LGA 1151 cpu equivalent to i5-4460?

[Mkander99]

I believe it is the i5-6500 but I may be wrong

 

SIDE NOTE: how does my build look and anything that could lower the price without sacrificing performance? http://pcpartpicker.com/p/mRwszy

[WebPlayz]

Just now, Mkander99 said:

I believe it is the i5-6500 but I may be wrong

 

SIDE NOTE: how does my build look and anything that could lower the price without sacrificing performance? http://pcpartpicker.com/p/mRwszy

i5 6400

[Mr.Meerkat]

1 minute ago, Mkander99 said:

I believe it is the i5-6500 but I may be wrong

 

SIDE NOTE: how does my build look and anything that could lower the price without sacrificing performance? http://pcpartpicker.com/p/mRwszy

windows from G2A or reddit

[007agentHP]

i5 6400

the i5 6500 is the 4590/4690 cpu equivalent 

[Mkander99]

1 minute ago, Mr.Meerkat said:

windows from G2A or reddit

no pirating bro

[MageTank]

Just now, Mkander99 said:

I believe it is the i5-6500 but I may be wrong

 

SIDE NOTE: how does my build look and anything that could lower the price without sacrificing performance? http://pcpartpicker.com/p/mRwszy

Technically, the Core i3 6100 can beat the 4460, even in some heavily threaded games:

 

http://www.techspot.com/review/1087-best-value-desktop-cpu/page4.html

 

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-core-i3-6100-review

 

Though, the 6400 would also be a good option, if one could afford it.

[Mkander99]

1 minute ago, Killstreak said:

i5 6400

doesnt that have lower single core performance?

[79wjd]

3 minutes ago, Mkander99 said:

doesnt that have lower single core performance?

Skylake has a higher IPC (instructions per clock) but a lower clock speed -- the two basically balance out. 

[mikat]

Just now, MageTank said:

Technically, the Core i3 6100 can beat the 4460, even in some heavily threaded games:

 

http://www.techspot.com/review/1087-best-value-desktop-cpu/page4.html

 

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-core-i3-6100-review

 

Though, the 6400 would also be a good option, if one could afford it.

6400 way worse performance per dollar, the 6500 is way better

[Mkander99]

1 minute ago, MageTank said:

Technically, the Core i3 6100 can beat the 4460, even in some heavily threaded games:

 

http://www.techspot.com/review/1087-best-value-desktop-cpu/page4.html

 

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-core-i3-6100-review

 

Though, the 6400 would also be a good option, if one could afford it.

yeah i want to get an i5 in the lga 1151 socket for MAXIMUM UPGRADE POWA!!!!

[Nena Trinity]

i5-6400 seems to be it!

[Enderman]

2 minutes ago, Mkander99 said:

no pirating bro

its technically not pirating

[79wjd]

5 minutes ago, Mkander99 said:

no pirating bro

That's not pirating. 

3 minutes ago, Mkander99 said:

yeah i want to get an i5 in the lga 1151 socket for MAXIMUM UPGRADE POWA!!!!

Yeah...I'd rather go with a 4690k for an extra $20. 

[Mkander99]

Im just gonna say fuck it and go for the i5-6500 because i need good cpu performance and it isnt TOO much more expensive

[Mkander99]

2 minutes ago, Enderman said:

its technically not pirating

its breaking microsoft's terms of service, or stealing from school grants

[MageTank]

5 minutes ago, mikat said:

6400 way worse performance per dollar, the 6500 is way better

Not really. The 6400 is $20 cheaper, which is a 10% difference. The 6500 will likely not give 10% more performance from its 300mhz boost clock. Technically, the difference is only 200mhz, if we compare quad core boost charts. All 4 cores of the 6400 can boost to 3100mhz. All 4 cores of the 6500 can boost to 3300mhz. Less than a 6.5% difference in clock speeds. You cannot tell me a 6.5% difference in clock speeds will equate to 10% more performance, which is what is required to justify the 10% difference in prices.

[Mr.Meerkat]

5 minutes ago, Mkander99 said:

no pirating bro

It's not pirating, you're still getting a fully legit key, just not a retail key but more an OEM key

 

Just now, Mkander99 said:

its breaking microsoft's terms of service, or stealing from school grants

They are basically all Hp or dell or whatever OEM keys

[Mkander99]

3 minutes ago, djdwosk97 said:

That's not pirating. 

Yeah...I'd rather go with a 4690k for an extra $20. 

1. its either breaking MS terms of service, or stealing from school grants, im buying a legit code and that is final

 

2. i said lga 1151 the 4690 is 1150, an older socket with no upgradability  

[79wjd]

4 minutes ago, Mkander99 said:

1. its either breaking MS terms of service, or stealing from school grants, im buying a legit code and that is final

 

2. i said lga 1151 the 4690 is 1150, an older socket with no upgradability  

1. Microsoft doesn't give a shit.

 

2. lol k, enjoy getting worse performance for your money. A 4690k will outclass a 6400 in every single way, and a 6700k is NEVER going to make a difference to the life of your system compared to a 4790k. If a 4790k won't be able to handle something, than neither will a 6700k.

[mikat]

7 minutes ago, MageTank said:

Not really. The 6400 is $20 cheaper, which is a 10% difference. The 6500 will likely not give 10% more performance from its 300mhz boost clock. Technically, the difference is only 200mhz, if we compare quad core boost charts. All 4 cores of the 6400 can boost to 3100mhz. All 4 cores of the 6500 can boost to 3300mhz. Less than a 6.5% difference in clock speeds. You cannot tell me a 6.5% difference in clock speeds will equate to 10% more performance, which is what is required to justify the 10% difference in prices.

depends on local prices

[MageTank]

Just now, mikat said:

depends on local prices

Exactly. Saying it has "way worse performance per dollar" would also be wrong in that context too, right? It would depend entirely on the geographical location of the consumer, any sales going on during that specific day, and other promotional factors. Either way, if we look strictly at Intel's MSRP prices, the 6400 has better price:performance when compared to the 6500. The only way i would recommend the 6500 over the 6400, is if someone is playing a lot of MMO's and needs the single threaded performance. Even then, an i3 clocked at 3.7 or even 3.9 would probably be a better performer on MMO's. 

[Mkander99]

4 minutes ago, mikat said:

depends on local prices

it is a $20 US difference but i need cpu power (multi and single core) and upgradability for this build so i will go with the 6500