Ryzen OC Results

[NerdModeEngaged]

Hi, I just thought it would be cool to create a thread of people listing their Ryzen overclocking results, submissions should list hardware compenents and overclocking results preferebly with CPU-Z validation as proof, my results are as follows:  

CPU: AMD RYZEN 5 1600X 

Clock Speed: 4.1Ghz 

Voltage: 1.4V 

Cooler: BeQuiet! Pure Rock 

OC Load Temp: 63°C 

Motherboard: ASUS Prime X370-PRO 

Validation: http://valid.x86.fr/gp30w7

 

Please note: I haven't tried pushing pass 4.1 yet as I have only had the system for one day, however there may still be more headroom as it only took 0.025V to go from 4Ghz to  4.1 however I do not want to exceed 1.4V for 24/7 Usage (I am also having extreme difficulty with RAM with one of my DIMMs being DOA) 

[WereCat]

I don't have Ryzen chip.

 

But you got some very nice OC from that 1600X, most of them barely achieve 4.0GHz at well above 1.4V.

[NerdModeEngaged]

Just now, WereCat said:

I don't have Ryzen chip.

 

But you got some very nice OC from that 1600X, most of them barely achieve 4.0GHz at well above 1.4V.

Thanks man, I do seem to have good luck with the silicon lottery as my RX 480 is stable at 1490 with +100mv so am happy to see that my luck has carried on 

[WereCat]

Just now, NerdModeEngaged said:

Thanks man, I do seem to have good luck with the silicon lottery as my RX 480 is stable at 1490 with +100mv so am happy to see that my luck has carried on 

 

What is your CPU-Z Benchmark Single-core and Multi-core score? I would like to get a rough comparison to my 4.6GHz 4770k.

 

 

[NerdModeEngaged]

1 minute ago, WereCat said:

What is your CPU-Z Benchmark Single-core and Multi-core score? I would like to get a rough comparison to my 4.6GHz 4770k.

 

 

Its a tad mental as single core outperforms a stock 7700k and multi outperforms a stock 6950x

[WereCat]

1 minute ago, NerdModeEngaged said:

Its a tad mental as single core outperforms a stock 7700k and multi outperforms a stock 6950x

 

Very nice. I did not expect the single-core to score that high, I expected around 2100-2150 and for multi-core I knew it will be sky high

[NerdModeEngaged]

Just now, WereCat said:

Very nice. I did not expect the single-core to score that high, I expected around 2100-2150 and for multi-core I knew it will be sky high

Neither did I!, it has been a very nice performance uplift from my BLK overclocked 4570 @3.7Ghz, this is obsene performance from a £250 chip not to mention the £25 cooler is definently silently pulling its weight, I am very happy with this as I do tend to run game servers while running a game (mostly modded minecraft) while running the game and talking over discord, this resulted in my cores being maxed out at 100% on my old chip, however 8 threads sit at around 40-60% usage now with the remaining 4 doing nothing and occationly taking on some load to around 10-25%, this also means the game runs smoother, and discord/game server no longer lags out from time to time

[DocSwag]

29 minutes ago, WereCat said:

Very nice. I did not expect the single-core to score that high, I expected around 2100-2150 and for multi-core I knew it will be sky high

Might just be because Ryzen performs superbly well in CPU-z. If you did something else like cinebench the 4770k would probably win in single core.

[NerdModeEngaged]

1 minute ago, DocSwag said:

Might just be because Ryzen performs superbly well in CPU-z. If you did something else like cinebench the 4770k would probably win in single core.

This is pretty likely as i would expect the i7 getting over 200 in single as i would expect around 180

[WereCat]

3 minutes ago, DocSwag said:

Might just be because Ryzen performs superbly well in CPU-z. If you did something else like cinebench the 4770k would probably win in single core.

 

Ok, we may compare Single-core in Cinebench if OP agrees.

[DocSwag]

Just now, WereCat said:

Ok, we may compare Single-core in Cinebench if OP agrees.

Yeah that's definitely gonna win  an 1800x stock is about 161 or so which is while it's boosting at 4 or 4.1 ghz. Pretty certain your CPU will win.

[NerdModeEngaged]

alright one sec

[NerdModeEngaged]

15 minutes ago, WereCat said:

Ok, we may compare Single-core in Cinebench if OP agrees.

i got 165 Single 1323 Multi

[WereCat]

1 minute ago, NerdModeEngaged said:

i got 165 Single 1323 Multi

Not bad, stock 4790k is 165 in a single-core at 4.4GHz boost clock.

I got 932 in multi.

[NerdModeEngaged]

I am really happy I made the jump as it allows for much more headroom going forwards with more modern games taking advantage of multi cores, but not only this, the single core performance is also very good, intel needs to make some moves quick as i5s and i7s cannot keep going on being 4 cores while trying to compete with AMD, i said to myself im not going to upgrade my CPU when i got my haswell i5, until i could get a 6 core, this has finally happens as i now believe quad cores are not powerful enough for modern computing, just look at CPU utilisation in games on your cpu, it is really concerning that they have such little headroom moving forwards, however now their is competition in the market again, the stagnation has stopped hopefully meaning we will see innovation from both blue and red teams moving forwards, I do not see myself as part of the Blue, Red, or Green teams, i just want innovation and value for money. 

[matrix07012]

Ryzen is definitely a great upgrade for many people.

 

[done12many2]

42 minutes ago, NerdModeEngaged said:

I am really happy I made the jump as it allows for much more headroom going forwards with more modern games taking advantage of multi cores, but not only this, the single core performance is also very good, intel needs to make some moves quick as i5s and i7s cannot keep going on being 4 cores while trying to compete with AMD, i said to myself im not going to upgrade my CPU when i got my haswell i5, until i could get a 6 core, this has finally happens as i now believe quad cores are not powerful enough for modern computing, just look at CPU utilisation in games on your cpu, it is really concerning that they have such little headroom moving forwards, however now their is competition in the market again, the stagnation has stopped hopefully meaning we will see innovation from both blue and red teams moving forwards, I do not see myself as part of the Blue, Red, or Green teams, i just want innovation and value for money. 

 

One thing that can't be denied is the Ryzen is a great value.  

 

However, we are very far from quad core CPUs not being powerful enough for modern computing.  The fact of the matters remains that software and game developers haven't been in any hurry at all.

 

A couple of years ago, I built a 5960x / x99 rig that overclocked scores a 1968cb multi and 196cb single in Cinebench R15 and my latest 7700k / z270 rig is still MUCH better for gaming and daily use purposes.  When I built the 5960x rig, my thoughts were just like what you are thinking now.  Truth is, we aren't there yet and won't be there for a long time.  Until then, for 90% of the stuff we use throughout a day, single-core performance will still matter more.