to destroy

[bcguru9384]

to destroy is easy and takes no intelligence.

to build takes brains and help.

should we master destruction or creation?

 

what do you think?

[yathis]

creation

 

I think you got a stupid question, but I am bored.

[dalekphalm]

12 hours ago, bcguru9384 said:

to destroy is easy and takes no intelligence.

to build takes brains and help.

should we master destruction or creation?

 

what do you think?

Destroying some things is easy - but for other things, takes a significant amount of creativity and intelligence.

 

You're generalizing, no doubt to create some pseudo-philosophical discussion.

 

Creation and destruction go hand in hand. We cannot do one without the other. Both are necessary and (in the right circumstances) good. Any other thinking is black and white and unhelpful to reality.

[MadyTehWolfie]

Can't have alpha without Omega. Can't have a beginning without a end. Can't have creation without destruction. 

[Tech_Dreamer]

generalizing is easy when you cant process things thoroughly, Just saying as an example , the nuclear bomb wasn't created by a bunch of stupid people when we're talking about destruction , destruction can also be organized & planned out & executed thoroughly & call it for the better of tomorrow.

[maybethisnamewillwork]

Every act of creation is first an act of destruction.

[Coaxialgamer]

But... I like to blow stuff up

[Dash Lambda]

18 hours ago, bcguru9384 said:

To destroy is easy and takes no intelligence.

 

18 hours ago, bcguru9384 said:

To build takes brains and help.

[Maxitom]

“The more clearly we can focus our attention on the wonders and realities of the universe about us, the less taste we shall have for destruction.” 
― Rachel Carson

[bcguru9384]

7 hours ago, dalekphalm said:

Destroying some things is easy - but for other things, takes a significant amount of creativity and intelligence.

 

You're generalizing, no doubt to create some pseudo-philosophical discussion.

 

Creation and destruction go hand in hand. We cannot do one without the other. Both are necessary and (in the right circumstances) good. Any other thinking is black and white and unhelpful to reality.

?? 

[MrDynamicMan]

13 hours ago, Tech_Dreamer said:

generalizing is easy when you cant process things thoroughly, Just saying as an example , the nuclear bomb wasn't created by a bunch of stupid people when we're talking about destruction , destruction can also be organized & planned out & executed thoroughly & call it for the better of tomorrow.

And making a nuclear bomb is some intense levels of "creation" 

[mr moose]

I find the entropy of existence to be both chaotic and self defining in a very oxymoron way.  One might say a lack of intrinsic order in existence is chaotic, but one might also fairly assume that a complete lack of order would be more uniform.   

 

To  deconstruct an object is to equalize the existence for each of the parts,  they then no longer have an individual role to play, but all share the same meaningless existence as debris of no specific purpose. .