Intel retiring their Core family of processors in 2019.

[Dabombinable]

Link this as the source, since it is the original: http://www.bitsandchips.it/english/52-english-news/7854-rumor-even-intel-is-studying-a-new-x86-uarch

1 minute ago, A Damn Crab! said:

Deathclaw was defeated using a highly modded rocket launcher, insta kill with 8 rockets at once.

Or you could just use the vanilla Big Boy MIRV......

[ARikozuM]

2 minutes ago, A Damn Crab! said:

Deathclaw was defeated using a highly modded rocket launcher, insta kill with 8 rockets at once.

I don't think you got the reference.

[A Damn Crab!]

Just now, ARikozuM said:

I don't think you got the reference.

When a double deception goes on.

 

http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/vampirediaries/images/b/b2/Mr.T-LOL.gif/revision/latest?cb=20140423215906

[SCHISCHKA]

the real story is intel is pulling out of the CPU market and will instead be manufacturing jetpacks

[Prysin]

4 hours ago, patrickjp93 said:

Yup. Tiger Lake is the last scheduled 10nm.

Aka no large improvements until 2020 

[A Damn Crab!]

1 minute ago, Prysin said:

Aka no large improvements until 2020 

AKA AMD has won.

[A Damn Crab!]

Intel have failed to deliver anything significant in a long time, AMD has pushed a huge leap in performance with a new design, this design can go a lot further than intel's Core CPU's can at this point, 2020 is a long way off. 

[Prysin]

1 minute ago, A Damn Crab! said:

AKA AMD has won.

Not really. Amd still only have a 20 odd% market share. They still have yet to defeat intel's marketing department. Which has smacked amd every time they got close to 30% market share 

[A Damn Crab!]

Just now, Prysin said:

Not really. Amd still only have a 20 odd% market share. They still have yet to defeat intel's marketing department. Which has smacked amd every time they got close to 30% market share 

3 years is a life time in the computer world.

[patrickjp93]

15 minutes ago, A Damn Crab! said:

AMD has won.

How?

 

5 minutes ago, Prysin said:

Aka no large improvements until 2020 

Define large. Ice Lake is a projected 15% improvement over Cannonlake right now.

 

2 minutes ago, A Damn Crab! said:

Intel have failed to deliver anything significant in a long time, AMD has pushed a huge leap in performance with a new design, this design can go a lot further than intel's Core CPU's can at this point, 2020 is a long way off. 

Not true. Intel just delivered perfection very early with SISD instructions taking 1 cycle a piece. What hasn't happened is software evolving for SIMD and MIMD despite the fact Intel started making those instructions back in 2005.

 

http://www.agner.org/optimize/instruction_tables.pdf

[A Damn Crab!]

Intel? perfection?

How does one gauge perfection? since no one is a diamond.

[patrickjp93]

4 minutes ago, A Damn Crab! said:

Intel? perfection?

How does one gauge perfection? since no one is a diamond.

http://www.agner.org/optimize/instruction_tables.pdf

 

You can't make instructions execute any faster than 1 cycle (register-register level), period. Once you hit that wall, it all comes down to getting data to the cores (registers particularly) faster. That's the primary driver of Intel's performance improvement since Sandy Bridge for games and other non-HPC programs. However, as I've demonstrated on my blog, there's up to a 10x performance improvement per core to be had if programs are vectorized and optimized properly. I took code directly out of UE4 and vectorized it using AVX. I got a 10x improvement on my MacBook Pro. The code and the compiler flags are available for you too if you want to try to refute the results.

 

The problem has never been Intel. It's always been software.

[ARikozuM]

3 minutes ago, A Damn Crab! said:

Intel? perfection?

How does one gauge perfection? since no one is a diamond.

Diamonds aren't perfect either. Plato would like to talk to you about the perfect forms.

[Dabombinable]

9 minutes ago, Prysin said:

Not really. Amd still only have a 20 odd% market share. They still have yet to defeat intel's marketing department. Which has smacked amd every time they got close to 30% market share 

There was that one time Intel badly fucked up and went below a 50% market share....

[A Damn Crab!]

Then stop mentioning perfection you dunces... 

 

Intel have perfected.. perfect does not exist lol.

[Dabombinable]

1 minute ago, A Damn Crab! said:

Then stop mentioning perfection you dunces... 

 

Intel have perfected.. perfect does not exist lol.

And perfection will always be a dream at the edge of the hole AMD have dug.....

[A Damn Crab!]

1 minute ago, Dabombinable said:

And perfection will always be a dream at the edge of the hole AMD have dug.....

Same was said for intel with Athlon.

 

This 3 year gap for intel and their tiny increases will be a thorn in their side if AMD releases ZEN+

[patrickjp93]

Just now, Dabombinable said:

There was that one time Intel badly fucked up and went below a 50% market share....

Yes, the x86_64 vs. Itanium battle. Well, since we're never moving to 128-bit OSes (you need 18.4 exabytes of RAM to exceed the 2^64 address limit, and we can use virtual address extensions anyway on supercomputers), I think it's safe to say such a misstep is likely to never happen again.

[patrickjp93]

Just now, A Damn Crab! said:

Same was said for intel with Athlon.

 

This 3 year gap for intel and their tiny increases will be a thorn in their side if AMD releases ZEN+

Even with a 10% IPC increase (HAH!), that would still just tie AMD with Skylake, and Intel has a large frequency advantage as well as AVX512 which will keep the server world eating out of its hands for the duration since AMD Zen can't support it.

[A Damn Crab!]

Just now, patrickjp93 said:

Even with a 10% IPC increase (HAH!), that would still just tie AMD with Skylake, and Intel has a large frequency advantage as well as AVX512 which will keep the server world eating out of its hands for the duration since AMD Zen can't support it.

Hmm yeah 7700k is 0.5% increase from Skidlake.

 

Mad bro?

[Dabombinable]

2 minutes ago, patrickjp93 said:

Yes, the x86_64 vs. Itanium battle. Well, since we're never moving to 128-bit OSes (you need 18.4 exabytes of RAM to exceed the 2^64 address limit, and we can use virtual address extensions anyway on supercomputers), I think it's safe to say such a misstep is likely to never happen again.

Its mainly to point out that in all of these years of AMD and Intel being in business, Intel has only had a lower than 50% market share once.

[patrickjp93]

Just now, A Damn Crab! said:

Hmm yeah 7700k is 0.5% increase from Skidlake.

 

Mad bro?

And Cannon and Coffee Lake show 5-8%.

[Dabombinable]

Just now, patrickjp93 said:

And Cannon and Coffee Lake ** show 5-8%.

*are projected to*

[A Damn Crab!]

Just now, patrickjp93 said:

And Cannon and Coffee Lake show 5-8%.

Numbers from your brown eye again like the perfection thing?

[patrickjp93]

1 minute ago, A Damn Crab! said:

Hmm yeah 7700k is 0.5% increase from Skidlake.

 

Mad bro?

And the 8890V5 is a 100% IPC increase over the 8890V4 because of AVX 512. Now, u mad, bro?