Jump to content

ASUS 27-inch ROG Swift PG27AQ 4K Gaming Monitor with NVIDIA G-SYNC and IPS

BiG StroOnZ

It surely wouldn't support an higher fresh rate than 60Hz even in a lower resolution if it's already specify except if they don't use a stock IPS panel but much more a custom so not really an IPS with an extra module but how many that gonna cost yet???.

 

I think It would actually be better to go to the old QHD 1440p ROG Swift, the price as already start to drop down (I get mine last week for 680$) and actual gaming just start to go to a 1440p resolution,

 

Ok 4k is beautiful but not really ready & gonna be a standard for at least 2-3 years.

 

So if it's to play at 60Hz even with a bigger resolution, I really don't see the interest to go back when I can actually get a real decent 1440p resolution with a double higher 120-144Hz frequency.

 

 

"Innovation is the only way to progress"

"To every action there is always an opposed equal reaction"

"There is only one road, always straight"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice to see display tech moving forward, even slowly. For this kind of price I don't want any compromises. I'll wait for a monitor being 4K 144Hz <1ms freesync with AHVA like display but better quality and best responsiveness.

Cause paying so much for not getting a full package is a no.

Getting high res with low refresh rate or the other way oround and getting ugly TN or slow IPS.

No choosing, all is what I'll wait. It will take years, but worth it.

| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | AM5 B650 Aorus Elite AX | G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5 32GB 6000MHz C30 | Sapphire PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX | Samsung 990 PRO 1TB with heatsink | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 | Seasonic Focus GX-850 | Lian Li Lanccool III | Mousepad: Skypad 3.0 XL / Zowie GTF-X | Mouse: Zowie S1-C | Keyboard: Ducky One 3 TKL (Cherry MX-Speed-Silver)Beyerdynamic MMX 300 (2nd Gen) | Acer XV272U | OS: Windows 11 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not convinced about that 100%. With the IPS limitations, i wonder how they managed that. My guess is that they may have skimped on a few aspects. 

 

However, that is simply my speculations. If they did manage it somehow, I pray that it won't cost me an arm and a leg.

 

144hz ips is theoretically possible, but it has super bad ghosting

We'll see since Acer just announced there 144hz IPS-Like panel

Fixed

Specs: 4790k | Asus Z-97 Pro Wifi | MX100 512GB SSD | NZXT H440 Plastidipped Black | Dark Rock 3 CPU Cooler | MSI 290x Lightning | EVGA 850 G2 | 3x Noctua Industrial NF-F12's

Bought a powermac G5, expect a mod log sometime in 2015

Corsair is overrated, and Anime is ruined by the people who watch it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice to see display tech moving forward, even slowly. For this kind of price I don't want any compromises. I'll wait for a monitor being 4K 144Hz <1ms freesync with AHVA like display but better quality and best responsiveness.

Cause paying so much for not getting a full package is a no.

Getting high res with low refresh rate or the other way oround and getting ugly TN or slow IPS.

No choosing, all is what I'll wait. It will take years, but worth it.

Just go get yourself a the Acer 1440p 144Hz IPS monitor. You will wait quite long for a 144Hz 4K. Perhaps Volta/R9 590X can give you enough performance to make it 144Hz @ 4K... Also by then, 8K will be on the market... YouTube does not support 120-144Hz if you are looking into streaming...so in the end it only is competitive gaming which might somewhat benefit from that frame rate...

Intel Core i9-9900K | Asrock Phantom Gaming miniITX Z390 | 32GB GSkill Trident Z DDR4@3600MHz C17 | EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Watercooled | Samsung 970 EVO 1TB M.2 SSD | Crucial MX500 2TB SSD | Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 1000W | anidees AI Crystal Cube White V2 | Corsair M95 | Corsair K50 | Beyerdynamic DT770 Pros 250Ohm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

acer xr341ck > this

 

 

this asus is an amazing long needed addition in monitor market, but ... 21:9 with 144hz > all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gsync with no 144hz = useless   :(

 

And since not even tn 4k monitors can hadle 144hz because bandwith is not enough even for DP 1.2

 

*waits for 4k 144hz gsync for baller cs:go *

Corner peaking will get to a whole new level

Cpu:i5-4690k Gpu:r9 280x with some other things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

All we need now is 4K, IPS, 144Hz with g-sync/free sync.

Would be hard to drive 144 hz on this monitor without using low settings and or lower resolution

CPU: 4790K (4.8 ghz) | COOLING: Custom Liquid Cooling (240 mm rad) | GPU: GTX 980 ti Superclocked+ (2x)  | MOBO: Gryphon Z97 Armor Edition | RAM: Kingston (4x4 gb 1600 mhz) | SSD: 850 Evo (250 gb) | HDD: Black (1.5 tb) | CASE: Enthoo Evolv | PSU: G2 850 (850 w) | DISPLAYS: Acer XB270HU bprz / Philips 246V5LHAB/27 (3x) | KEYBOARD: Vengeance K60 | MOUSE: Naos 7000 | HEADSEAT: H Wireless / Cloud 2 | For the exact parts visit my PCPartpicker it even includes my Desk and some other stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

But oh the price...

i5 4670k @ 4.2GHz (Coolermaster Hyper 212 Evo); ASrock Z87 EXTREME4; 8GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3 RAM @ 2133MHz; Asus DirectCU GTX 560; Super Flower Golden King 550 Platinum PSU;1TB Seagate Barracuda;Corsair 200r case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be hard to drive 144 hz on this monitor without using low settings and or lower resolution

 

4-Way Titan X is your solution.

Spoiler
Spoiler

Project Depravity: £850 / ????? (03/12/2015) Case: Phanteks Enthoo Primo SE Red Keyboard: Corsair K95 RGB MX Red Monitors: 3* Asus PG279Q Stand: Ergotech Triple Desk Stand Webcam: Logitch C920

Spoiler

RIP in kill: CPU: Single core Celeron M @1.73GHz RAM: 1GB (512MB x2) DDR2 SO-DIMM Motherboard: Asus MOCA-AR HDD: 160GB SATA2 5400rpm

Spoiler

Current System: CPU: Intel i5-4690K Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO Motherboard: MSI Z97 Gaming 5 RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 8GB 1866MHz GPU: Gigabyte Windforce 960 4GB SSD: Sandisk Ultra Plus 128GB HDD: WD Caviar Blue 1TB PSU: Corsair CX500M Case: Corsair 200R Windowed MonitorLG 22MP55HQ 22" IPS + HP w19 MouseRoccat Savu Keyboard: Corsair Raptor K30 Mouse Pad: Perixx DX-1000XXL Headset: Kingston HyperX Cloud OS: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just go get yourself a the Acer 1440p 144Hz IPS monitor. You will wait quite long for a 144Hz 4K. Perhaps Volta/R9 590X can give you enough performance to make it 144Hz @ 4K... Also by then, 8K will be on the market... YouTube does not support 120-144Hz if you are looking into streaming...so in the end it only is competitive gaming which might somewhat benefit from that frame rate...

Current monitors are not a massive gap compared to what I have. Either it's crappy TN or slow IPS so I'd rather wait for something great! It doesn't mean I'd play games at 4K@144Hz just cause I want that kind of monitor, people always jump on that. Yes ofc I'd play some games, only those with eye candy to make them even more good looking, also 4K for desktop use.

Some games I'd play at low resolution and details for reasons, not lack of hardware power. I'd set 1080p or less for games like Quake and everything else that won't benefit from 4K.

Cause in FPS games I'd set stuff on off and put lowest settings no matter how strong hardware I have. I can see players way better and usually those kind of games or MP don't have top notch looks. 

| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | AM5 B650 Aorus Elite AX | G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5 32GB 6000MHz C30 | Sapphire PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX | Samsung 990 PRO 1TB with heatsink | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 | Seasonic Focus GX-850 | Lian Li Lanccool III | Mousepad: Skypad 3.0 XL / Zowie GTF-X | Mouse: Zowie S1-C | Keyboard: Ducky One 3 TKL (Cherry MX-Speed-Silver)Beyerdynamic MMX 300 (2nd Gen) | Acer XV272U | OS: Windows 11 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not convinced about that 100%. With the IPS limitations, i wonder how they managed that. My guess is that they may have skimped on a few aspects.

However, that is simply my speculations. If they did manage it somehow, I pray that it won't cost me an arm and a leg.

Look it up. It's technically not like other isp panels. Its an ISP type panel but its slightly different then what you find in regular isp panels. I don't know the exact details but there is another name for the isp 120hz-144hz panels. Its like high angle something or another. Idk but just google or Bing or what ever "isp 120hz panels" and read some articles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What we really need is a Nic ultra wide with these kind of specs except with 120hz (though you may not reach that with ultra wide at even 1080 but hey WHY NOT).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Current monitors are not a massive gap compared to what I have. Either it's crappy TN or slow IPS so I'd rather wait for something great! It doesn't mean I'd play games at 4K@144Hz just cause I want that kind of monitor, people always jump on that. Yes ofc I'd play some games, only those with eye candy to make them even more good looking, also 4K for desktop use.

Some games I'd play at low resolution and details for reasons, not lack of hardware power. I'd set 1080p or less for games like Quake and everything else that won't benefit from 4K.

Cause in FPS games I'd set stuff on off and put lowest settings no matter how strong hardware I have. I can see players way better and usually those kind of games or MP don't have top notch looks.

Ok... I thought you are jumping from some 1080p 60hz tn pannel to something better... And how come you dont get distracted from pixeleted looking frames? Im going for 4K for that reason. I don't wanna see pixels all over. A 27" screen looks horrible at 1080p, pixel density is so low, not to mension 1080p 40"+ tvs... 4K all the way. Idk how those console gamers are able to play on those big tvs, but since they dont care, maybe its fine...

Intel Core i9-9900K | Asrock Phantom Gaming miniITX Z390 | 32GB GSkill Trident Z DDR4@3600MHz C17 | EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Watercooled | Samsung 970 EVO 1TB M.2 SSD | Crucial MX500 2TB SSD | Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 1000W | anidees AI Crystal Cube White V2 | Corsair M95 | Corsair K50 | Beyerdynamic DT770 Pros 250Ohm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4-Way Titan X is your solution.

Well if that is a realistic setup

CPU: 4790K (4.8 ghz) | COOLING: Custom Liquid Cooling (240 mm rad) | GPU: GTX 980 ti Superclocked+ (2x)  | MOBO: Gryphon Z97 Armor Edition | RAM: Kingston (4x4 gb 1600 mhz) | SSD: 850 Evo (250 gb) | HDD: Black (1.5 tb) | CASE: Enthoo Evolv | PSU: G2 850 (850 w) | DISPLAYS: Acer XB270HU bprz / Philips 246V5LHAB/27 (3x) | KEYBOARD: Vengeance K60 | MOUSE: Naos 7000 | HEADSEAT: H Wireless / Cloud 2 | For the exact parts visit my PCPartpicker it even includes my Desk and some other stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok 4k is beautiful but not really ready & gonna be a standard for at least 2-3 years.

Titan X SLI would like to say hi.

But yeah, fuck 4K just because of 60Hz.

I have a Swift and i'm loving it with my 980 SLI at 1507Mhz.

If the Titan X is around 1K i'll switch to two of those.

“The mind of the bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it the more it will contract” -Oliver Wendell Holmes “If it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth.” -Carl Sagan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... I thought you are jumping from some 1080p 60hz tn pannel to something better... And how come you dont get distracted from pixeleted looking frames? Im going for 4K for that reason. I don't wanna see pixels all over. A 27" screen looks horrible at 1080p, pixel density is so low, not to mension 1080p 40"+ tvs... 4K all the way. Idk how those console gamers are able to play on those big tvs, but since they dont care, maybe its fine...

Yeah being able to see pixels, specially when reading is annoying. But can't wait to get some uber monitor. But for something I don't need more than 1024x768 4:3 with ton of FPS, hence this pic can show you why. Screenshot

 

| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | AM5 B650 Aorus Elite AX | G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5 32GB 6000MHz C30 | Sapphire PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX | Samsung 990 PRO 1TB with heatsink | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 | Seasonic Focus GX-850 | Lian Li Lanccool III | Mousepad: Skypad 3.0 XL / Zowie GTF-X | Mouse: Zowie S1-C | Keyboard: Ducky One 3 TKL (Cherry MX-Speed-Silver)Beyerdynamic MMX 300 (2nd Gen) | Acer XV272U | OS: Windows 11 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah being able to see pixels, specially when reading is annoying. But can't wait to get some uber monitor. But for something I don't need more than 1024x768 4:3 with ton of FPS, hence this pic can show you why. Screenshot

Ok...true. Quake Live!

Intel Core i9-9900K | Asrock Phantom Gaming miniITX Z390 | 32GB GSkill Trident Z DDR4@3600MHz C17 | EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Watercooled | Samsung 970 EVO 1TB M.2 SSD | Crucial MX500 2TB SSD | Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 1000W | anidees AI Crystal Cube White V2 | Corsair M95 | Corsair K50 | Beyerdynamic DT770 Pros 250Ohm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dropping the "ROG" name and "For Gamers" fluff will probably drop the price tag a few hundred alone.

Correct. But gsync still adds a lot to monitir's price.

Connection200mbps / 12mbps 5Ghz wifi

My baby: CPU - i7-4790, MB - Z97-A, RAM - Corsair Veng. LP 16gb, GPU - MSI GTX 1060, PSU - CXM 600, Storage - Evo 840 120gb, MX100 256gb, WD Blue 1TB, Cooler - Hyper Evo 212, Case - Corsair Carbide 200R, Monitor - Benq  XL2430T 144Hz, Mouse - FinalMouse, Keyboard -K70 RGB, OS - Win 10, Audio - DT990 Pro, Phone - iPhone SE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Any news regarding the price or release date?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×