Jump to content

Why clock speeds are not the best indicator or CPU ability's

So here is the story, i got into an argument with a buddy of mine about cpu's and price per performance and the x99 motherboard with the intell 5960x proccessor came up and with it his side of the argument stating that clock speeds are the only thing that matters as far as processors and that the 5960x was slow because of its 3GHz clock speed. Then i said clock speed was not the only thing that matters and i could not come up with reasons why, it was just what i was told. So i'm here looking for some higher knowledge people to educate me on why clock speeds are not the only thing that matters. Or if i'm wrong and it is in fact the only thing that matters. The AMD processor in the list below is the one he was comparing to the i7- 5960x and the i5 is my personal processor. As always thanks for the information. 

 

AMD FX-8350 Black Edition Vishera 8-Core 4.0GHz (4.2GHz Turbo) Socket AM3+ 125W (150$) 

 

 

Intel Core i5-4690K Devil's Canyon Quad-Core 3.5GHz LGA 1150 (250$) 

 

Intel Core i7-5960X Haswell-E 8-Core 3.0GHz LGA 2011-v3 140W (1000$)

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It also depends on IPC and instruction sets.

Using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

IPC: Instructions Per Clock

AMD CPUs don't have very good IPC compared to Intel's.

This is the same reason that older CPUs at the same speed as new CPUs aren't nearly as good.

G3258 @ 4.5 | 8GB Team Vulcan RAM | 128GB Kingston V300 SSD (I didn't know what I was doing when I bought it) | MSI H81I Motherboard | Corsair H55 with Noctua NF-P12 | EVGA SSC GTX 960 4GB | OCZ 550W Fully Modular PSU with Noctua NF-A14 | Cooler Master Elite 130 (Soon to be something cool)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as you are comparing two CPUs with the same architecture the clock speed is directly related to single core performance

but in multithreaded applications more slower cores can perform better than few fast ones

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have long material to read about

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megahertz_myth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_cycle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_Rating

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycles_per_instruction

 

if you want simplified things, just say IPC on intel is twice than AMD (or older technology by intel itself)

and when he asks prove, throw BENCHMARK number at him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he was right, my pentium 4 from 13 years ago would be faster than a 5960x.

Don't ask to ask, just ask... please 🤨

sudo chmod -R 000 /*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×