Someone thinks he knows pc

[BUREIDEN]

like derp

[Arty]

some people

[theloveablemoose]

How do you know hes a console gamer?

[Deletive]

He's really dumb.

[BUREIDEN]

like derp

 

say as if your yoda you will understand

[thekeemo]

To be fair it does get like one more fps...

[Pugs501]

[Speedyv]

The 770 is a bit better though....

[BUREIDEN]

The 770 is a bit better though....

 

yes it is but the 770 is a higher tier, 960 is a replacement for the 760. this kid is saying every gen of gpus gets less performance

[MrRavens]

Lol, just let him be. 

[Speedyv]

yes it is but the 770 is a higher tier, 960 is a replacement for the 760. this kid is saying every gen of gpus gets less performance

 

960 is more based on 660 but yea. His thinking is totally flawed or you are getting trolled. 

[Statik]

YOU STOP. NOTHING BEATS MY 770.

[Blade of Grass]

Moved to Graphics Cards.

[BUREIDEN]

Moved to Graphics Cards.

 

why thank you good sir here i must pay you a *cookie*

[han_han08]

well, for me nothing is certain until benchmarks 

 

using his logic, *10-*50 will get better and better after gen (low-tier), but nothing is certain using that logic before benchmarks

[Kawaii Besu]

like derp

LOL, didn't even do a counterexample on why his "logic is flawed".

BTW, what video is that? Want to see how the whole escalation turned out.

[andrewskaterrr]

yes it is but the 770 is a higher tier, 960 is a replacement for the 760. this kid is saying every gen of gpus gets less performance

 

No where did I say each gen of gpus gets less performance. Since you apparently have no logical thinking skills I'll make it real easy to understand. These are general steps and there is a slight difference in performance within each teir. It generally goes down one "model name". The performance can change with differnet settings, like how a 960 beats a 670 with no AA but the 670 wins with 4xMSAA or higher due to larger bus width, which results in higher bandwidths so overall they're close but the 960 is a tiny bit faster for the average gamer as running 4xMSAA will be too much of a performance drop for most gamers wanting 60+fps. When it comes to the x70 and x80 cards they usually will have an extra performance boost when new architexture is realeased like in the case of the 970/980 or whith slight overclocks on rebrands.

 

                     >                                                                                   > 980

                     > 780ti                                                                          > 

                     >                                                                                   > 970

                     > 780                                                                            >

                     >                                                                                   > 960ti?

680               > 770 (overclocked 680) rebrand                                 >

670               >                                                                                   > 960 (see above, is faster than 670 w/o AA)

                     > 760 (shoud've been 760ti, 670 - 192 cudas)             >

660ti             >                                                                                   >

660               >                                                                                   > 950ti?

650ti boost   > 750ti (new)                                                                 > 950?

650ti             > 750 (new)                                                                  >

650               >                                                                                   >

 

 

So, DUH, each generagetion gets faster but each new generation lower tier reaches the last gen higher teir. Not that hard of a concept.

[andrewskaterrr]

LOL, didn't even do a counterexample on why his "logic is flawed".

BTW, what video is that? Want to see how the whole escalation turned out.

 

[andrewskaterrr]

How do you know hes a console gamer?

 

I'm not. This dude just doesn't look at gpu benchmarks

[Yoinkerman]

I don't get it, he's more correct than less.

[Fgtfv567]

I've never seen that pattern before... Thanks for pointing it out

[TheBoneyKing]

like derp

Who's derp? Andrew? He's pretty spot on...

[incarnate]

seriously OP, naming and shaming is pretty low. if you disagree with a point or think something is stupid you should discuss it where you found it instead of making a post "Lulz so stoopid" to try and make fun of someone in a different thread.

 

besides, he is more or less correct in his point.

[xAcid9]

yes it is but the 770 is a higher tier, 960 is a replacement for the 760. this kid is saying every gen of gpus gets less performance

660*

[bobhays]

like derp

I'm seriously confused why this is such a terrible idea. This is how I estimate performance, like if someone asks me about the performance of a 780 i know that the closest 900 series is a 970.

 

Its pretty simple, they introduce a new performance king (980) and everything lower is equivalent to a level up on the older generation. I understand that it's not exactly the same cause it's not a rebrand and they have other changes but more or less it's a pretty solid estimation.

 

980ti = best

 

980 = 780ti + a little

 

970 = 780 + a little

 

you get the idea

The newer generation tends to be several frames faster than the previous gen but still comparable.