NO THE fx-9590 is not better than the 4930k!

[Umeshwarnath]

seen a lot of posts asking this! for gods sake , the 9590 isn't better than a 4930k at streaming....not at streaming not at anything! hope this answers all your questions! you get what you pay for!

have a good day!

[DarrenP]

for gods sake , the 9590 isn't better than a 4930k at streaming....not at streaming not at anything! hope this answers all your questions! have a good day!

So where is the point of this post?

[coen113]

maybe its because the bloody 4930k is about 3 times more expensive and you can expect alteast some improvement for you dollars

[Jamdude]

Did anyone think it was in the first place?

[ANUPLUCIFERGAMER]

Yeah, so? What's the point of this thread? This doesn't even deserve Off-topic

[Syraz]

So where is the point of this post?

 

Think in regards to the couple 9590 post that have been made this morning..

[DarrenP]

maybe its because the bloody 4930k is about 3 times more expensive and you can expect alteast some improvement for you dollars

[Vindola]

seen a lot of posts asking this! for gods sake , the 9590 isn't better than a 4930k at streaming....not at streaming not at anything! hope this answers all your questions! you get what you pay for!

have a good day!

 

[Umeshwarnath]

maybe its because the bloody 4930k is about 3 times more expensive and you can expect alteast some improvement for you dollars

3 times? 329 vs 579! but ye! you are correct ...the prices speak for themselves!

[Umeshwarnath]

Think in regards to the couple 9590 post that have been made this morning..

couple?

[Umeshwarnath]

dam straight he is! more like "almost 2 times" but ..thats the point!

[Lord Pantaloons]

I see no reason why this thread should exist so here is a thing because: Reasons

[s3ns3]

yeah we know 

[Umeshwarnath]

Did anyone think it was in the first place?

yeah! apparently quite a few!

[Theo]

Did anyone think it was in the first place?

Logan said it on one of his last videos so obviously blind sheep follow him

[Umeshwarnath]

I see no reason why this thread should exist so here is a thing because: Reasons

if you see.....there are quite a few threads regarding this! quite a few is an under statement!

[nsyedhasan]

The 4930K has more thread and also a higher IPC, so yeah.

[ciprian97pop]

don't you say

[Umeshwarnath]

nice! humanity still has hope!

[Jamdude]

Logan said it on one of his last videos so obviously blind sheep follow him

Oh, thanks, I'm a bit behind in watching YouTube videos.

[s3ns3]

maybe you heard that when the fx 9590 was A 1000$ CPU. thats was a rob right there and amd you should be ashamed . its like nvidia cherry picking gtx 780s and sell them for 2000$ under a false name

[madknight3]

It's probably because people see higher clock speed and more cores on the 9590. To the average person, that means it's better.

[Lord Pantaloons]

if you see.....there are quite a few threads regarding this! quite a few is an under statement!

Regardless of how many threads there are about it the fact remains that the 9590 can't even begin to come close to a 4930k and anyone who believes otherwise has the same infantile grasp of CPU's that AMD has.

[Umeshwarnath]

Regardless of how many threads there are about it the fact remains that the 9590 can't even begin to come close to a 4930k and anyone who believes otherwise has the same infantile grasp of CPU's that AMD has.

you sir ,just made my day with that comment!

2 people just got burnt!

[Guest GRRigger]

yup, the fact is, any amd 8 core looses against 4 core non hyperthreaded ivy and haswell at the same clock speed. yes, its that horrible, on top of 200w tdp.

but its true, 4670k @5ghz is rare we cant say that for 3570k tho.

its true, just insanely good sample, overclocked 8350