Post your average FPS and system spec

[Bakedpanda]

I'm using a 7820x, 32gb RAM, 1060 6GB (I've got a 2080 Ti FE on preorder, not sure if I'll regret that), and game intstall on 960 EVO NVMe. I'm getting under 40 FPS @1080 regardless of quality settings.

 

Would be good to see what other people are getting.

[Bobdude81]

the game is a scam there is news about it im just glad i didn't give them my money a good rule is never give a company money till full release the poorly optimize game will never come to full release its a hard pill to swallow but that's just life.......:(

[Wauthar]

2 hours ago, Bobdude81 said:

the game is a scam there is news about it im just glad i didn't give them my money a good rule is never give a company money till full release the poorly optimize game will never come to full release its a hard pill to swallow but that's just life.......:(

It's the worst scam in history. They're using the funds of the backers to make an actual game  

[rentaspoon]

On 03/09/2018 at 8:32 PM, Bobdude81 said:

the game is a scam there is news about it im just glad i didn't give them my money a good rule is never give a company money till full release the poorly optimize game will never come to full release its a hard pill to swallow but that's just life.......:(

Yeah totally with you on that total scam, I mean they have released some gameplay of Squadron 42 and weekly and monthly updates, took the extra money and extended the scope, also lately took on extra staff to work on the current game release so that people have more to do. 

 

Total scam. 

 

And your right, don't give money to companies that need it who want to go against the grainand may have poor performance and only give money to companies that give you cookie cutter shooters every year. 

[Franck]

I7-950, 18 gb ddr3 1066 mhz, 680 gtx. running at 1080p at medium-low 40-45 fps.

[Guest]

I don’t have the game but sice op and another user have wildly different specs and similar frame rates, perhaps the frame rate is bound by the server like arma 3? 

[Ieviathan]

35-50 fps at port olisar & around the universe at high settings 1920x1080 .. 1080 ti strix, 8700k, 16gb ram

[Sealance]

Xeon W3680

Asus P6X58D-E Motherboard

36Gb DDR3

GTX970

Sata2 SSD (for SC)

 

getting about 20-35fps @1440p

 

@franck

get a sixcore xeon for that rig

[seriousseriouspunch]

8700k 5ghz GTX 1080 16gb DDR4 960EVO

 

Olisar. ship console room

@1440p

3.0       18fps (had to realize that 4930k oc 4.4ghz is a potato)

3.01     38fps   +-3    gpu usage 36-40%

3.1       50 fps  +-3

3.1.4    54fps   +-3

3.2       58 fps  +-3

3.3       80 fps  +-3    gpu usage 96%-100%

 

4k is gpu limited on GTX 1080 ever since they released ocs. 

[LevitatingBusinessMan]

@seriousseriouspunch now that's an extreme username

[CCSTech]

8350FX @4.0Ghz  / 850 EVO SSDs / 32GB DDR3 @2666 / win7 ultimate / auros 1080ti gaming edition (have also played with gtx770-4GB ed.)
Using an LG 34" monitor I run the game in normal space anywhere from 20fps to 65FPS.  Inside stations I have seen as much as 106FPS.
The game is now at 3.3.7 and has improved performance with OCS, but I found that running the game at a lower 720P setting seems to benefit lower end machines greatly.  A few minor details and textures are not visualized, but it is an easy trade off for the improved FPS.

[Zando_]

i5 8600K @5.1Ghz on an NH-D15S

ASUS Prime Z370-A

16GB G.Skill Ripjaws V 3000Mhz RAM

MSI Gaming X 1080 Ti

250GB 860 Evo SSD, 2TB Barracuda 7200rpm HDD

 

Mainly play Destiny 2 at 1080p ultra because I only have 1080p screens so far, averages uh, a lot of fps. It can keep up with my monitor at 180Hz easily, but I have it running at the stock 144Hz rn and if I lock the framerate to that it pretty much keeps 144Hz solid basically everywhere. 

 

Have another rig with an R7 2700X and Vega FE but that's not running rn, will be rebuilding that with a custom hardline watercooling loop. 

 

[Corwin111]

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/telemetry

 

Here's everyone's.

[kiwibacon]

40-60 fps @ 4k 2080ti /w 4790k. 16gig ram w/out overclocking

[Rhodan]

On 5/4/2019 at 7:03 AM, kiwibacon said:

40-60 fps @ 4k 2080ti /w 4790k. 16gig ram w/out overclocking

Seems like your CPU is bottlenecking your RTX 2080ti, you should consider to OC or upgrade CPU/MB/RAM maybe. On my Alienware Area-51m desktopreplacement I run an i7 9700K @ 5.00 GHz and a (Laptop) GTX 2070 which I ocd a bit. I get smooth 60-90 FPS depending on the situation.

[kiwibacon]

On 5/8/2019 at 1:44 AM, Rhodan said:

Seems like your CPU is bottlenecking your RTX 2080ti, you should consider to OC or upgrade CPU/MB/RAM maybe. On my Alienware Area-51m desktopreplacement I run an i7 9700K @ 5.00 GHz and a (Laptop) GTX 2070 which I ocd a bit. I get smooth 60-90 FPS depending on the situation.

Thank You.

After some investigation you seem correct.

Oh and task manager says cpu is 99% usage.

Going to get a 3800X prob next month.

 

 

[Xkillerpn]

 

 

Thats My system on it. The stuters are still part of the game after just loading, they need to fix that

[Lost_Listener]

i7-6700K @ 4.6Ghz with a corsair AIO H110i 

MSI Z170 Gaming M3 Mobo

32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum at 3200mhz

XFX Thicc Ultra III 5700 XT

850GQ EVGA PSU

32in AOC curved 4k gaming monitor 
Average 176 fps on Star Citizen Max settings @1080p with resolution scaling on
I guess the optimization has been going great! Too bad it's a "scam" lol big oof to that guy

[BlackManINC]

Pretty sure this game wouldn't run well at all with my PC, mainly due to my GPU being an RX 470. Its certainly starting to show its age in half of my games.