first brave soul running Zen 4 on LHC you will have to monitor your yield as you make changes to find the optimal settings.

 

From that chart you linked it shows a R9 7900x with 2 CPUs (cores) yielding 13,981.83 total average credit and 6,990.92 average credit per CPU (core). This is in-line with what I see as the typical yield for a single core of an R9 5900x and 3900x on WCG.

 

In general, yes, as you add more cores the total average credit will scale linearly.

 

Likewise, running a core at a higher frequency will yield more points in a given period.

 

But Hyperthreading (i.e. running a task on each thread of a CPU's core) will not magically double your average yield but will likely result in a 20% or so increase in the overall per-core yield.

 

To test this you'd have to disable hyper-threading and run a single core for a few days on the same workload at a fixed clock-speed and record the results, then run 2 cores on the same workload and clock-speed and observe the results. Stepping through increasing the cores you will likely discover 2 things:

1. Your CPU will not be able to boost as high as you increase the cores used. This is normal and is part of the Boost Algorithm used. You are running at a 95W Limit and as you approach that limit the CPU will, of necessity, have to clock down to meet it resulting in lower average clocks per core.

 

2. As you approach 12 cores used you will see diminishing returns as your BOINC tasks will be competing for CPU time with the OS overhead. Linux typically has a better scheduler for BOINC and lower system overhead compared to Windows. On my (headless) Linux systems I can usually get away with leaving just a single thread available for OS overhead with only a slight impact on yield per thread. On Windows you will typically want to leave at least 2 threads available for the OS on a system that is dedicated to BOINC, on your daily driver I'd suggest leaving 6-8 threads free depending on how demanding the work you normally do on the system is.

 

On my sole Windows system which is my daily driver, for example, I run 18 threads using 16 for World Community Grid CPU tasks and 2 to feed an Nvidia GPU that does WCG OpenPandemics GPU tasks when they are available and Einstein@Home when there is no WCG Open Pandemic Tasks available. Thus leaving me with 6 threads for my day-to-day tasks (I have a separate GPU for display out).

FaH BOINC HfM

Bifrost - 6 GPU Folding Rig  Linux Folding HOWTO Folding Remote Access Folding GPU Profiling ToU Scheduling UPS

Systems:

desktop: Lian-Li O11 Air Mini; Asus ProArt x670 WiFi; Ryzen 9 7950x; EVGA 240 CLC; 4 x 32GB DDR5-5600; 2 x Samsung 980 Pro 500GB PCIe3 NVMe; 2 x 8TB NAS; AMD FirePro W4100; MSI 4070 Ti Super Ventus 2; Corsair SF750

nas1: Fractal Node 804; SuperMicro X10sl7-f; Xeon e3-1231v3; 4 x 8GB DDR3-1666 ECC; 2 x 250GB Samsung EVO Pro SSD; 7 x 4TB Seagate NAS; Corsair HX650i

nas2: Synology DS-123j; 2 x 6TB WD Red Plus NAS

nas3: Synology DS-224+; 2 x 12TB Seagate NAS

dcn01: Fractal Meshify S2; Gigabyte Aorus ax570 Master; Ryzen 9 5900x; Noctua NH-D15; 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200; 512GB NVMe; 2 x Zotac AMP 4070ti; Corsair RM750Mx

dcn02: Fractal Meshify S2; Gigabyte ax570 Pro WiFi; Ryzen 9 3950x; Noctua NH-D15; 2 x 16GB DDR4-3200; 128GB NVMe; 2 x Zotac AMP 4070ti; Corsair RM750x

dcn03: Fractal Meshify C; Gigabyte Aorus z370 Gaming 5; i9-9900k; BeQuiet! PureRock 2 Black; 2 x 8GB DDR4-2400; 128GB SATA m.2; MSI 4070 Ti Super Gaming X; MSI 4070 Ti Super Ventus 2; Corsair TX650m

dcn05: Fractal Define S; Gigabyte Aorus b450m; Ryzen 7 2700; AMD Wraith; 2 x 8GB DDR 4-3200; 128GB SATA NVMe; Gigabyte Gaming RTX 4080 Super; Corsair TX750m

dcn06: Fractal Focus G Mini; Gigabyte Aorus b450m; Ryzen 7 2700; AMD Wraith; 2 x 8GB DDR 4-3200; 128GB SSD; Gigabyte Gaming RTX 4080 Super; Corsair CX650m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So me having 14k credits is 2 cores running while the CPU shows that it runs on all cores? I'm confused.

Intel NUC 13 | i3 1315U2x 8GB 3600/CL16

 

 

AMD 7950x3d | Sapphire 7800XT Nitro | 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance 5600Mhz CL36 1R | MSI B650-P Pro Wifi | Custom Loop


AUNE X8 Magic DAC + SS3602

AUNE X7s PRO Class-A | Sennheiser HD58X

Schiit Rekkr ELAC BS243.3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2023 at 1:18 AM, BotDamian said:

So me having 14k credits is 2 cores running while the CPU shows that it runs on all cores? I'm confused.

some projects do better with higher clock speed. then ones that do better multi core. think thread ripper.

 

MSI x399 sli plus  | AMD theardripper 2990wx all core 3ghz lock |Thermaltake flo ring 360 | EVGA 2080, Zotac 2080 |Gskill Ripjaws 128GB 3000 MHz | Corsair RM1200i |150tb | Asus tuff gaming mid tower| 10gb NIC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×