Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

[Bagmup]

This is pretty much the best i can get with zero artifacts, doesn't seem to make any difference at either +50Mv or +100Mv, so i left it at +50Mv for peace of mind.

 

Cant get near that reference 290 but it is good enough for second place. 

 

 

 

[impledob]

every thing stock

valley 2014-07-30 15-27-26-32.bmp

[Bagmup]

every thing stock

 

Go again on extreme pre set

[Jumper118]

every thing stock

you will need to use either the extreme HD preset or the basic to have your score put on the doc 

[ricchi]

i experienced a massive score drop with the latest driver. anyone else?

[ivhyn]

Didn't post here for months.

 

But here I am, back with the first Ultra HD benchmark in this thread (beware, I don't have a UHD monitor so I had to downsample and Valley doesn't yet support 3840x2160 which means you have to use a custom res and manually set Extreme presets).

Nontheless, here is my great score...

 

i7 2700k @ 4.4Ghz

Msi GTX 670 @ 1215 MHz Core, 1704 MHz Mem

Points: 147

Avg. FPS: 3.5

 

The Vram bottleneck was strong in this one.

 

[Briggsy]

This one is really for the lols.

 

Asus Vivobook S300CA-DS91T-CA Ultrabook (company laptop)

Intel Pentium 987

Intel HD "graphics"

Score: 119

avg fps: 2.8

 

 

 

[JDS]

Didn't post here for months.

 

But here I am, back with the first Ultra HD benchmark in this thread (beware, I don't have a UHD monitor so I had to downsample and Valley doesn't yet support 3840x2160 which means you have to use a custom res and manually set Extreme presets).

Nontheless, here is my great score...

 

i7 2700k @ 4.4Ghz

Msi GTX 670 @ 1215 MHz Core, 1704 MHz Mem

Points: 147

Avg. FPS: 3.5

 

The Vram bottleneck was strong in this one.

 

 

That makes me sad, because a 670 is pretty powerful card barring it's VRAM.

[JDS]

Side note: Anyone here run Heaven 4.0? 

[ricchi]

Finally had some time to play around with the card, managed to go up to 1.3ghz boosted but it wasnt 24/7 stable, so i had to drop it down a bit. 

bench was done using 1160mhz core, 1225mhz core boost and 1277mhz actual clock speeds with 1.190v. Going at 1.2 or higher didnt really help and temps are quite high as it is. Memory was at 7800mhz with 1.64v, im pretty sure it can do 8000 but at this point, its not making too much difference. i might give it a go later

 

 

[Georgew221]

CPU - i5-4670

GPU - GTX 670

Average FPS - 43.9

Score - 1839

Setting - Extreme HD
 

[Jumper118]

updated

[Najuno]

UPDATE

 

So after playing around a bit this is the max I can get without artifacting. Too bad I can´t push it any further but the 1 card doesn´t like it and I want to run my cards linked, but I guess the score is alright .

 

[Jumper118]

UPDATE

 

So after playing around a bit this is the max I can get without artifacting. Too bad I can´t push it any further but the 1 card doesn´t like it and I want to run my cards linked, but I guess the score is alright .

 

 

that is a nice score. its put you in the top 10

[Karikiro]

i experienced a massive score drop with the latest driver. anyone else?

I have issues with data-throughput-dependent frame-reduction when overclocking. After 3 to 4 minutes of load (Unigine Valley) the framerate drops down to roughly half. GPU-statistics don't change, except for the total power-consumption and GPU-temperature. CPU-overclocking makes it worse.

I haven't tested my graphics-card behaviour at stock, but will do it this weekend.

Edit: Lowering the memory-clock fixed my problem. At stock it doesn't occur and CPU-clocks only affect it, when the issue is present.

 

@Jumper118: Yeh, 4670k.

[Jumper118]

I have issues with data-throughput-dependent frame-reduction when overclocking. After 3 to 4 minutes of load (Unigine Valley) the framerate drops down to roughly half. GPU-statistics don't change, except for the total power-consumption and GPU-temperature. CPU-overclocking makes it worse.

I haven't tested my graphics-card behaviour at stock, but will do it this weekend.

Edit: Lowering the memory-clock fixed my problem. At stock it doesn't occur and CPU-clocks only affect it, when the issue is present.

 

@Jumper118: Yeh, 4670k.

ok thanks for letting me know.

[cnapier39428]

Third r9-290 and WC-Loop for more ocing to come

That's three 290s? Lol wtf. My single 290 got 2600 and my two 780tis in sli get 57xx points lol

[cnapier39428]

patrickbdavis

Intel 4670k

Nvidia 780 @ 1346/1928

80.4 PFS

3363 Score

That is a balling ass score for a 780, it's almost as much as my 780ti

[Kukielka]

That's three 290s? Lol wtf. My single 290 got 2600 and my two 780tis in sli get 57xx points lol

Unigine scales horrible with amd cards, 3Dmark is a way better to compare performance in that manner

 

Also, this pic is done using 2x r9-290 on air, as said:

 

Third r9-290 and WC-Loop for more ocing to come  

[DirtySouthWookie]

3 GTX770s SLI

I74770k@4.3Ghz

[Jumper118]

3 GTX770s SLI

I74770k@4.3Ghz

what is the core and memory speeds on the 770's

[DirtySouthWookie]

core 1334

mem 4075

Wow fast update!

Happy 1000th post thread!

[Jumper118]

core 1334

mem 4075

Wow fast update!

Happy 1000th post thread!

is that in gpuz or valley, because valley is wrong on nvidia cards with gpu boost? 

[DirtySouthWookie]

Sorry you are right!

 

per GPUZ:

 

1178/2038

 

 

 

[Jumper118]

Sorry you are right!

 

per GPUZ:

 

1178/2038

thanks.