Why is Canned Air ok, but Vacuum Cleaner not?
Before I jump into an explanation I found elsewhere, your argument is quite good- is this just an internet thing where we blindly follow eachother? I'm bound to say yes, and also that perhaps not many people will be willing to try it out since you are risking damage to something that could have very well cost you >400$ over a 5$ can of air.
Argument(Source: http://bit.ly/1wx4Vw7, http://bit.ly/1LVIfHc (a few more are there, but converting them into bitlys to keep them organized is a bit painful))
A vacuum cleaner generates a large amount of static that if discharged to components will damage it since electronics are extremely sensitive to static electricity. The process by which this damages components is by producing an excess voltage that shorts electronic components (electronics such as the CPU operate with ~1.xxx volts, but the human body can store upto 15,000V)
Another point here is that the damage can take a long time, or can happen immediately, so even if something is exposed to static electricity, the effects may take a few weeks to show up in the form of the part dying out.
According to PCComputerNotes.com, newer integrated computer circuits known as complimentary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) chips are more susceptible to ESD than older chips. Most central processing units and system memory cards are CMOS chips.
My second source states that
It is not the vacuum cleaner's power source it's the static that builds up on the plastic nozzle. Since vacuuming isn't effective unless you hold the nozzle very close to the electronics you're cleaning, an electrostatic discharge is inevitable. Although there are a large number of people who've done this without damage, the possibility still exists.
If you are blowing out the dust with the vacuum cleaner, you don't have to hold the nozzle close to the motherboard. You still need to be cautious, but it's a much safer technique.
Hope this helps! (Personally, I would like a better explanation about how the static works in the damaging of the component, since I hate relying on anecdotes and would like a bit more of science behind this argument as to how it actually happens)
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now