Anyone playing Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla?

[GamerBlake]

I’m just wondering what others think of the game so far?

 

I’ve got about 5 hours of playtime so far and while I do like the time period & story..I think it does have some big problems too.

 

I think the combat is rather clunky and ridiculous compared to AC: Odyssey and I think the performance of the game is the worst I’ve ever seen.

 

Im running an OC’ed 8700K + an OC’ed 2080 Ti and I can’t get over 85 fps @ 1440p no matter what graphics settings I play on. Whether it’s low, medium, high or ultra it’s always 85 FPS max with dips as low as 45 happening regularly.

 

Anyway just wondering what others think and if anyone else is having these same issues?

 

Thanks!

[Fasauceome]

considering the only praise I've heard about this game is from paid showcases, I can believe this.

[dizmo]

As soon as I heard that dual wielding weapons didn't increase damage output I lost all interest.

If they fuck up something that basic (whether it's on purpose or not), I don't even want to wade into the potential mess of other things they fucked up.

[GamerBlake]

28 minutes ago, Fasauceome said:

considering the only praise I've heard about this game is from paid showcases, I can believe this.

It’s not all bad though. Not by a long shot.

 

There’s a lot of good ideas in the game I just feel they didn’t polish it up before release.

 

It feels like playing a beta version of the game where the devs are still unaware of lots of bugs.

 

When I was about an hour into the game I jumped onto a tree and got stuck and then ended up dying stuck in a tree.

[GamerBlake]

9 minutes ago, dizmo said:

As soon as I heard that dual wielding weapons didn't increase damage output I lost all interest.

If they fuck up something that basic (whether it's on purpose or not), I don't even want to wade into the potential mess of other things they fucked up.

I use a shield & axe so I don’t really know how the dual wielding stuff works.

 

I do know the skill tree has perks that give you special abilities if you’re dual wielding.

[Ebony Falcon]

1 hour ago, GamerBlake said:

I’m just wondering what others think of the game so far?

 

I’ve got about 5 hours of playtime so far and while I do like the time period & story..I think it does have some big problems too.

 

I think the combat is rather clunky and ridiculous compared to AC: Odyssey and I think the performance of the game is the worst I’ve ever seen.

 

Im running an OC’ed 8700K + an OC’ed 2080 Ti and I can’t get over 85 fps @ 1440p no matter what graphics settings I play on. Whether it’s low, medium, high or ultra it’s always 85 FPS max with dips as low as 45 happening regularly.

 

Anyway just wondering what others think and if anyone else is having these same issues?

 

Thanks!

We have same set up 8700k 2080ti 

it’s something on ur pc bro because I’m getting between 80 and 110 FPS with hardwareunboxed settings 

[GamerBlake]

24 minutes ago, Ebony Falcon said:

We have same set up 8700k 2080ti 

it’s something on ur pc bro because I’m getting between 80 and 110 FPS with hardwareunboxed settings 

It’s definitely not my PC.

 

If it was my PC it wouldn’t just be one game.

 

When I play AC: Odyssey I get much better fps.

 

The weird thing is when I play AC: Valhalla my CPU is only 60-70% utilized and my GPU is only 75% utilized so it’s something wrong with the game itself.

[GamerBlake]

36 minutes ago, WikiForce said:

can't even play it on my 750 ti because it doesn't natively supports dx12

I wouldn’t recommend a 750 Ti even if it did work.

 

Even if you played at 720p with lowest settings possible you might eek out a whopping 20fps.

 

My little cousin has an ASUS 760 and he was getting 28 FPS on low settings at 720p.

 

My brother has my old 1070 Ti and plays @ 1080p with lowest settings he was getting 35 FPS.

[GamerBlake]

27 minutes ago, WikiForce said:

yeah the game is terribly optimized but due to 750 ti being on newer maxwell architecture compared to kepler on 760, it does perform significantly better in certain scenarios, it has some newer tech which gives it an edge compared to older cards in lots of newer games

I don’t think it would have an edge over a 1070 Ti though right?

[Ebony Falcon]

10 hours ago, GamerBlake said:

It’s definitely not my PC.

 

If it was my PC it wouldn’t just be one game.

 

When I play AC: Odyssey I get much better fps.

 

The weird thing is when I play AC: Valhalla my CPU is only 60-70% utilized and my GPU is only 75% utilized so it’s something wrong with the game itself.

Then Why do I have the same specs and my pc is running it easily, it’s the best most optimised ac Iv played 

 

u  cant argue it’s not ur pc when we have same specs and it running great on mine 

[GamerBlake]

40 minutes ago, Ebony Falcon said:

Then Why do I have the same specs and my pc is running it easily, it’s the best most optimised ac Iv played 

 

u  cant argue it’s not ur pc when we have same specs and it running great on mine 

What are your graphics settings? Also what resolution are you playing at?

[Ebony Falcon]

40 minutes ago, GamerBlake said:

What are your graphics settings? Also what resolution are you playing at?

1440 same as you 

[GamerBlake]

On 11/14/2020 at 2:21 AM, Ebony Falcon said:

1440 same as you 

Hmm looks like you have Adaptive Quality on and I don’t.  

[Ebony Falcon]

55 minutes ago, GamerBlake said:

Hmm looks like you have Adaptive Quality on and I don’t.  

No leave it off mate 

[GamerBlake]

11 minutes ago, Ebony Falcon said:

No leave it off mate 

But then doesn’t it cap it at 60 FPS?

[Ebony Falcon]

10 minutes ago, GamerBlake said:

But then doesn’t it cap it at 60 FPS?

No, go screen settings and disable vsync

set render to 100 

refresh to max ur screen 

and leave adaptive quality off 

[GamerBlake]

10 minutes ago, Ebony Falcon said:

No, go screen settings and disable vsync

set render to 100 

refresh to max ur screen 

and leave adaptive quality off 

Leave adaptive quality off??

 I thought yours is on?

[Ebony Falcon]

19 minutes ago, GamerBlake said:

Leave adaptive quality off??

 I thought yours is on?

No it’s the only setting I didn’t copy because if ur over 60 it turns a to high which causes a dip and it drops back etc bouncing the frame rate around 

[GamerBlake]

1 hour ago, Ebony Falcon said:

No it’s the only setting I didn’t copy because if ur over 60 it turns a to high which causes a dip and it drops back etc bouncing the frame rate around 

Oh ok I’ll try that.

[GamerBlake]

1 hour ago, Ebony Falcon said:

No it’s the only setting I didn’t copy because if ur over 60 it turns a to high which causes a dip and it drops back etc bouncing the frame rate around 

So I did all the settings like you said and I’m getting 87 FPS where I’m standing right now.

[Ebony Falcon]

6 hours ago, GamerBlake said:

So I did all the settings like you said and I’m getting 87 FPS where I’m standing right now.

Ok so u should have between 70 and 90 FPS most the time now 

[GamerBlake]

2 hours ago, Ebony Falcon said:

Ok so u should have between 70 and 90 FPS most the time now 

It really depends on where I am.

 

Whenever I do a raid and there is lots of fighting it will drop down to 40-45 FPS.

 

The only possible thing I can think of slowing it down is possibly my RAM. It’s 3200 MHz overclocked to 3600.

[Wheresmehammer]

It's a shame really, but i think Ubisoft are milking the franchise to death.

[Ebony Falcon]

6 hours ago, Wheresmehammer said:

It's a shame really, but i think Ubisoft are milking the franchise to death.

Really for me it’s been the best optimised game at launch Iv played and the the best game so far in the series 

[Wheresmehammer]

1 minute ago, Ebony Falcon said:

Really for me it’s been the best optimised game at launch Iv played and the the best game so far in the series 

Your framerate on a 2080Ti at 1440P is quite bad when a console can run it at 4K 60 with a much lesser GPU.