Ryzen 5 7600 (non X) high idle temps 49 Degrees

[kzoxi]

Hello I just put together a new computer and I am slightly concerned.The CPU idles at exactly 49 Degrees which I consider slightly high.I also run a cinebench test and the temps didn't go above 85. Is it temps I should be concerned about any of this. I have no idea if it helps but one core seems to be running 10 degrees less in high tests.?

[podkall]

Stock cooler?

 

 

It's not really that concerning if you're rocking just a stock cooler.

[PDifolco]

7 minutes ago, kzoxi said:

Hello I just put together a new computer and I am slightly concerned.The CPU idles at exactly 49 Degrees which I consider slightly high.I also run a cinebench test and the temps didn't go above 85. Is it temps I should be concerned about any of this. I have no idea if it helps but one core seems to be running 10 degrees less in high tests.?

Normal, that's Ryzen, clock rises to max as soon as some task arrive, even if it's a windows background task, so some core always gets hot

My 5900X "idles" (browsing) at 43-45C usually

[Mando772004]

my 7950X3D idles at 40-50c so thats normal dont worry about it

[podkall]

There's few ways you could decrease these temps a bit if you'd like to know.

 

[kzoxi]

11 minutes ago, podkall said:

Stock cooler?

 

 

It's not really that concerning if you're rocking just a stock cooler.

Deep Cool AK400

[kzoxi]

7 minutes ago, podkall said:

There's few ways you could decrease these temps a bit if you'd like to know.

 

Well from what people said it should be ok I'm just stressing too much it's my first build after all . But sure I would gladly like to hear what I can do.

[kzoxi]

11 minutes ago, Mando772004 said:

my 7950X3D idles at 40-50c so thats normal dont worry about it

Thanks you very much for the reply! Good to know that it's not going to explode on me or anything .

[PDifolco]

9 minutes ago, podkall said:

There's few ways you could decrease these temps a bit if you'd like to know.

 

But it's useless, 35C isn't any better than 50C

[kzoxi]

15 minutes ago, PDifolco said:

Normal, that's Ryzen, clock rises to max as soon as some task arrive, even if it's a windows background task, so some core always gets hot

My 5900X "idles" (browsing) at 43-45C usually

Thank you too for your answer I've been stressing to much about it but it's good to be able to relax about it and start enjoying my PC.

[podkall]

2 minutes ago, kzoxi said:

Deep Cool AK400

I have AG400, these are my temps right now, the program was turned on few minutes after I read your post, I have 5600 Ryzen:

 

• Notice how at one point my CPU was almost 45°C on the CCD

 

Just now, PDifolco said:

But it's useless, 35C isn't any better than 50C

if it pleases their eye, my CPU also maxes out at no more than 70C and that's with voltage offset it might aswell go at 75C during Cinebench

[podkall]

Just now, podkall said:

I have AG400, these are my temps right now, the program was turned on few minutes after I read your post, I have 5600 Ryzen:

also I'm just on Firefox browser and have few background apps open and that's it

[PDifolco]

2 minutes ago, kzoxi said:

Thank you too for your answer I've been stressing to much about it but it's good to be able to relax about it and start enjoying my PC.

You really shouldn't care about idle temps (unless they're crazy high), as long as full load don't approach throttling temp by say 5C

[podkall]

3 minutes ago, PDifolco said:

You really shouldn't care about idle temps (unless they're crazy high), as long as full load don't approach throttling temp by say 5C

I wonder if hardware made like this impacts the global warming..

[PDifolco]

2 minutes ago, podkall said:

I wonder if hardware made like this impacts the global warming..

Your cooling doesn't change anything to global warming, it's the same amount of heat that is generated, just spread out more or less quickly from your  PC to the room then outside !

[podkall]

2 minutes ago, PDifolco said:

Your cooling doesn't change anything to global warming, it's the same amount of heat that is generated, just spread out more or less quickly from your  PC to the room then outside !

if I'm undervolting/voltage offsetting the CPU drinks less juice heating up less though

[PDifolco]

2 minutes ago, podkall said:

if I'm undervolting/voltage offsetting the CPU drinks less juice heating up less though

Not necessarily, what counts essentially is power consumption, I've undervolted my 5900X and can still go up to 220W if I don't limit it

 

[podkall]

1 minute ago, PDifolco said:

Not necessarily, what counts essentially is power consumption, I've undervolted my 5900X and can still go up to 220W if I don't limit it

 

but if your CPU outputs less heat then the remaining heat + power plant are the remainders

[YoungBlade]

19 hours ago, podkall said:

but if your CPU outputs less heat then the remaining heat + power plant are the remainders

The heat from your CPU is equivalent to the Watts it draws. You can treat a CPU as a resistive electric heater for the purposes of heat generation.

 

If your CPU draws 60W, then it is equivalent to using an old 60W light bulb in terms of the heat it puts off.

 

Reducing the power consumption does reduce the heat, and it would have an impact on how much power (and thus emissions) is generated by your power plant, assuming it uses fossil fuels rather than solar, wind, nuclear, or hydro.

 

Actual heat output is negligible for the purposes of climate change - it's the emissions of greenhouse gases that matter. The Sun gives us way more energy, and thus heat, in a single day than what humans produce in a year. It's the trapping of that solar energy that heats the planet, not us running space heaters or whatever.

[podkall]

1 hour ago, YoungBlade said:

The heat from your CPU is equivalent to the Watts it draws. You can treat a CPU as a resistive electric heater for the purposes of heat generation.

 

If your CPU draws 60W, then it is equivalent to using an old 60W light bulb in terms of the heat it puts off.

 

Reducing the power consumption does reduce the heat, and it would have an impact on how much power (and thus emissions) is generated by your power plant, assuming it uses fossil fuels rather than solar, wind, nuclear, or hydro.

 

Actual heat output is negligible for the purposes of climate change - it's the emissions of greenhouse gases that matter. The Sun gives us way more energy, and thus heat, in a single day than what humans produce in a year. It's the trapping of that solar energy that heats the planet, not us running space heaters or whatever.

I think it adds up, wouldn't you, there's lot of us here, some of us own several cars, and drive those cars, and while cars aren't the main cause of neither heat or gasses, it's not negligible, it's only negligible when you factor in power plants and factories and whatnot,

and let's not forget the revolutionary electric vehicles, powered by those smoky power plants mainly since there's not much else on average where they can get the electricity from...

[YoungBlade]

20 minutes ago, podkall said:

I think it adds up, wouldn't you, there's lot of us here, some of us own several cars, and drive those cars, and while cars aren't the main cause of neither heat or gasses, it's not negligible, it's only negligible when you factor in power plants and factories and whatnot,

and let's not forget the revolutionary electric vehicles, powered by those smoky power plants mainly since there's not much else on average where they can get the electricity from...

All nations on Earth combined produce around 15,000-25,000 TWh of electricity every year depending on your source. Which is a lot of heat, sure.

 

But then you realize that the Sun gives us 175,000 TWh of energy every hour, or about 2.7 billion TWh every year. Which is 5 orders of magnitude higher than the high end estimates for electricity generation.

 

In other words, all of our computers, light bulbs, electric stoves, electric cars, etc. from all humans everywhere at once, contribute 0.001% of the heat energy that hits Earth from the Sun.

 

Global warming is caused by greenhouse gasses trapping heat from the Sun, not from the heat produced by electrical generators or devices.

[podkall]

21 minutes ago, YoungBlade said:

All nations on Earth combined produce around 15,000-25,000 TWh of electricity every year depending on your source. Which is a lot of heat, sure.

 

But then you realize that the Sun gives us 175,000 TWh of energy every hour, or about 2.7 billion TWh every year. Which is 5 orders of magnitude higher than the high end estimates for electricity generation.

 

In other words, all of our computers, light bulbs, electric stoves, electric cars, etc. from all humans everywhere at once, contribute 0.001% of the heat energy that hits Earth from the Sun.

 

Global warming is caused by greenhouse gasses trapping heat from the Sun, not from the heat produced by electrical generators or devices.

yes power plants, they do the smoke brother