Ryzen 3000 16 cores @ 5.1Ghz

[Turtle Rig]

Looks like May 2019 were going to have a 32 thread desktop for 500 dollars and all running at 5.1Ghz ....... drools

 

Ryzen 3 3300	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	6/12	50W	$99	CES
Ryzen 3 3300X	3.5GHz	4.3GHz	6/12	65W	$129	CES
Ryzen 3 3300G	3.0GHz	3.8GHz	6/12	65W	$129	Q3 2019
Ryzen 5 3600	3.6GHz	4.4GHz	8/16	65W	$178	CES
Ryzen 5 3600X	4.0GHz	4.8GHz	8/16	95W	$229	CES
Ryzen 5 3600G	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	8/16	95W	$199	Q3 2019
Ryzen 7 3700	3.8GHz	4.6GHz	12/24	95W	$299	CES
Ryzen 7 3700X	4.2GHz	5.0GHz	12/24	105W	$329	CES
Ryzen 9 3800X	3.9GHz	4.7GHz	16/32	125W	$449	CES
Ryzen 9 3850X	4.3GHz	5.1GHz	16/32	135W	$499	May 2019

[Fasauceome]

Biiiiiiiiig grain of salt but ok

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Turtle Rig said:

Looks like May 2019 were going to have a 32 thread desktop for 500 dollars and all running at 5.1Ghz ....... drools

 

Ryzen 3 3300	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	6/12	50W	$99	CES
Ryzen 3 3300X	3.5GHz	4.3GHz	6/12	65W	$129	CES
Ryzen 3 3300G	3.0GHz	3.8GHz	6/12	65W	$129	Q3 2019
Ryzen 5 3600	3.6GHz	4.4GHz	8/16	65W	$178	CES
Ryzen 5 3600X	4.0GHz	4.8GHz	8/16	95W	$229	CES
Ryzen 5 3600G	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	8/16	95W	$199	Q3 2019
Ryzen 7 3700	3.8GHz	4.6GHz	12/24	95W	$299	CES
Ryzen 7 3700X	4.2GHz	5.0GHz	12/24	105W	$329	CES
Ryzen 9 3800X	3.9GHz	4.7GHz	16/32	125W	$449	CES
Ryzen 9 3850X	4.3GHz	5.1GHz	16/32	135W	$499	May 2019

Can I ask where you found this information? A 16 core Ryzen CPU would be absolute awesome.

[Turtle Rig]

From here reputable site.  Guru3D Ryzen 3000

[NelizMastr]

1 minute ago, Turtle Rig said:

From here reputable site.  Guru3D Ryzen 3000

They link to WCCFTech, the biggest salt mountain in tech news  

[Turtle Rig]

Just now, NelizMastr said:

They link to WCCFTech, the biggest salt mountain in tech news  

sighs,,,,  5.1Ghz 32 threads for 500 bones,,,, while a Intel 8 core costs 100 bucks more then that lol,

[NelizMastr]

Just now, Turtle Rig said:

sighs,,,,  5.1Ghz 32 threads for 500 bones,,,, while a Intel 8 core costs 100 bucks more then that lol,

Not saying it's a bad proposition, in fact, it's really not. But it's not very realistic. Considering the early numbers from Epyc engineering samples, that jump might be a bit too good to be true. I reckon they'll keep the current core count and then the speeds become more attainable.

[Vasllo]

Going from 4.2-4.3 to 5.1GHz is one architecture change is too much hope, I doubt it. If it reaches 4.7GHz when overclocked, that would be a great leap, but 5.1GHz will be DICE territory at least.

[Turtle Rig]

1 minute ago, NelizMastr said:

Not saying it's a bad proposition, in fact, it's really not. But it's not very realistic. Considering the early numbers from Epyc engineering samples, that jump might be a bit too good to be true. I reckon they'll keep the current core count and then the speeds become more attainable.

Thanks for your input on this Neliz..Ya your right 5.1Ghz for all 16 cores and 500 bucks seems whack.........

[Vasllo]

Jesus, common, this list is 110% BS: 12 threads on a Ryzen 3? It doesn't make any sense whatsoever for them to increase core count in the whole range, they already have more than enough cores through the stack, they just need higher clocks.

 

Ryzen 3 3300	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	6/12	50W	$99	CES
Ryzen 3 3300X	3.5GHz	4.3GHz	6/12	65W	$129	CES
Ryzen 3 3300G	3.0GHz	3.8GHz	6/12	65W	$129	Q3 2019
Ryzen 5 3600	3.6GHz	4.4GHz	8/16	65W	$178	CES
Ryzen 5 3600X	4.0GHz	4.8GHz	8/16	95W	$229	CES
Ryzen 5 3600G	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	8/16	95W	$199	Q3 2019
Ryzen 7 3700	3.8GHz	4.6GHz	12/24	95W	$299	CES
Ryzen 7 3700X	4.2GHz	5.0GHz	12/24	105W	$329	CES
Ryzen 9 3800X	3.9GHz	4.7GHz	16/32	125W	$449	CES
Ryzen 9 3850X	4.3GHz	5.1GHz	16/32	135W	$499	May 2019

[mexican-bum]

5 minutes ago, Vasllo said:

Jesus, common, this list is 110% BS: 12 threads on a Ryzen 3? It doesn't make any sense whatsoever for them to increase core count in the whole range, they already have more than enough cores through the stack, they just need higher clocks.

 

Ryzen 3 3300	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	6/12	50W	$99	CES
Ryzen 3 3300X	3.5GHz	4.3GHz	6/12	65W	$129	CES
Ryzen 3 3300G	3.0GHz	3.8GHz	6/12	65W	$129	Q3 2019
Ryzen 5 3600	3.6GHz	4.4GHz	8/16	65W	$178	CES
Ryzen 5 3600X	4.0GHz	4.8GHz	8/16	95W	$229	CES
Ryzen 5 3600G	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	8/16	95W	$199	Q3 2019
Ryzen 7 3700	3.8GHz	4.6GHz	12/24	95W	$299	CES
Ryzen 7 3700X	4.2GHz	5.0GHz	12/24	105W	$329	CES
Ryzen 9 3800X	3.9GHz	4.7GHz	16/32	125W	$449	CES
Ryzen 9 3850X	4.3GHz	5.1GHz	16/32	135W	$499	May 2019

 

Due to the way zen 2 epyc is made which is the same chiplet dies ryzen will be they might as well increase core count..... would be a waste to just disable perfectly good cores on the die

[AngryBeaver]

25 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

Looks like May 2019 were going to have a 32 thread desktop for 500 dollars and all running at 5.1Ghz ....... drools

 

Ryzen 3 3300	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	6/12	50W	$99	CES
Ryzen 3 3300X	3.5GHz	4.3GHz	6/12	65W	$129	CES
Ryzen 3 3300G	3.0GHz	3.8GHz	6/12	65W	$129	Q3 2019
Ryzen 5 3600	3.6GHz	4.4GHz	8/16	65W	$178	CES
Ryzen 5 3600X	4.0GHz	4.8GHz	8/16	95W	$229	CES
Ryzen 5 3600G	3.2GHz	4.0GHz	8/16	95W	$199	Q3 2019
Ryzen 7 3700	3.8GHz	4.6GHz	12/24	95W	$299	CES
Ryzen 7 3700X	4.2GHz	5.0GHz	12/24	105W	$329	CES
Ryzen 9 3800X	3.9GHz	4.7GHz	16/32	125W	$449	CES
Ryzen 9 3850X	4.3GHz	5.1GHz	16/32	135W	$499	May 2019

See the items I highlighted in red. Look at the base clocks. I can understand them wanting to raise the boost clocks on higher end models, but the base clock doesn't make sense.

 

As core count increases normally you see a lower base clock, because of the amount of heat and power generated on these chips when all cores are running full out. The base clock is the lowest clocks would drop in that scenario. Lets compare it to their threadripper line which would be the best comparison to this.

 

 

As core count is reduced we see the base block come up as well as the boost clock... the only exception is the 2920x and I think this was more of a pricing move to push people to the 2950x. I marked out the older threadrippers. But if you look you will see the base clock works the same way there.

 

This is why I believe all of this "Leaked" information is all make up crap. There might be a slight grain of truth somewhere, but it isn't on actual cpu specs.

[Turtle Rig]

1 minute ago, AngryBeaver said:

See the items I highlighted in red. Look at the base clocks. I can understand them wanting to raise the boost clocks on higher end models, but the base clock doesn't make sense.

 

As core count increases normally you see a lower base clock, because of the amount of heat and power generated on these chips when all cores are running full out. The base clock is the lowest clocks would drop in that scenario. Lets compare it to their threadripper line which would be the best comparison to this.

 

 

As core count is reduced we see the base block come up as well as the boost clock... the only exception is the 2920x and I think this was more of a pricing move to push people to the 2950x. I marked out the older threadrippers. But if you look you will see the base clock works the same way there.

 

This is why I believe all of this "Leaked" information is all make up crap. There might be a slight grain of truth somewhere, but it isn't on actual cpu specs.

Leave if to Beaver, nice post my friend.

[Vasllo]

On 12/5/2018 at 1:25 PM, mexican-bum said:

Due to the way zen 2 epyc is made which is the same chiplet dies ryzen will be they might as well increase core count..... would be a waste to just disable perfectly good cores on the die

They need to segment de products, an unlocked R3 with 12 threads would be all you need for even high end systems, so they wouldn't sell high end CPUs. They need to make money at the end of the day, and they can't make miracles either, so those frequencies are not happening.