Posted February 11, 2016 The title say by itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 most games if you tweak the settings will run 60fps at 1080p sure. The 380 still costs the same and performs all around better, but that's besides the point. Updated 2021 Desktop || 3700x || Asus x570 Tuf Gaming || 32gb Predator 3200mhz || 2080s XC Ultra || MSI 1440p144hz || DT990 + HD660 || GoXLR + ifi Zen Can || Avermedia Livestreamer 513 || New Home Dedicated Game Server || Xeon E5 2630Lv3 || 16gb 2333mhz ddr4 ECC || 2tb Sata SSD || 8tb Nas HDD || Radeon 6450 1g display adapter || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Depends on the game and used settings. It isn't a bad card. But I would highly suggest you get a 380, biggest reason would be 4gb vs 2gb vram Longboarders/ skaters message me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 grab a 380 or even a 380x if you can stretch Ryzen Ram Guide My Project Logs Iced Blood Temporal Snow Temporal Snow Ryzen Refresh CPU - Ryzen 1700 @ 4Ghz Motherboard - Gigabyte AX370 Aorus Gaming 5 Ram - 16Gb GSkill Trident Z RGB 3200 GPU - Palit 1080GTX Gamerock Premium Storage - Samsung XP941 256GB, Crucial MX300 525GB, Seagate Barracuda 1TB PSU - Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W Case - INWIN 303 White Display - Asus PG278Q Gsync 144hz 1440P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Yeah, its pretty good for 1080p, but you wont be able to max everything at will, especially in more demanding games like witcher 3... The general consensus on the forum is that you should go with a r9 380 if you can find it for the same price, as they perform a tad bit better, and have more vram. Cpu: Ryzen 2700 @ 4.0Ghz | Motherboard: Hero VI x370 | Gpu: EVGA RTX 2080 | Cooler: Custom Water loop | Ram: 16GB Trident Z 3000MHz PSU: RM650x + Braided cables | Case: painted Corsair c70 | Monitor: MSI 1440p 144hz VA | Drives: 500GB 850 Evo (OS) Laptop: 2014 Razer blade 14" Desktop: http://imgur.com/AQZh2sj , http://imgur.com/ukAXerd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Author Just now, IMPERIUS said: Depends on the game and used settings. It isn't a bad card. But I would highly suggest you get a 380, biggest reason would be 4gb vs 2gb vram I need the cuda cores : / And i pretend to buy a 4GB version , because i gonna render some stuff and You know , 2gb is kinda like...Not enought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 An R9 380 is around 15% better and usually cheaper. A 380X is 25% better and usually slightly more expensive Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280 3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD RedCelestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VTWindows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 1 minute ago, T-Aero said: I need the cuda cores : / And i pretend to buy a 4GB version , because i gonna render some stuff and You know , 2gb is kinda like...Not enought Unless you are using AutoCAD then OpenCL will do just as good and a 380X has double the stream processors of a 960 Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280 3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD RedCelestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VTWindows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 6 minutes ago, IMPERIUS said: Depends on the game and used settings. It isn't a bad card. But I would highly suggest you get a 380, biggest reason would be 4gb vs 2gb vram they make 4gb 960's ya know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Author 4 minutes ago, don_svetlio said: Unless you are using AutoCAD then OpenCL will do just as good and a 380X has double the stream processors of a 960 Cuda is a lot better them stream processors, (Depends on the architeture) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Author Just now, Cactusneedle_18 said: they make 4gb 960's ya know Yeah as i said i gonna buy a 4GB Gtx 960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Well if you really need the cuda cores then I guess the 4gb 960 is the better option. Whether or not you really need the cuda cores is up to you to research and decide Longboarders/ skaters message me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 7 minutes ago, T-Aero said: Cuda is a lot better them stream processors, (Depends on the architeture) Completely wrong. Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280 3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD RedCelestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VTWindows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Author Just now, IMPERIUS said: Well if you really need the cuda cores then I guess the 4gb 960 is the better option. Whether or not you really need the cuda cores is up to you to research and decide I gonna use some Adobe and others programs that have cuda Acceleration , so ... yes i need it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Author 1 minute ago, don_svetlio said: Completely wrong. So them the R9 380 Should cost a lot more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 1 minute ago, T-Aero said: So them the R9 380 Should cost a lot more Completely wrong again. Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280 3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD RedCelestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VTWindows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 4 minutes ago, don_svetlio said: Completely wrong. 2 minutes ago, T-Aero said: So them the R9 380 Should cost a lot more Fight Fight Fight, may the better researcher prevail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 And yet another topic where someone asks for a 960 and gets recommended a 380. This isn't at all an echo chamber, noooo. Pascal Undervolting topic, get more out of your card with less power! Why high refreshrate monitors look better even without Freesync/G-sync in one image.Stutters, framedrops, "lag". How to provide detailed information with your "bottleneck" question, as well as a few solutions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Just now, Cactusneedle_18 said: Fight Fight Fight, may the better researcher prevail It all boils down to software optimization and/or architecture. Saying "Cuda cores are better" without giving a reason is like saying "EA is the best" Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280 3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD RedCelestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VTWindows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 1 minute ago, don_svetlio said: It all boils down to software optimization and/or architecture. Saying "Cuda cores are better" without giving a reason is like saying "EA is the best" tell him not me, im just here with my popcorn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Just now, Majestic said: And yet another topic where someone asks for a 960 and gets recommended a 380. This isn't at all an echo chamber, noooo. If you can dig up the data that supports the 960, i will be happy to change my opinion. But the fact is that the 380 is both faster, and is about the same price. The 380x is much faster and only cost 10-15% more. Though the pricing may depend on which country you reside. Motherboard: Asus X570-E CPU: 3900x 4.3GHZ Memory: G.skill Trident GTZR 3200mhz cl14 GPU: AMD RX 570 SSD1: Corsair MP510 1TB SSD2: Samsung MX500 500GB PSU: Corsair AX860i Platinum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Author 1 minute ago, don_svetlio said: It all boils down to software optimization and/or architecture. Saying "Cuda cores are better" without giving a reason is like saying "EA is the best" But most of the time cuda is best, but the cores are more expensive , now, Stream processor are worst, but cheaper . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Just now, T-Aero said: But most of the time cuda is best, but the cores are more expensive , now, Stream processor are worst, but cheaper . ........................................................................................................... Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280 3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD RedCelestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VTWindows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 2 minutes ago, MMKing said: If you can dig up the data that supports the 960, i will be happy to change my opinion. But the fact is that the 380 is both faster, and is about the same price. The 380x is much faster and only cost 10-15% more. Though the pricing may depend on which country you reside. Except when new games release, and months afterwards. Yes the hardware is faster, I won't deny that. But lots of games struggle on AMD hardware these days on launch due to crap drivers, and not only "gimpworks" titles. And not all of them get 'fixed'. It's at the very least something to take into consideration. Spoiler Pascal Undervolting topic, get more out of your card with less power! Why high refreshrate monitors look better even without Freesync/G-sync in one image.Stutters, framedrops, "lag". How to provide detailed information with your "bottleneck" question, as well as a few solutions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted February 11, 2016 Just now, T-Aero said: But most of the time cuda is best, but the cores are more expensive , now, Stream processor are worst, but cheaper . Either provide a source or real head-to-head comparison between the two on even terms (none exist) or stop generalizing a GPU architecture without knowing what you are talking about. Cheaper? How? Source? Do you have an internal information on the raw materials and production costs? Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280 3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD RedCelestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VTWindows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now