Jump to content

GTX 960 SLI vs. GTX 970

SamTheMD

So I have been wondering this recently. Should I go with 2 GTX 960s or 1 970. I'm looking for a good new rig that will be able to record Minecraft @60fps WHILE recording. Easy. But with mod, shaders, bleh bleh. So yeah. I was just wondering what you guys would prefer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

go with the 390, no point in getting either of those cards at this point. plus java doesnt even support sli, so there would be no point in getting two cards for minecraft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Single fastest card you can buy. Always...

Spoiler

CPU: AMD R7 5800X | CPU Cooler: Corsair H115i PRO | Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO | Memory: G.Skill RIPJAWS V DDR4 3200mhz 64GB | GPU: EVGA RTX 3080Ti FTW3 Ultra | PSU: Seasonic Prime 1300w | OS Drive: Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500GB | Games Drive: Samsung 850 EVO SSD 1TB | Media Drive: 2x WD Blue HDD 1TB in Raid 0 | Media Drive: 2x WD Black HDD 2TB in Raid 1 | Case: Corsair Obsidian 750D | Monitor 1: ASUS PB287Q UHD | Monitor 2: ASUS PG278Q WQHD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

960 SLI is a bad choice no point in SLI mid range cards when there's single cards that can out do it stronger single card is always better, just get a 970 but personally I would get a R9 390

                                                                                                                 Setup

CPU: i3 4160|Motherboard: MSI Z97 PC MATE|RAM: Kingston HyperX Blue 8GB(2x4GB)|GPU: Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB|PSU: Seasonic M12II EVO 620W Modular|Storage: 1TB WD Blue|Case: NZXT S340 Black|PCIe devices: TP-Link WDN4800| Montior: ASUS VE247H| Others: PS3/PS4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I have been wondering this recently. Should I go with 2 GTX 960s or 1 970. I'm looking for a good new rig that will be able to record Minecraft @60fps WHILE recording. Easy. But with mod, shaders, bleh bleh. So yeah. I was just wondering what you guys would prefer.

970 for 60 fps on minecraft? i have a 760 and record and get 500+fps lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

970 for 60 fps on minecraft? i have a 760 and record and get 500+fps lol

I have a 980ti, i get 250 fps at 32 chunks max settings

If i put it on low i can get like 2000fps ish

 

 

EDIT: thats at 5760x1080

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

970 for 60 fps on minecraft? i have a 760 and record and get 500+fps lol

On my 870 I get like 130-250 xD:D :D :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

970

CPU: AMD FX-6300 4GHz @ 1.3 volts | CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO | RAM: 8GB DDR3

Motherboard: Gigabyte 970A-DS3P | GPU: EVGA GTX 960 SSC | SSD: 250GB Samsung 850 EVO

HDD: 1TB WD Caviar Green | Case: Fractal Design Core 2500 | OS: Windows 10 Home

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 980ti, i get 250 fps at 32 chunks max settings

If i put it on low i can get like 2000fps ish

 

 

EDIT: thats at 5760x1080

put on

shaders

32x MFAA

more anti-aliasing force through nvidia drivers

optifine, so everything should be maxed out

good luck getting 30 FPS

Rigs I've Built

The Striker i5 4590 @ 3.7 ||  MSI GTX 980 Armor X2 || Corsair RMX 750 || Team Elite Plus 8 GB || Define S || MSI Z97S SLI Krait

The Office PC i3 4160 @ 3.6 || Intel 4600 || EVGA 500B || G.Skill 8 GB || Cooler Master N200 || ASRock H97M Pro4

The Friend PC G3258 @ 4.3 || Sapphire R9 280X Tri-X || EVGA 600B || 8 GB Dell Ram || Cooler Master N200 || ASRock H97M- iTX/ac

The Mom Gaming PC A10-7890K @ 4.4 || iGPU + ASUS R7 250 ||  8 GB Klevv DDR3-2800 Mhz

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

R9 390, currently no reason to buy a 960 or 970 right now.

- CPU: Intel i7 3770 - GPU: MSI R9 390 - RAM: 16GB of DDR3 - SSD: Crucial BX100 - HDD: Seagate Barracuda 1TB -

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it all depends on your CPU, too. Although a killer GPU will help, Minecraft is also heavily CPU based, due to it being horribly optimized.. ;-;

My baby| CPU: Core i5-4690K  |  Motherboard: Asus Maximus Vii Hero  |  CPU Cooler: Hyper 212 Plus |   Case: Phanteks Enthoo Luxe | GPU: MSI R9 390  |  RAM: 16 GB - G.Skill Ripjaws X |

We brawlers are sustained by willpower, even if mocked as reckless and crazy! - Kamina

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

R9 380 is also a good choice but I prefer the R9 390. GTX 970 is also good but not better than R9 390

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

970, more vram, cheaper (at least here in UK)

Connection200mbps / 12mbps 5Ghz wifi

My baby: CPU - i7-4790, MB - Z97-A, RAM - Corsair Veng. LP 16gb, GPU - MSI GTX 1060, PSU - CXM 600, Storage - Evo 840 120gb, MX100 256gb, WD Blue 1TB, Cooler - Hyper Evo 212, Case - Corsair Carbide 200R, Monitor - Benq  XL2430T 144Hz, Mouse - FinalMouse, Keyboard -K70 RGB, OS - Win 10, Audio - DT990 Pro, Phone - iPhone SE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it all depends on your CPU, too. Although a killer GPU will help, Minecraft is also heavily CPU based, due to it being horribly optimized.. ;-;

I don't believe an unoptimized game is directly related to whether it's CPU intensive or not. At least I can't get my head around it. Can you pls quantify ?

Oh, and I would go with the 970 hands down.

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe an unoptimized game is directly related to whether it's CPU intensive or not. At least I can't get my head around it. Can you pls quantify ?

Oh, and I would go with the 970 hands down.

 

less efficient code = more instructions needed to get stuff down = cpu intensive o_0

Intel i5-4690K @ 3.8GHz || Gigabyte Z97X-SLI || 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws X 1600MHz || Asus GTX 760 2GB @ 1150 / 6400 || 128GB A-Data SX900 + 1TB Toshiba 7200RPM || Corsair RM650 || Fractal 3500W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

less efficient code = more instructions needed to get stuff down = cpu intensive o_0

Again, just because the game you are playing is CPU intensive does not mean that it is poorly optimized. Any game can be made to be CPU intensive by lowering settings to a point that the FPS gets high enough that the CPU has a hard time keeping up. A large part is also the settings and hardware being used. 

 

What you are saying isn't wrong but I was hoping for more than just a generic google translation.

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, just because the game you are playing is CPU intensive does not mean that it is poorly optimized. Any game can be made to be CPU intensive by lowering settings to a point that the FPS gets high enough that the CPU has a hard time keeping up. A large part is also the settings and hardware being used. 

 

What you are saying isn't wrong but I was hoping for more than just a generic google translation.

 

Oh I see what you mean yeah. I Mean the better the optimization is the lower CPU usage should be, however just because a game has high CPU usage doesnt mean it is poorly optimized

Intel i5-4690K @ 3.8GHz || Gigabyte Z97X-SLI || 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws X 1600MHz || Asus GTX 760 2GB @ 1150 / 6400 || 128GB A-Data SX900 + 1TB Toshiba 7200RPM || Corsair RM650 || Fractal 3500W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

go with the 390, no point in getting either of those cards at this point. plus java doesnt even support sli, so there would be no point in getting two cards for minecraft

 

You wouldn't need a SLI setup for minecraft anyways. My old GTX 650 ran Minecraft well over the 300FPS range.

 

 

So I have been wondering this recently. Should I go with 2 GTX 960s or 1 970. I'm looking for a good new rig that will be able to record Minecraft @60fps WHILE recording. Easy. But with mod, shaders, bleh bleh. So yeah. I was just wondering what you guys would prefer.

 

Think about what games you'll be playing and then compare the performance differences between the two cards. Also the 390 might be a good choice too.

We learn when we tinker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
On 9/19/2015 at 6:44 PM, SamTheMD said:

So I have been wondering this recently. Should I go with 2 GTX 960s or 1 970. I'm looking for a good new rig that will be able to record Minecraft @60fps WHILE recording. Easy. But with mod, shaders, bleh bleh. So yeah. I was just wondering what you guys would prefer.

it is all cpu.... gpu matters very little ...... my friend and i have the same gpu (gtx 970) but i have a i7 6700k and he has a fx 8320 (i think) he gets 50 fps on my server with a lot of entities and i get 200 fps... so it is all cpu my friend

 

btw i use shaders and i still get good fps recordin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×