Dr. KEK

I got downvoted to hell in r/nvidia for saying that before the 3080 was launched, I am frustrated I was right, but i find it funny this is the new norm

Sorry i couldn't hear you over my Klipsch audio system

I will take one, but you have to spell it Linus Sebaceous 

If only you could see all those pixels! Our goal at my workplace is to realize your best acuity. Optometry has fallen behind, but we are pushing. I see 20/8 and wish the rest of the world could see how true and crisp life can be

Lol keep your 1151 socket for minecraft ????
 
Just Turing card, lowest one they offer. Needed something solidworks certified. 
 
Spoiler alert: AMD still sucks. 1151 peons still jealous they made a stink "nobody needs PCIE lanes" and then NVME slapped them silly
 
Our C++ compiling machines run 4.8GHz 7800x, solidworks could use 2 more cores, so went with 7820x. 
 

Lol keep your 1151 socket for minecraft ????
 
Just Turing card, lowest one they offer. Needed something solidworks certified. 
 
Spoiler alert: AMD still sucks. 1151 peons still jealous they made a stink "nobody needs PCIE lanes" and then NVME slapped them silly
 
Our C++ compiling machines run 4.8GHz 7800x, solidworks could use 2 more cores, so went with 7820x. 
 

Gigabyte x299 ud4 pro
32gb 3000MHz Corsair DDR4(4x8gb)
i7 7820x
970 Pro NVME
 
Got to 4.3GHz on all 8 cores, 0 avx offset. Cooler bottlrneck, EVGA clc240
 

Gigabyte x299 ud4 pro
32gb 3000MHz Corsair DDR4(4x8gb)
i7 7820x
970 Pro NVME
 
Got to 4.3GHz on all 8 cores, 0 avx offset. Cooler bottlrneck, EVGA clc240
 

lol he probably dropped it as usual

i like the super clickbait of the title tough. 11/10 top memes.

Mmm... nothing? 

northbridge overclocked
 
 

but the whole optane thing is still about IOPS. Why the hell do you need throughput to grab 400,000 separate .asm files less than 1kb in size? I need IOPS to shove into RAM, compile, and dump the exe back to disk. 
 
I can post more in depth later about how I have overclocked the Uncore on my Xeon to increase the IOPS on a custom PCIE 1x NVME adapter I made myself. Intel uses 2x, so no overclocking needed. 
 
as for the average user workload, and who Optane is marketed to... you have CLEARLY NEVER LOADED A COMPLEX SOLIDWORKS ASSEMBLY. There are THOUSANDS of small .SLDPRT files to grab from disk. Endless workstation loads need IOPS from optane and not necessarily raw capacity or throughput.

Can't tell if troll or...
 
We've never said Optane technology makes no sense.
 
Intel is marketing this drive as a boot drive, which doesn't make a ton of sense compared to just buying a bigger SSD and a smaller/cheaper Optane module (which has already existed for nearly a year).

You may want to check Level1Techs' review of Optane, and see if their tests align with your predictions about intended audience.

LTT is not the forum for technical discussions of devices like this. You want to get into the dirty details, join ArsTechnica. They have actual Intel engineers posting there. LTT is for fanboys of OCing and wrecking expensive parts.

but the whole optane thing is still about IOPS. Why the hell do you need throughput to grab 400,000 separate .asm files less than 1kb in size? I need IOPS to shove into RAM, compile, and dump the exe back to disk. 
 
I can post more in depth later about how I have overclocked the Uncore on my Xeon to increase the IOPS on a custom PCIE 1x NVME adapter I made myself. Intel uses 2x, so no overclocking needed. 
 
as for the average user workload, and who Optane is marketed to... you have CLEARLY NEVER LOADED A COMPLEX SOLIDWORKS ASSEMBLY. There are THOUSANDS of small .SLDPRT files to grab from disk. Endless workstation loads need IOPS from optane and not necessarily raw capacity or throughput.

All working now?

This one is for electrical CAD work and some busywork in Solidworks, as well as c++ development.
 
Why? Because a Dell workstation configured properly is $6-8k. This is exactly what is required and just under $2k for all the parts on amazon. Realview graphics works with a driver tweak on the consumer gaming cards. Rx580 is cheaper than FirePro

The Manual for that Mobo seems to think you've got the ram in the wrong slots.
Should be in the 1st and 3rd on the left, and 2nd and 4th on the right. Not sure how much that matters though.

it's basically a 7600k, BUT 5.0 isn't guaranteed, i got 1 on sale for 159.99, it binned 4.9 but it was cheap, in a media pc now.
 
SL says 58%~ of 8350k will hit 5ghz
 
I'd pair it with a 1070 ti if i was to do a full build.

make the i7 a keychain. buy a x5650 for $40. overclock it. make sure your bios is updated. and be prepared for a clean windows install.

for anyone interested. wait a couple years.
 
rig 1: 4500mhz i7 7800x, rx580
rig 2: 4500mhz xeon x5650 rx480
rig 3: i3 laptop
 
this is only for multiworkload. the new instruction sets help the new chips, obviously.
 

meanwhile x58 build got NVME for program files. has cheaper ssd(mushkin reactor 240gb) for boot, and samsung evo 960 for pcie nvme. 

So the honest truth is wait for more money and do a platform upgrade. At this point any improvement you get will be negligible and quickly redundant due to where we are in the tech/upgrade cycle.
 
Take that $200 and just exercise some patience, go mow some lawns, sell some old stuff, do some chores and get enough to swap systems, because at this point spending more money into a platform that is not only old but has no valuable upgrade path would, in my opinion, be a poor spend of your hard earned cash.