Gymnastboatman
-
Posts
6 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from thechinchinsong in M1 Mac mini's with 10Gb ethernet listed in internal repair database
M1 Mac mini's with 10Gb ethernet listed in internal repair database
Linus just may get his wish after all. I suspected we might have to wait for an M1X Mac mini to get 10Gb but it looks like Apple is at least considering bolting 10Gb onto the M1 somehow. Here's hoping it will come out this year. There is a rumor about some sort of "Apple surprise" in December.....
Sources
https://www.macrumors.com/2020/11/20/apple-m1-mac-mini-10gb-ethernet-parts-list/
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Belgarathian in M1 Mac mini's with 10Gb ethernet listed in internal repair database
M1 Mac mini's with 10Gb ethernet listed in internal repair database
Linus just may get his wish after all. I suspected we might have to wait for an M1X Mac mini to get 10Gb but it looks like Apple is at least considering bolting 10Gb onto the M1 somehow. Here's hoping it will come out this year. There is a rumor about some sort of "Apple surprise" in December.....
Sources
https://www.macrumors.com/2020/11/20/apple-m1-mac-mini-10gb-ethernet-parts-list/
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Tamesh16 in M1 Mac mini's with 10Gb ethernet listed in internal repair database
M1 Mac mini's with 10Gb ethernet listed in internal repair database
Linus just may get his wish after all. I suspected we might have to wait for an M1X Mac mini to get 10Gb but it looks like Apple is at least considering bolting 10Gb onto the M1 somehow. Here's hoping it will come out this year. There is a rumor about some sort of "Apple surprise" in December.....
Sources
https://www.macrumors.com/2020/11/20/apple-m1-mac-mini-10gb-ethernet-parts-list/
-
.png "Funny")
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Kilrah in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from slippers_ in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Septimus in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from matrix07012 in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from tatte in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from PeterT in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Bananasplit_00 in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Beskamir in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Fnige in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from soldier_ph in Opera releases GAMING browser
Source
While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. ?
Be sure to read the title like this.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Allmykidsareblack in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
I slightly understand the 2x2 stuff, as is is just technically 2 10Gbps connections slapped together, instead of an evolution.
But who cares? 3, 3.1, and 3.2 would’ve sufficed. Agreed.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Juniiii in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
Macrumors article
USB 3.2 (20Gbps) has been rebranded to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, while also rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2, and rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Which was USB 3 prior to the EARLIER rebrand) into USB 3.2 Gen 1.
(Table in description might make that make more sense. Originally from Tom’s Hardware, shown in MacRumors article.)
Who put George Lucas in charge of the naming department?
Boy, I can’t wait to see this explanation on the WAN show.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from LambdaSystems in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
Macrumors article
USB 3.2 (20Gbps) has been rebranded to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, while also rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2, and rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Which was USB 3 prior to the EARLIER rebrand) into USB 3.2 Gen 1.
(Table in description might make that make more sense. Originally from Tom’s Hardware, shown in MacRumors article.)
Who put George Lucas in charge of the naming department?
Boy, I can’t wait to see this explanation on the WAN show.
-
Gymnastboatman reacted to bcredeur97 in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
at least the marketing terms "Superspeed USB 3.0 20Gbps" "Superspeed USB 3.0 10Gbps" etc aren't too bad.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Doobeedoo in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
Macrumors article
USB 3.2 (20Gbps) has been rebranded to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, while also rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2, and rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Which was USB 3 prior to the EARLIER rebrand) into USB 3.2 Gen 1.
(Table in description might make that make more sense. Originally from Tom’s Hardware, shown in MacRumors article.)
Who put George Lucas in charge of the naming department?
Boy, I can’t wait to see this explanation on the WAN show.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Sauron in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
Macrumors article
USB 3.2 (20Gbps) has been rebranded to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, while also rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2, and rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Which was USB 3 prior to the EARLIER rebrand) into USB 3.2 Gen 1.
(Table in description might make that make more sense. Originally from Tom’s Hardware, shown in MacRumors article.)
Who put George Lucas in charge of the naming department?
Boy, I can’t wait to see this explanation on the WAN show.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Crunchy Dragon in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
Macrumors article
USB 3.2 (20Gbps) has been rebranded to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, while also rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2, and rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Which was USB 3 prior to the EARLIER rebrand) into USB 3.2 Gen 1.
(Table in description might make that make more sense. Originally from Tom’s Hardware, shown in MacRumors article.)
Who put George Lucas in charge of the naming department?
Boy, I can’t wait to see this explanation on the WAN show.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from I-r0k in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
Macrumors article
USB 3.2 (20Gbps) has been rebranded to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, while also rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2, and rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Which was USB 3 prior to the EARLIER rebrand) into USB 3.2 Gen 1.
(Table in description might make that make more sense. Originally from Tom’s Hardware, shown in MacRumors article.)
Who put George Lucas in charge of the naming department?
Boy, I can’t wait to see this explanation on the WAN show.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from Cyb3rBlitzX in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
Macrumors article
USB 3.2 (20Gbps) has been rebranded to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, while also rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2, and rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Which was USB 3 prior to the EARLIER rebrand) into USB 3.2 Gen 1.
(Table in description might make that make more sense. Originally from Tom’s Hardware, shown in MacRumors article.)
Who put George Lucas in charge of the naming department?
Boy, I can’t wait to see this explanation on the WAN show.
-
Gymnastboatman reacted to TVwazhere in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
As a Kingdom Hearts fan, these names totally make sense to me :^)
-
Gymnastboatman reacted to Stefan Payne in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
Your logic is totally flawd.
Because USB 1.x <-> 2.x is compatible
Because USB 2.x <-> 3.x is compatible.
There has never been a break in compatibility with USB (yet).
Neither has there been with PCI, PCIe.
-
Gymnastboatman got a reaction from soldier_ph in USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Rebranding
Macrumors article
USB 3.2 (20Gbps) has been rebranded to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, while also rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2, and rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Which was USB 3 prior to the EARLIER rebrand) into USB 3.2 Gen 1.
(Table in description might make that make more sense. Originally from Tom’s Hardware, shown in MacRumors article.)
Who put George Lucas in charge of the naming department?
Boy, I can’t wait to see this explanation on the WAN show.
.png "Funny"){kind=small}
