Jump to content
On 5/28/2018 at 8:52 AM, useffff said:

First of all, I dont like people saying some GPUs such as Volta are not meant for gaming. Any GPU you can use for gaming basically, its just price per performance. Anyway, I would get a new CPU, but not the I7-8700k. Thats a great CPU, but overkill for gaming. I would get the I7-7700k, that is plenty for games right now and later on down the road. Unless you plan on recording games and rendering, etc. Just get the 7700k and save yourself some money that you can use somewhere else on your PC.

actually i make videos so i think i need 8700k

 

On 5/28/2018 at 9:17 PM, airdeano said:

enough of the bickering amongst yourselves..

three pages of blah, blah, blah and no closer to helping the OP,  but your egos are swollen, get that checked out by a doctor, PLEASE!

im right, your wrong so there??

great scott!!

the E-PEEN level is 11 in here..

@NavySealC1 our apologies for this mess..

hahaha no worries i like to see this blah blah blah it's helping me some how

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2018 at 8:57 AM, Quadriplegic said:

Doesn't 8600k have same performance as 7700k while being cheaper?

The 8600k is better than the 7700k, even without hyperthreading.

On 5/28/2018 at 9:03 AM, useffff said:

From what I have seen, yes it dose. Thank you for pointing that out, the I7-7700k is $299 on Amazon and the I5-8600k is $238 on Amazon. So yes, the I5 has better performance than the 7700k overall but dose not have hyper threading if that will be an issue for him.

There's no reason to ever suggest a 7700k anymore. Quad core is low end now. Six real cores is way better than eight logical ones.

Make sure to quote or tag me (@JoostinOnline) or I won't see your response!

PSU Tier List  |  The Real Reason Delidding Improves Temperatures"2K" does not mean 2560×1440 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/29/2018 at 9:33 PM, StarKira said:

If your motherboard is from 2009, I would first look if that thing is compatible by any miracle, with the lastest i7 flagship cpu of the 8th generation

i know that what i meant bu upgreadint to 8700k i mean upgrade the CPU and The M-board

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NavySealC1 said:

i know that what i meant bu upgreadint to 8700k i mean upgrade the CPU and The M-board

If you decide to upgrade to the 8700k, you'll need a new motherboard, ram and you probably should upgrade the power supply too if it's also from 2009.

Intel Core i9-9980XE 18c/36t, Asus TUF X299 Mark 1, 128GB DDR4 3200MHz, Palit RTX 5070, 2TB 970 EVO Plus, 2TB SN570, 8TB HDD, Meshify 2

PC 2: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8c/16t, MSI X470 Carbon, 32GB DDR4 2666MHz, Asus GTX 1080 Strix, 512GB Samsung PM981, 1TB Crucial MX500, Fractal Define R4

Old PC: Intel Xeon X5670 6c/12t @ 4.40GHz, Asus P6X58D-E, 48GB DDR3 1600MHz, EVGA GTX 970 ACX 2.0, 500GB, 250GB & 120GB SSD, 10TB & 2x 4TB HDD, Fractal Define R5

PC 3: Intel Xeon E5-2690 8c/16t @ 3.3-3.8GHz, ThinkStation S30 (C602/X79), 64GB (4x 16GB) DDR3 1600MHz, Asus GeForce GTX 960 Turbo OC, 1TB Crucial MX500

Laptop: ThinkPad T440p, Intel Core i7-4800MQ 4c/8t @ 2.7-3.7GHz, 16GB DDR3 1600MHz, GeForce GT 730M (GPU: 1006MHz MEM: 1151MHz), 2TB SSD, 14" 1080p IPS, 100Wh battery

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S23 256GB Watch: Samsung Galaxy Watch7 44mm LTE

General X58 Xeon/i7 discussion

Some other PC's:

Spoiler

Some of the specs of these systems might not be up to date

Z77: Intel Core i7-3770 4c/8t @ 4.22-4.43GHz, Asus P8Z77-V LK, 32GB DDR3 1648MHz, Asus RX 470 Strix, 1TB & 250GB Crucial MX500 and 3x 500GB HDD

PC 4: Intel Xeon X5675 6c/12t @ 3.07-3.47GHz, HP 0B4Ch (X58), 12GB DDR3 1333MHz, Asus GeForce GTX 660 DC2, 240GB & 120GB SSD, 1TB HDD

PC 5: Intel Xeon W3550 @ 3.07GHz, HP (X58), 8GB DDR3, NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 (GPU: 1050MHz MEM: 1250MHz), 120GB SSD, 2TB, 1TB and 500GB HDD

PC 6: Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.8GHz, Asus P5KC, 8GB DDR2, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, 120GB SSD and 500GB HDD

HTPC: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz, HP DC7900SFF, 8GB DDR2 800MHz, Asus Radeon HD 6570, 240GB SSD and 3TB HDD

WinXP PC: Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 2.33GHz, Asus P5B, 2GB DDR2 667MHz, NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT, 32GB SSD and 80GB HDD

RetroPC: Intel Pentium 4 HT @ 3.0GHz, Gigabyte GA-8SGXLFS, 2gb DDR1, ATi Radeon 9800 Pro, 2x 40gb HDD

My first PC: Intel Celeron 333MHz, Diamond Micronics C400, 384mb RAM, Diamond Viper V550 (NVIDIA Riva TNT), 6gb and 8gb HDD

Server: 2x Intel Xeon E5420, Dell PowerEdge 2950, 32gb DDR2, ATI ES1000, 4x 146gb SAS

Dual Opteron PC: 2x 6-core AMD Opteron 2419EE, HP XW9400, 32GB DDR2, ATI Radeon 3650, 500gb HDD

Core2 Duo PC: Intel Core2 Duo E8400, HP DC7800, 4gb DDR2, NVIDIA Quadro FX1700, 1tb and 80gb HDD

Athlon XP PC: AMD Athlon XP 2400+, MSI something, 1,5gb DDR1, ATI Radeon 9200, 40gb HDD

Thinkpad: Intel Core2 Duo T7200, Lenovo Thinkpad T60, 4gb DDR2, ATI Mobility Radeon X1400, 1tb HDD

Pentium 3 PC: Intel Pentium 3 866MHz, Asus CUSL2-C, 512mb RAM, 3DFX VooDoo 3 2000 AGP

Laptop: Dell Latitude E6430, Intel Core i5-3210M, 6gb DDR3 1600MHz , Intel HD 4000, 250gb Samsung SSD 860 EVO, 1TB WD Blue HDD

Laptop: Latitude 3380, Intel Pentium Gold 4415U 2c/4t @ 2.3GHz, 8GB DDR4, Intel HD 610, 120GB SSD, 13.3" 768p TN, 56Wh battery

Phone: Huawei Honor 9 64GB + 256GB card Watch: Motorola Moto 360 1st Gen.

Laptop 2: ThinkPad T450, Intel Core i7-5600U 2c/4t @ 2.6-3.2GHz, 16GB DDR3 1600MHz, Intel HD 5500, 250GB SSD, 14" 900p TN, 24Wh + 72Wh batteries

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2018 at 1:09 PM, DarkSmith2 said:

so you are saying there is no difference hu?

pubg-cpu-core-performance.png

what about that? 4core no hyperthreading being slow? How is it possible than? You have to get your facts straight...

And no a 1080ti isnt even overkill on 1080p60.. the time will come where its even a slow card for 1080p. It will just last longer.

People said the same thing about the 780ti, nowdays its a crap card, and it isnt even a long time ago since...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade to an i7-8700k.

Personal Computer Build:

CPU: i7-4790k | Motherboard: Asus Z97-A | RAM: 16GB G. Skill | Graphics Card: Nvidia Geforce Gtx 1070 TI Founders Edition | Case: Corsair 750D | Storage: Samsung 850 Evo 250GB / Western Digital Black 1TB / Western Digital Blue 1TB | Power Supply: EVGA 750watt SuperNova Gold Rated | Displays: 3 VG248QE 24" 144hz, 1MS | CPU Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 | Keyboard: Razer Chroma BlackWidow

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, useffff said:

 

again a worthless, in memory bandwidth limited and bottlenecked video with potential false results due to a bad testing metholodogy even below natively supported CPU specs. Its a little embarrassing to watch people like Jay testing stuff that he really shouldnt test and let the pro's do.

(f.e. Toms Hardware / Gamers Nexus / Digital Foundry).

 

I know he is really enjoyable to watch with his video's but to be honest i wouldnt count his data in stuff like this as a benchmark. He has alot of hardware knowledge but lacks depth on almost every topic other then Watercooling, he is trying to improve every day and works hard to get more scientifically and professional but still makes mistakes altering an distorting the results.¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

So unfortunately i have to say i didnt even watched the whole video, finding flaws within the first two minutes of the video, no matter what results he had, im not confident in trusting them. But i like this guy and wish him the best.

CPU: Ryzen 7 5800x3D | MoBo: MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk | RAM: G.Skill F4-3600C15D-16GTZ @3800CL16 | GPU: RTX 2080Ti | PSU: Corsair HX1200 | 

Case: Lian Li 011D XL | Storage: Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe 500GB, Crucial MX500 500GB | Soundcard: Soundblaster ZXR | Mouse: Razer Viper Mini | Keyboard: Razer Huntsman TE Monitor: DELL AW2521H @360Hz |

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×