Jump to content

Did i fell dfiference in games between SSD EVO 850 and Crucial Bx 100 ?

zzz123

Hi. Is any sense to buy and pay more for SSD SAMSUNG Evo 850 250 GB than SSD CRUCIAL BX 100? Is any performance difference in games? I am only gaming.

 

Crucial BX100  READ 535 MB/S         WRITE 370MB/S

 

http://www.arest.pl/produkt/,,,ssd%20crucial%20bx100,,,,Magazyn:0,/47977/SSD-CRUCIAL-BX100-250-GB-2-5-SATA3-535-MB-s-370-MB-s-CT250BX100SSD1/

 

http://www.arest.pl/produkt/,,,evo%20850,,,,Magazyn:0,/47757/SSD-SAMSUNG-850-EVO-250-GB-2-5-SATA3-540-MB-s-520-MB-s-MZ-75E250B-EU/

 

Samsung Evo 850 250 GB : READ 540 MB/S        WRITE 520 MB/S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In games? No. Loading games? There's a bit of a difference, but really nothing significant. 

Both are good, go for the BX100 if you want to save the money, you won't really be missing out on anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well guessing from the specs Samsung will be little faster, but i cant really tell you in seconds. If max of  +/- 5/10sec dont border then its fine...... 

 

But at all i think its worth to pay little extra for Samsung, call me Fanboy but i trust them more than Crucial.

 

Project Redline: 

♦CPU: i7-5820k  ♦CPU Cooler: Kraken x61 ♦Mobo: MSI X99A SLI ♦RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB 3200mhz ♦GPU: Evga 980Ti Hybrid ♦Case: NZXT H440 ♦SSD: Samsung 850EVO 500GB ♦HDD: WD BLUE 1TB 7200rpm ♦Display: 1280 x 1024

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently switched form a Mushkin SSD to a Samsung 850 Evo and didn't notice any significant differences in performance. Also SSD's are mostly helpful for loading times in games but have rarely any impact on frame rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so in fps in games will be not difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, zzz123 said:

Ok so in fps in games will be not difference?

SSD doesnt impact FPS just the loading and boot times. 

Project Redline: 

♦CPU: i7-5820k  ♦CPU Cooler: Kraken x61 ♦Mobo: MSI X99A SLI ♦RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB 3200mhz ♦GPU: Evga 980Ti Hybrid ♦Case: NZXT H440 ♦SSD: Samsung 850EVO 500GB ♦HDD: WD BLUE 1TB 7200rpm ♦Display: 1280 x 1024

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went a cheaper route and bought a SanDisk and I'm not complaining.

[CPU: 4.7ghz I5 6600k] [MBAsus Z170 Pro G] [RAM: G.Skill 2400 16GB(2x8)]

[GPU: MSI Twin Frozr GTX 970] [PSU: XFX Pro 850W] [Cooler: Hyper 212 Evo]
[Storage: 500GB WD HDD / 128GB SanDisk SSD ] [Case: DeepCool Tessaract]

[Keyboard: AZIO MGK1] [Mouse: Logitech G303] [Monitor: 2 x Acer 23" 1080p IPS]

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, zzz123 said:

Ok so in fps in games will be not difference?

No difference at all. They primarily effect loading times, with some games having texture pop-in with slower drives, depending on how the game manages loading textures. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, zzz123 said:

SNIP

SSDs do not effect game performance, only loading times

 

both SSDs have the same read speeds so you will not notice any difference 

Desktop - Corsair 300r i7 4770k H100i MSI 780ti 16GB Vengeance Pro 2400mhz Crucial MX100 512gb Samsung Evo 250gb 2 TB WD Green, AOC Q2770PQU 1440p 27" monitor Laptop Clevo W110er - 11.6" 768p, i5 3230m, 650m GT 2gb, OCZ vertex 4 256gb,  4gb ram, Server: Fractal Define Mini, MSI Z78-G43, Intel G3220, 8GB Corsair Vengeance, 4x 3tb WD Reds in Raid 10, Phone Oppo Reno 10x 256gb , Camera Sony A7iii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In term of FPS no. But loading speeds are much faster. 

 

Something that a heavily modded skyrim will find useful. 

i5 2400 | ASUS RTX 4090 TUF OC | Seasonic 1200W Prime Gold | WD Green 120gb | WD Blue 1tb | some ram | a random case

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a lot of things that factor into how quickly a game loads, and it's usually down to optimization on the part of the developer. Some games are very sensitive to storage performance, and for others not as much. While some games load much faster from an SSD, it's not true across the board that all games load noticeably faster. Basically I wouldn't suggest an SSD solely for it's purported effects on gaming—there's a much more dramatic difference in desktop application use and Windows operations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×