Jump to content

sata or m2

the undying maze

hi guys im kinda confused should i go with 860 evo sata or  860 evo m2 and they are in the same price + ther is crucial mx 500 with sata and m2 and cheaper by 10 dollar at best pls give me the best advise im really confused my entire life was hdd now its gonna change want the best change possible :thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, the undying maze said:

hi guys im kinda confused should i go with 860 evo sata or  860 evo m2 and they are in the same price + ther is crucial mx 500 with sata and m2 and cheaper by 10 dollar at best pls give me the best advise im really confused my entire life was hdd now its gonna change want the best change possible :thanks

With the 860 evo. It doesn't matter which one you get as they're both the same speed unlike later Samsung drives. With the Crucial, you'll give up some writes, but it should work almost exactly the same if you're trying to save money. Just be careful of DRAM-Less SSDs as those kinds are shit.

PLEASE QUOTE ME IF YOU ARE REPLYING TO ME

Desktop Build: Ryzen 7 2700X @ 4.0GHz, AsRock Fatal1ty X370 Professional Gaming, 48GB Corsair DDR4 @ 3000MHz, RX5700 XT 8GB Sapphire Nitro+, Benq XL2730 1440p 144Hz FS

Retro Build: Intel Pentium III @ 500 MHz, Dell Optiplex G1 Full AT Tower, 768MB SDRAM @ 133MHz, Integrated Graphics, Generic 1024x768 60Hz Monitor


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theroretically NVME is faster, but from my understanding (I don't have the ability to use m.2 on my current platform), it's generally unnoticeable.

If they're the same price, i'd opt for the M.2 as it's completely self contained, helps with cable and space management.

Either the 860 evo or the MX500 are both very solid options. Take your pick.

~Remember to quote posts to continue support on your thread~
-Don't be this kind of person-

CPU:  AMD Ryzen 7 5800x | RAM: 2x16GB Crucial Ripjaws Z | Cooling: XSPC/EK/Bitspower loop | MOBO: Gigabyte x570 Aorus Master | PSU: Seasonic Prime 750 Titanium  

SSD: 250GB Samsung 980 PRO (OS) | 1TB Crucial MX500| 2TB Crucial P2 | Case: Phanteks Evolv X | GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 (with EK Block) | HDD: 1x Seagate Barracuda 2TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rcmaehl said:

With the 860 evo. It doesn't matter which one you get as they're both the same speed unlike later Samsung drives. With the Crucial, you'll give up some writes, but it should work almost exactly the same if you're trying to save money. Just be careful of DRAM-Less SSDs as those kinds are shit.

one thing i didnt dram-less ssds what is it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, the undying maze said:

one thing i didnt dram-less ssds what is it ?

 

PLEASE QUOTE ME IF YOU ARE REPLYING TO ME

Desktop Build: Ryzen 7 2700X @ 4.0GHz, AsRock Fatal1ty X370 Professional Gaming, 48GB Corsair DDR4 @ 3000MHz, RX5700 XT 8GB Sapphire Nitro+, Benq XL2730 1440p 144Hz FS

Retro Build: Intel Pentium III @ 500 MHz, Dell Optiplex G1 Full AT Tower, 768MB SDRAM @ 133MHz, Integrated Graphics, Generic 1024x768 60Hz Monitor


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Semper said:

Theroretically NVME is faster, but from my understanding (I don't have the ability to use m.2 on my current platform), it's generally unnoticeable.

If they're the same price, i'd opt for the M.2 as it's completely self contained, helps with cable and space management.

Either the 860 evo or the MX500 are both very solid options. Take your pick.

ik they kinda good so i better go with m2 version then  the only diffrence between samsung and crucial are only 7 dollar honestly im in very tight budget and ever dollar count and her is my build give me your openion and thanks https://pcpartpicker.com/user/ningagaiden/saved/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's better to think of m.2 as the form factor, rather than it's interface... as m.2 drives come in both SATA and NVME "flavours", which is the actual way that they communicate with the CPU/motherboard.

You'll probably be fine with a regular SATA SSD, so you only have to think whether you'd like it to be m.2 or 2.5" SSD form factor. The m.2 fits right onto the mobo and doesn't require any leads, the 2.5" requires being connected to the PSU and mobo with leads.

Please quote my post, or put @paddy-stone if you want me to respond to you.

Spoiler
  • PCs:- 
  • Main PC build  https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/2K6Q7X
  • ASUS x53e  - i7 2670QM / Sony BD writer x8 / Win 10, Elemetary OS, Ubuntu/ Samsung 830 SSD
  • Lenovo G50 - 8Gb RAM - Samsung 860 Evo 250GB SSD - DVD writer
  •  
  • Displays:-
  • Philips 55 OLED 754 model
  • Panasonic 55" 4k TV
  • LG 29" Ultrawide
  • Philips 24" 1080p monitor as backup
  •  
  • Storage/NAS/Servers:-
  • ESXI/test build  https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/4wyR9G
  • Main Server https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/3Qftyk
  • Backup server - HP Proliant Gen 8 4 bay NAS running FreeNAS ZFS striped 3x3TiB WD reds
  • HP ProLiant G6 Server SE316M1 Twin Hex Core Intel Xeon E5645 2.40GHz 48GB RAM
  •  
  • Gaming/Tablets etc:-
  • Xbox One S 500GB + 2TB HDD
  • PS4
  • Nvidia Shield TV
  • Xiaomi/Pocafone F2 pro 8GB/256GB
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4

 

  • Unused Hardware currently :-
  • 4670K MSI mobo 16GB ram
  • i7 6700K  b250 mobo
  • Zotac GTX 1060 6GB Amp! edition
  • Zotac GTX 1050 mini

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, paddy-stone said:

It's better to think of m.2 as the form factor, rather than it's interface... as m.2 drives come in both SATA and NVME "flavours", which is the actual way that they communicate with the CPU/motherboard.

You'll probably be fine with a regular SATA SSD, so you only have to think whether you'd like it to be m.2 or 2.5" SSD form factor. The m.2 fits right onto the mobo and doesn't require any leads, the 2.5" requires being connected to the PSU and mobo with leads.

so is 860 evo 2.5 ssd better then crucial m2 sata ssd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, the undying maze said:

so is 860 evo 2.5 ssd better then crucial m2 sata ssd?

They're the same, just different form factor...

 

[edit] but of the 2 I'd go with the Samsung. It may have better longevity maybe. Especially as you didn't mention the actual Crucial model.

Please quote my post, or put @paddy-stone if you want me to respond to you.

Spoiler
  • PCs:- 
  • Main PC build  https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/2K6Q7X
  • ASUS x53e  - i7 2670QM / Sony BD writer x8 / Win 10, Elemetary OS, Ubuntu/ Samsung 830 SSD
  • Lenovo G50 - 8Gb RAM - Samsung 860 Evo 250GB SSD - DVD writer
  •  
  • Displays:-
  • Philips 55 OLED 754 model
  • Panasonic 55" 4k TV
  • LG 29" Ultrawide
  • Philips 24" 1080p monitor as backup
  •  
  • Storage/NAS/Servers:-
  • ESXI/test build  https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/4wyR9G
  • Main Server https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/3Qftyk
  • Backup server - HP Proliant Gen 8 4 bay NAS running FreeNAS ZFS striped 3x3TiB WD reds
  • HP ProLiant G6 Server SE316M1 Twin Hex Core Intel Xeon E5645 2.40GHz 48GB RAM
  •  
  • Gaming/Tablets etc:-
  • Xbox One S 500GB + 2TB HDD
  • PS4
  • Nvidia Shield TV
  • Xiaomi/Pocafone F2 pro 8GB/256GB
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4

 

  • Unused Hardware currently :-
  • 4670K MSI mobo 16GB ram
  • i7 6700K  b250 mobo
  • Zotac GTX 1060 6GB Amp! edition
  • Zotac GTX 1050 mini

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, paddy-stone said:

They're the same, just different form factor.

so what would you recomond  knowing the crucial m2 sata is cheaper by 7 dollar then 860 evo 2.5 nand ssd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, the undying maze said:

so what would you recomond  knowing the crucial m2 sata is cheaper by 7 dollar then 860 evo 2.5 nand ssd

For the sake of 7 dollars, I'd go with the Samsung. But real world speeds probably won't notice any difference.

Please quote my post, or put @paddy-stone if you want me to respond to you.

Spoiler
  • PCs:- 
  • Main PC build  https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/2K6Q7X
  • ASUS x53e  - i7 2670QM / Sony BD writer x8 / Win 10, Elemetary OS, Ubuntu/ Samsung 830 SSD
  • Lenovo G50 - 8Gb RAM - Samsung 860 Evo 250GB SSD - DVD writer
  •  
  • Displays:-
  • Philips 55 OLED 754 model
  • Panasonic 55" 4k TV
  • LG 29" Ultrawide
  • Philips 24" 1080p monitor as backup
  •  
  • Storage/NAS/Servers:-
  • ESXI/test build  https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/4wyR9G
  • Main Server https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/3Qftyk
  • Backup server - HP Proliant Gen 8 4 bay NAS running FreeNAS ZFS striped 3x3TiB WD reds
  • HP ProLiant G6 Server SE316M1 Twin Hex Core Intel Xeon E5645 2.40GHz 48GB RAM
  •  
  • Gaming/Tablets etc:-
  • Xbox One S 500GB + 2TB HDD
  • PS4
  • Nvidia Shield TV
  • Xiaomi/Pocafone F2 pro 8GB/256GB
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4

 

  • Unused Hardware currently :-
  • 4670K MSI mobo 16GB ram
  • i7 6700K  b250 mobo
  • Zotac GTX 1060 6GB Amp! edition
  • Zotac GTX 1050 mini

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, paddy-stone said:

For the sake of 7 dollars, I'd go with the Samsung. But real world speeds probably won't notice any difference.

ok mate thanks lot thats what i wanted to hear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×