Jump to content

Intel must lower their prices or no one will by Intel cpu's

Ryzen completely destroyed intel with RYZEN THREADRIPPER

intel 7900X is 1 000 $ but with only 10 cores 

Ryzen is also 1 000$ but with 16 cores

Ryzen completely destroyed Intel

watch the video

 

 

Intel lower your prices no one will by your 1 000 $ CPU

people will buy the AMD version because it's better and faster .

 

edit 1 : imagine Intel selling monitors in future to help paying the electricity bill hahahahahahahahahahahaha

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, M.Yurizaki said:

Okay. Well, these topics are troll/flame/etc. bait and will likely be closed by a mod soon

Yeah. Plus, it's still even, since lots of people prefer to stick to intel, and they still beat Ryzen in IPC and core clock, so if your applications need those, Intel will win out. It's really a tie, unless you go for pure theoretical value, then Threadripper wins. 

Gaming PC NAS Laptop Workstation

CPU: i5 12600KF 6P+4E Ryzen 7 3700X M4 SoC 4P+6E Xeon X5690 6c12t

Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S Wraith Stealth w/NF-A9 Passive Apple CPU Cooler

Motherboard: ASRock Z690 ITX/ax ASUS Pro B550M-C/CSM Apple J713AP Mac-F221BEC8 (Mac Pro 5,1)

RAM: 2x16GB 3600Mhz DDR4 2x16GB 2400MHz DDR4 24GB Micron LPDDR5 4x8GB 1333MHz ECC DDR3

GPU: Sapphire Pulse Radeon 9060 XT 16GB Radeon WX2100 M4 SoC 10C Radeon RX 5700

Storage: 1TB MP34 + 2TB P41 500GB SSD + 2x4TB IronWolf Pro in ZFS Mirror Apple AP0512Z 1TB Crucial MX500

ODD: LG WH14NS40 None LG GP65NB60 USB DVD Writer Don't know

PSU: EVGA 850W GM Silverstone SST-TX300 53.8Wh LiPo Battery Delta DPS-980BB

Case: Silverstone Sugo 14 Dell Inspiron 530S Mac16,12 chassis (13" MBA) 2009-2012 Mac Pro "Cheese Grater"

OS: Gentoo Linux TrueNAS Scale macOS 26 Tahoe Fedora Linux

 

Display: LG 27UK650-W (4K 60Hz IPS panel)

Mouse: EVGA X17

Keyboard: Corsair K55 RGB

 

Mobile/Work Devices: 14" M5P MacBook Pro (work) - iPhone 17 Pro - Apple Watch S11

 

Other Misc Devices: iPod Video (Gen 5.5E, iFlash Solo w/128GB SD Card, Rockbox), Nintendo Switch

 

Vehicles: 2002 Ford F150, 2003 Harley-Davidson Sportster 1200, 2022 Kawasaki KLR650, 1994 DR350SE

Link to post
Share on other sites

>Enthusiast tier processor

>Struggles make it past 4GHz

 

k, bud

 

Only place AMD wins, as usual is in value. 16 cores for $1000 Can't fault that.

Our Grace. The Feathered One. He shows us the way. His bob is majestic and shows us the path. Follow unto his guidance and His example. He knows the one true path. Our Saviour. Our Grace. Our Father Birb has taught us with His humble heart and gentle wing the way of the bob. Let us show Him our reverence and follow in His example. The True Path of the Feathered One. ~ Dimboble-dubabob III

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Zando Bob said:

Yeah. Plus, it's still even, since lots of people prefer to stick to intel, and they still beat Ryzen in IPC and core clock, so if your applications need those, Intel will win out. It's really a tie, unless you go for pure theoretical value, then Threadripper wins. 

Only the 1950X ;) The 1920X and the 1900X are bad value compared to X299

CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K | Motherboard: AsRock X99 Extreme4 | Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1080 G1 Gaming | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws4 2133MHz | Storage: 1 x Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 1 x WD Green 2TB | 1 x WD Blue 500GB | PSU: Corsair RM750x | Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro (White) | Cooling: Arctic Freezer i32

 

Mice: Logitech G Pro X Superlight (main), Logitech G Pro Wireless, Razer Viper Ultimate, Zowie S1 Divina Blue, Zowie FK1-B Divina Blue, Logitech G Pro (3366 sensor), Glorious Model O, Razer Viper Mini, Logitech G305, Logitech G502, Logitech G402

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also $1000 is too much for even most enthusiasts to simply drop on for a CPU, so most of us are likely not going to care anyway.

 

And it's been beaten to death that Ryzen 5/7 (the price point most of us do care about) are a better value overall.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But the general public doesnt care. This happened to the GPU market in the past already.

 

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

The 1920X and the 1900X are bad value compared to X299

 

 

This meant to be a fire starter?

 

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, M.Yurizaki said:

Also $1000 is too much for even most enthusiasts to simply drop on for a CPU

I'd like to summon @done12many2 and @Masada02 

 

These guys don't play about. 

Our Grace. The Feathered One. He shows us the way. His bob is majestic and shows us the path. Follow unto his guidance and His example. He knows the one true path. Our Saviour. Our Grace. Our Father Birb has taught us with His humble heart and gentle wing the way of the bob. Let us show Him our reverence and follow in His example. The True Path of the Feathered One. ~ Dimboble-dubabob III

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DildorTheDecent said:

I'd like to summon @done12many2 and @Masada02 

 

These guys don't play about. 

The keywords are  "most of us." They would be considered the exception, not the rule.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Jurrunio said:

This meant to be a fire starter?

Think about it. The 1920X costs $800 and the 7800X costs $380, so the 1920X is worse value than the 7800X (especially if you take into account the fact that the 7800X can be overclocked to 4.8GHz). The 1900X is not really worth it because for $50 more you can get the 7820X which offers way more performance. IMO, the 1950X is the best HEDT CPU in terms of price/performance. ;)

CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K | Motherboard: AsRock X99 Extreme4 | Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1080 G1 Gaming | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws4 2133MHz | Storage: 1 x Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 1 x WD Green 2TB | 1 x WD Blue 500GB | PSU: Corsair RM750x | Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro (White) | Cooling: Arctic Freezer i32

 

Mice: Logitech G Pro X Superlight (main), Logitech G Pro Wireless, Razer Viper Ultimate, Zowie S1 Divina Blue, Zowie FK1-B Divina Blue, Logitech G Pro (3366 sensor), Glorious Model O, Razer Viper Mini, Logitech G305, Logitech G502, Logitech G402

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, PCGuy_5960 said:

Think about it. The 1920X costs $800 and the 7800X costs $380, so the 1920X is worse value than the 7800X (especially if you take into account the fact that the 7800X can be overclocked to 4.8GHz). The 1900X is not really worth it because for $50 more you can get the 7820X which offers way more performance. IMO, the 1950X is the best HEDT CPU in terms of price/performance. ;)

AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER completely destroyed intel highest processor .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, DildorTheDecent said:

I'd like to summon @done12many2 and @Masada02 

 

These guys don't play about. 

What about me owning 4 5960X's?

 

$1k for 16 cores is a damn good price. I'd buy it. I'd also buy a 7900X at $1k for that single thread and multi-thread performance.

 

I also bet the TR parts will drop in price by $100ish after a few months. They did the same thing with the 1800X, which is $430 retail now and can be had for $350 at Microcenter.

LTT Unigine SUPERPOSITION scoreboardhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

Intel i7 8700k || ASUS Z370-I ITX || AMD Radeon VII || 16GB 4266mhz DDR4 || Silverstone 800W SFX-L || 512GB 950 PRO M.2 + 3.5TB of storage SSD's

SCHIIT Lyr 3 Multibit || HiFiMAN HE-1000 V2 || MrSpeakers Ether C

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Masada02 said:

I also bet the TR parts will drop in price by $100ish after a few months. They did the same thing with the 1800X, which is $430 retail now and can be had for $350 at Microcenter.

It's still going for that in retail. Microcenter is always doing things like this (and likely doing it with a bundle and you have to buy it in person)

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Think about it. The 1920X costs $800 and the 7800X costs $380, so the 1920X is worse value than the 7800X (especially if you take into account the fact that the 7800X can be overclocked to 4.8GHz). The 1900X is not really worth it because for $50 more you can get the 7820X which offers way more performance. IMO, the 1950X is the best HEDT CPU in terms of price/performance. ;)

1920X has 12 cores while 7800X only has 6. Not even the same league... The AMD 6 core is the Ryzen 5 1600 selling at just below $200.

 

Last I checked on PCPP the 7820X sells at $678 while 1900x has an MSRP of $600.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1950X is much better than the 7900X if you can use all of those threads, but the 7900X is better if you also need good single core performance. Of course, the 1950X is much better in terms of price performance, but IMO, the 1920X and the 1900X aren't as impressive as their bigger brother ;)

Edited by wkdpaul
Cleaned up

CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K | Motherboard: AsRock X99 Extreme4 | Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1080 G1 Gaming | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws4 2133MHz | Storage: 1 x Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 1 x WD Green 2TB | 1 x WD Blue 500GB | PSU: Corsair RM750x | Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro (White) | Cooling: Arctic Freezer i32

 

Mice: Logitech G Pro X Superlight (main), Logitech G Pro Wireless, Razer Viper Ultimate, Zowie S1 Divina Blue, Zowie FK1-B Divina Blue, Logitech G Pro (3366 sensor), Glorious Model O, Razer Viper Mini, Logitech G305, Logitech G502, Logitech G402

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, DildorTheDecent said:

>Enthusiast tier processor

>Struggles make it past 4GHz

 

k, bud

 

Only place AMD wins, as usual is in value. 16 cores for $1000 Can't fault that.

>mentions enthusiast level

>talks about clock speed alone

>doesnt mention pcie lanes

 

k, bud

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, M.Yurizaki said:

Also $1000 is too much for even most enthusiasts to simply drop on for a CPU, so most of us are likely not going to care anyway.

 

And it's been beaten to death that Ryzen 5/7 (the price point most of us do care about) are a better value overall.

21 minutes ago, DildorTheDecent said:

I'd like to summon @done12many2 and @Masada02 

 

These guys don't play about. 

19 minutes ago, M.Yurizaki said:

The keywords are  "most of us." They would be considered the exception, not the rule.

 

The problem is "enthusiast" is used differently today then it was a few years ago.  A few years ago, an "enthusiast" was generally viewed as the nut jobs who spent $1k or more on CPUs while combining them with multiple high dollar GPUs, blah, blah, blah.

 

Today, anyone who like computers a lot refers to themselves as enthusiasts.  

 

If you would have said "$1000 is too much for even most enthusiasts" a few years ago, everyone would have told you that you're crazy because it wasn't unusual at all.  Say it today with how the term "enthusiast" is currently viewed and you're right.  

 

There are plenty of us that buy the top CPUs that are often over $1k.  You'll see more of them on OCN than LTT.  LTT is a much much younger crowd and that has an impact on what you see as the norm as well as opinions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

but the 7900X is better if you also need good single core performance

you said if you need single core performance ? hahahahahaha

 

for 1 000 $ I will buy the Ryzen CPU  .

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jurrunio said:

1920X has 12 cores while 7800X only has 6. Not even the same league... 

Please read my reply:

14 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Think about it. The 1920X costs $800 and the 7800X costs $380, so the 1920X is worse value than the 7800X (especially if you take into account the fact that the 7800X can be overclocked to 4.8GHz). The 1900X is not really worth it because for $50 more you can get the 7820X which offers way more performance. IMO, the 1950X is the best HEDT CPU in terms of price/performance. ;)

3 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

Last I checked on PCPP the 7820X sells at $678 while 1900x has an MSRP of $600.

Check again:

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117794

The 1900X has an MSRP of $550

CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K | Motherboard: AsRock X99 Extreme4 | Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1080 G1 Gaming | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws4 2133MHz | Storage: 1 x Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 1 x WD Green 2TB | 1 x WD Blue 500GB | PSU: Corsair RM750x | Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro (White) | Cooling: Arctic Freezer i32

 

Mice: Logitech G Pro X Superlight (main), Logitech G Pro Wireless, Razer Viper Ultimate, Zowie S1 Divina Blue, Zowie FK1-B Divina Blue, Logitech G Pro (3366 sensor), Glorious Model O, Razer Viper Mini, Logitech G305, Logitech G502, Logitech G402

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, done12many2 said:

The problem is "enthusiast" is used definitely today then it was a few years ago.  A few years ago, an "enthusiast" was generally viewed as the nut jobs who spend $1k or more on CPUs while combining them with multiple higher dollar GPUs, blah, blah, blah.

 

Today, anyone who like computers a lot refers to themselves as enthusiasts.  

 

If you would have said "$1000 is too much for even most enthusiasts" a few years ago, everyone would have told you that you're crazy because it wasn't unusual at all.  Say it today with how the term "enthusiast" is currently viewed and you're right.  

 

There are plenty of us that buy the top CPUs that are often over $1k.  You'll see more of them on OCN than LTT.  LTT is a much much younger crowd and that has an impact on what you see as the norm as well as opinions.

I don't think it's fair to say how much money you dump into the product of your hobby is indicative of your level of interest in said hobby. For example, car people. Do you need to buy a Lamborghini or a Ferrari to be considered a car enthusiast? No. You can be wrenching on your 20 year old classic that probably didn't cost you a lot and be considered an enthusiast.

 

I define it as the level of interest and effort you put into learning about said hobby. Which is why I have my sentiments on why most PC gamers aren't really PC enthusiasts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, M.Yurizaki said:

I don't think it's fair to say how much money you dump into the product of your hobby is indicative of your level of interest in said hobby. For example, car people. Do you need to buy a Lamborghini or a Ferrari to be considered a car enthusiast? No. You can be wrenching on your 20 year old classic that probably didn't cost you a lot and be considered an enthusiast.

 

I define it as the level of interest and effort you put into learning about said hobby. Which is why I have my sentiments on why most PC gamers aren't really PC enthusiasts.

 

I agree.  I'm just telling you the difference between then and now.  I'm not justifying it.  It's just how it is/was.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

locked.

 

as per the community standards;

Quote

No harassment, discrimination or abuse of any kind.

  • This includes insults, fanboy, or troll accusations
Quote

No Trolling

  • This includes flame wars such as NVIDIA vs AMD, political or religious debate.

 

If you need help with your forum account, please use the Forum Support form !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×