Jump to content

Server grade Vs Consumer grade Hardware

So I've watched linus tech tips for a while now and he has stated that last-gen server grade hardware is nearly as good as the newest generation of consumer hardware.

 

Questions

1) is Thye above statement true? (yes, I meant to use thye :))

 

2) Is there a good website to compare server and consumer hardware against each other?

 

           2a) Is there a good website for comparing all computer hardware?

 

Thanks You,

TheGodlyJorts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Sometimes. I don't have too much experience with server hardware.

2. userbenchmark.com and cpuboss.com

2a. ^^^ + gpuboss.com

Computer engineering grad student, cybersecurity researcher, and hobbyist embedded systems developer

 

Daily Driver:

CPU: Ryzen 7 4800H | GPU: RTX 2060 | RAM: 16GB DDR4 3200MHz C16

 

Gaming PC:

CPU: Ryzen 5 5600X | GPU: EVGA RTX 2080Ti | RAM: 32GB DDR4 3200MHz C16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, thegreengamers said:

1. Sometimes. I don't have too much experience with server hardware.

2. userbenchmark.com and cpuboss.com

Ok thanks, man, I'll check out those websites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TheGodlyJorts said:

So I've watched linus tech tips for a while now and he has stated that last-gen server grade hardware is nearly as good as the newest generation of consumer hardware.

 

Questions

1) is Thye above statement true? (yes, I meant to use thye :))

 

2) Is there a good website to compare server and consumer hardware against each other?

 

           2a) Is there a good website for comparing all computer hardware?

 

 

Yes last gen stuff is just fine.

cpubenchmark website is good for cpus and gpus

 

just buy a used 4th gen intel they are cheap! Like $200 for a 4gen i5, a bit more for 4th gen i7.

Cant beat the price compared to new or build your own.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Canada EH said:

Yes last gen stuff is just fine.

cpubenchmark website is good for cpus and gpus

 

ok, thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thegreengamers said:

1. Sometimes. I don't have too much experience with server hardware.

2. userbenchmark.com and cpuboss.com

2a. ^^^ + gpuboss.com

CPUBoss and GPUBoss is just straight up false facts, and userbenchmark doesn't care about clock speed.

 

Userbenchmark generally works for vauge comparisons though.

 

`

21 minutes ago, TheGodlyJorts said:

So I've watched linus tech tips for a while now and he has stated that last-gen server grade hardware is nearly as good as the newest generation of consumer hardware.

 

Questions

1) is Thye above statement true? (yes, I meant to use thye :))

 

2) Is there a good website to compare server and consumer hardware against each other?

 

           2a) Is there a good website for comparing all computer hardware?

 

Thanks You,

TheGodlyJorts

1. No, at least most of the time

2. Most server hardware is just rebranded consumer with server grade reliability, and the higher end chips are terrible for gaming/consumer tasks anyway

2a. Benchmark sites, but if you want a vague comparison userbenchmark will work

PSU Nerd | PC Parts Flipper | Cable Management Guru

Helpful Links: PSU Tier List | Why not group reg? | Avoid the EVGA G3

Helios EVO (Main Desktop) Intel Core™ i9-10900KF | 32GB DDR4-3000 | GIGABYTE Z590 AORUS ELITE | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NZXT H510 | EVGA G5 650W

 

Delta (Laptop) | Galaxy S21 Ultra | Pacific Spirit XT (Server)

Full Specs

Spoiler

 

Helios EVO (Main):

Intel Core™ i9-10900KF | 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws V / Team T-Force DDR4-3000 | GIGABYTE Z590 AORUS ELITE | MSI GAMING X GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB GPU | NZXT H510 | EVGA G5 650W | MasterLiquid ML240L | 2x 2TB HDD | 256GB SX6000 Pro SSD | 3x Corsair SP120 RGB | Fractal Design Venturi HF-14

 

Pacific Spirit XT - Server

Intel Core™ i7-8700K (Won at LTX, signed by Dennis) | GIGABYTE Z370 AORUS GAMING 5 | 16GB Team Vulcan DDR4-3000 | Intel UrfpsgonHD 630 | Define C TG | Corsair CX450M

 

Delta - Laptop

ASUS TUF Dash F15 - Intel Core™ i7-11370H | 16GB DDR4 | RTX 3060 | 500GB NVMe SSD | 200W Brick | 65W USB-PD Charger

 


 

Intel is bringing DDR4 to the mainstream with the Intel® Core™ i5 6600K and i7 6700K processors. Learn more by clicking the link in the description below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at this

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-4670-vs-Intel-Core-i5-7400/m630vs3886

 

So $200 buckaroons or $700+

I will save my money TYVM!

Used PC is the only way to go!

 

 

Refurbished: Dell Optiplex 9020 SFF i5-4590 3.30GHz 4GB 160GB Win 7 Pro 1 Yr Wty$194

just slap in an extra 4Gb of ram, and a HDD

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JDE said:

CPUBoss and GPUBoss is just straight up false facts, and userbenchmark doesn't care about clock speed.

They've always worked for me at giving a rough comparison, although the benchmarks, especially those for CPUs, are questionable. What do you mean about it not caring about clock speed?

Computer engineering grad student, cybersecurity researcher, and hobbyist embedded systems developer

 

Daily Driver:

CPU: Ryzen 7 4800H | GPU: RTX 2060 | RAM: 16GB DDR4 3200MHz C16

 

Gaming PC:

CPU: Ryzen 5 5600X | GPU: EVGA RTX 2080Ti | RAM: 32GB DDR4 3200MHz C16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, thegreengamers said:

They've always worked for me, although the benchmarks, especially those for CPUs, is questionable. What do you mean about it not caring about clock speed.

CPUBoss and GPUBoss doesn't base off facts

 

Userbenchmark doesn't care if you used a R7 1700 downclocked to 1GhZ w/ 2133 RAM and 1 core, or a R7 1700 overclocked to 7GhZ with LN2 and DDR4-4200.

PSU Nerd | PC Parts Flipper | Cable Management Guru

Helpful Links: PSU Tier List | Why not group reg? | Avoid the EVGA G3

Helios EVO (Main Desktop) Intel Core™ i9-10900KF | 32GB DDR4-3000 | GIGABYTE Z590 AORUS ELITE | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NZXT H510 | EVGA G5 650W

 

Delta (Laptop) | Galaxy S21 Ultra | Pacific Spirit XT (Server)

Full Specs

Spoiler

 

Helios EVO (Main):

Intel Core™ i9-10900KF | 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws V / Team T-Force DDR4-3000 | GIGABYTE Z590 AORUS ELITE | MSI GAMING X GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB GPU | NZXT H510 | EVGA G5 650W | MasterLiquid ML240L | 2x 2TB HDD | 256GB SX6000 Pro SSD | 3x Corsair SP120 RGB | Fractal Design Venturi HF-14

 

Pacific Spirit XT - Server

Intel Core™ i7-8700K (Won at LTX, signed by Dennis) | GIGABYTE Z370 AORUS GAMING 5 | 16GB Team Vulcan DDR4-3000 | Intel UrfpsgonHD 630 | Define C TG | Corsair CX450M

 

Delta - Laptop

ASUS TUF Dash F15 - Intel Core™ i7-11370H | 16GB DDR4 | RTX 3060 | 500GB NVMe SSD | 200W Brick | 65W USB-PD Charger

 


 

Intel is bringing DDR4 to the mainstream with the Intel® Core™ i5 6600K and i7 6700K processors. Learn more by clicking the link in the description below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thegreengamers said:

What do you mean about it not caring about clock speed?

It means that all the benchmark results are aggregated without further differentiation / segmentation to factor in overclockers and people who run things at stock speeds (e.g. the results from a 3.4 GHz Ryzen will be lumped into the same pool of results as a 4.0 GHz chip).

 

This wouldn't be a problem if the population of users who submitted a result are representative of the overall user population (e.g. everyone who bought that particular chip), however a large proportion of people who submit bench results are likely to be overclocking enthusiasts than not, meaning the numbers end up being skewed towards the higher end of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do want to compare? Motherboard / Processors?

Most of the times server grade is just a re-badge consumer product with added value like more lan ports / memory slots or better technical support.

Server grade hardware lean more to durability / reliability than speed and accessories.

That's why you won't see overclocking options in server motherboards.

 

Server grade mobo:

- thicker PCB

- better quality capacitors

- More lan ports

- Different chipset with ECC support

- More memory slots

- Multiple CPU sockets

 

Server grade CPU (Intel Xeon / AMD Epyc):

- ECC memory support

- More than 64 gb memory support (vs 64gb in i7/ryzen)

- Higher core / threads count

- Lower clock speed & TDP, for lower power consumption

- Higher l2 / l3 cache

- Locked fsb & multiplier / no OC

- No build-in gpu

 

Server grade memory:
- Error checking and corrections function (ECC)

- Slower speed.

 

Server grade ssd

- Use SLC / MLC chips, higher durability, longer mean time to failure

- Slower overall bandwidth

 

Quote

last-gen server grade hardware is nearly as good as the newest generation of consumer 

He may be referring to speed

Ryzen 5700g @ 4.4ghz all cores | Asrock B550M Steel Legend | 3060 | 2x 16gb Micron E 2666 @ 4200mhz cl16 | 500gb WD SN750 | 12 TB HDD | Deepcool Gammax 400 w/ 2 delta 4000rpm push pull | Antec Neo Eco Zen 500w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Server CPUs are higher binned for lower voltages and temps at a given workload/clock speed. If you can find a server CPU at the clock speed you need then it will be better than it's consumer counterpart. 

 

As an example, the 1366 Xeon CPUs OC higher and run cooler than the fist gen i7s.

Black Knight-

Ryzen 5 5600, GIGABYTE B550M DS3H, 16Gb Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000mhz, Asrock RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming,

Seasonic Focus GM 750, Samsung EVO 860 EVO SSD M.2, Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe, Linux Mint 20.2 Cinnamon

 

Daughter's Rig;

MSI B450 A Pro, Ryzen 5 3600x, 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000mhz, Silicon Power A55 512GB SSD, Gigabyte RX 5700 Gaming OC, Corsair CX430

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×