zMeul

the the GTX1070 numbers are pulled out of AMD's ass
some peeps on reddit got the more realistic GTX1070 numbers:
BF1: http://www.pcgamer.com/battlefield-1-performance-analysis/
Source: 105.3 FPS
Leaks: 72.2 FPS Civilization 6: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Civilization_6/4.html
Source: 83.8 FPS with 8x MSAA
Leaks: 72.2 FPS with 4x MSAA Doom 2016: https://www.techspot.com/review/1182-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070/page5.html
Source: 91 FPS
Leaks: 84.6 FPS yeah ...

or maybe it's 

the the GTX1070 numbers are pulled out of AMD's ass
some peeps on reddit got the more realistic GTX1070 numbers:
BF1: http://www.pcgamer.com/battlefield-1-performance-analysis/
Source: 105.3 FPS
Leaks: 72.2 FPS Civilization 6: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Civilization_6/4.html
Source: 83.8 FPS with 8x MSAA
Leaks: 72.2 FPS with 4x MSAA Doom 2016: https://www.techspot.com/review/1182-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070/page5.html
Source: 91 FPS
Leaks: 84.6 FPS yeah ...

or maybe it's 

the the GTX1070 numbers are pulled out of AMD's ass
some peeps on reddit got the more realistic GTX1070 numbers:
BF1: http://www.pcgamer.com/battlefield-1-performance-analysis/
Source: 105.3 FPS
Leaks: 72.2 FPS Civilization 6: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Civilization_6/4.html
Source: 83.8 FPS with 8x MSAA
Leaks: 72.2 FPS with 4x MSAA Doom 2016: https://www.techspot.com/review/1182-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070/page5.html
Source: 91 FPS
Leaks: 84.6 FPS yeah ...

or maybe it's 

AMD engineering at it's finest .. what a fucking joke

Sorry AMD Free Sync, Adaptive Sync, whatever else you want to call it. The shit NVidia charges up the ass for while AMD makes it cheap.

or maybe it's 

sums up everything wrong with LTT
 
people that go to LTT YT for reviews should look elsewhere

you buying the boxed version of that Ryzen, yes? ditch the Hyper 212 Intel 600p SSD - utter trash; get a 850 EVO/PRO you do not need a 750W PSU - something cheaper in the 550W range would do just fine LED crap

What server should I build to replace windows server 2003? I want a tower case server and I intend to install windows server 2016 on it and use it for Windows AD, files sharing and printer sharing. The windows server 2003 is currently serving ten Windows 10 workstations. Any recommendations? Many Thanks! Also if possible I want  A Xeon in it and hot-swap Hard drive capabilities, thanks!

Ryzen's getting pretty big, so I would suspect that games will start to be optimized for it pretty soon.

that's the lie said for the last 10y or so
so yeah, keep on dreaming

lol what!?
it's a brilliant move

correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Linux Kernel compiled under GCC? that's pretty fucking big

I do not know for sure, I don't wake up in the morning with the smell of fresh baked Linux Kernel
in case of Ryzen it might smell like smoldering bakelite 

Anyone know where to find the serial number on a dark rock 3, apart from the box. Need to order a AM4 kit.

They are so not trash... Just try to compare the amount of information they give you... The amount of time they put on the reviews.... Now whether they use comedic effect or not is up to you to watch, but find me one YouTube Chanel that post 1 Video per Day 365 days per year with this level of accuracy and professionalism in their reviews...
 
Spoiler Alert you cant
 

LTT's reviews since they moved their offices have turned to trash - even Linus with how own mouth said he's producing entertainment and not reviews
and it's quite baffling how a ginormous amount of floatplaners are new forum posters

except it's not the TIM that is the problem, it's the z height between the die and the IHS
but, no matter how many times this is told and repeated, here, on Anand and everywhere else ... you blame the TIM 

except it's not the TIM that is the problem, it's the z height between the die and the IHS
but, no matter how many times this is told and repeated, here, on Anand and everywhere else ... you blame the TIM 

except it's not the TIM that is the problem, it's the z height between the die and the IHS
but, no matter how many times this is told and repeated, here, on Anand and everywhere else ... you blame the TIM 

except it's not the TIM that is the problem, it's the z height between the die and the IHS
but, no matter how many times this is told and repeated, here, on Anand and everywhere else ... you blame the TIM 

except it's not the TIM that is the problem, it's the z height between the die and the IHS
but, no matter how many times this is told and repeated, here, on Anand and everywhere else ... you blame the TIM