Jump to content

New Mac Mini M1 chip and compatibility

The older Mac Minis used Intel CPUs that were based on x86 architecture. The latest Mac Mini has M1 chip and doesn't have a CPU with x86 architecture. How is the software and operating system compatible with the new chip? I just don't get how this architecture works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you look ata any of the public info out there for how they mke it work?

 

The os has arm and x86 builds, depends on the device.

 

Software is either native, or runs in a emulator. Most software will work fine with the emulator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

Did you look ata any of the public info out there for how they mke it work?

 

The os has arm and x86 builds, depends on the device.

 

Software is either native, or runs in a emulator. Most software will work fine with the emulator.

I was too lazy. I just found this:

 

Quote

Rosetta 2 dynamic binary translation technology enables M1-equipped products to run software built for Intel x86 CPUs.

Source: Wikipedia article about Apple M1, Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_M1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically Apple made MacOS work with ARM, and some developers are adding support for ARM as well. If it's not supported by ARM then it gets translated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basicly there are 3 mode of operation:
- native apps, use ARM code, no emulation needed, this is the fastest.  This is how all the mac software eventually programmed.

- universal apps, can be use with both ARM and x86. no need for emulation.

- rosetta 2, x86 apps running with emulation, this will be the slowest theoretically.

 

Looking at the reviews Rosetta 2 emulation is pretty good.

Usually emulated software runs at 20-50% the native speed, we see Rosetta 2 emulated software to be around 50-80%, which is amazing.

If you're looking to buy an apple computers, definitely go for the M1.

Ryzen 5700g @ 4.4ghz all cores | Asrock B550M Steel Legend | 3060 | 2x 16gb Micron E 2666 @ 4200mhz cl16 | 500gb WD SN750 | 12 TB HDD | Deepcool Gammax 400 w/ 2 delta 4000rpm push pull | Antec Neo Eco Zen 500w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, elsandosgrande said:

This makes me wonder what the Linux support will be like.

Linus Torvalds, the guy who makes Linux, said he would like there to be Linux support. But Apple isn't cooperative and he work work with companies that don't want to work with them too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, elsandosgrande said:

This makes me wonder what the Linux support will be like.

If it is anything like what we have right now it probably won't be great. Linux on Macs with the T2 chip is a pain. 

Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Coolmaster said:

Linus Torvalds, the guy who makes Linux, said he would like there to be Linux support. But Apple isn't cooperative and he work work with companies that don't want to work with them too.

The only reason why I'll never buy a Mac. I'd be really curious to see what this ARM chip is really capable of (and MacMini is actually not that expensive), but all those hardware and software locks are simply offensive and disrespectful towards customers. And let them shut up about "security", none of their customers is a James Bond who would actually need their stuff to be unhackable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×