Jump to content

Why do Schools use MACS?

mr.skyrim_pc

I'm actually not sure what the specs are for the smaller imac, but the larger of the two has a quality display that'd cost a lot if you get something that isn't one of those cheap Korean monitors. :V

I just know its ips, 1080p, and 21.5 inches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually not sure what the specs are for the smaller imac, but the larger of the two has a quality display that'd cost a lot if you get something that isn't one of those cheap Korean monitors. :V

Im guessing its not that fast though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, my school uses pc's but the only thing that holds them together is dust. if schools knew what a good pc was, the world would be a better place 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In both primary and high school I've been forced to use macs. What saddens me more is that the other kids in my class would get excited when we were using them :( it's just my opinion though, I just hate using osx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

same, even though I have a mac,  I had a really nice vaio and it died, the only half decent machine that I could exchange it for is a mac and I cant wait to get rid of it. schools normally pick whats cheap or they ask parents to buy a computer for the child. We should be able to choose what we play games on during boring science lessons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apple designs they're computers for education and to get real work done.

Students actually improve their learning with macs raising their grades.

 

When I was in elementary we got to take a mac home everyday. My grade went from a C to a B+.

Incredible difference in how much it made to my education and others.

LinusGGtips

Build It. Mod It. Customize It.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Main reason is that there is less maintenance on a Mac. Install them and leave them

Work Desktop | CPU: Intel Core i7 4770k | GPU: Quadro K1200 | Motherboard: EVGA Z97 Classified | RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3-2133Mhz | PSU: Seasonic 750W SS-750KM3 80 PLUS Gold | STORAGE: WD 1TB Se Enterprise Grade Drive & Corsair Neutron NX500 400GB NVMe PCIe  | COOLER: Enermax Liqtech 240 -  5x Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 2000 PWM | CASE: Corsair 600C | OS: Windows 10 Pro | Peripherals: Logitech MX Master 2S -- Logitech K840 -- INTEL X520 10Gb NIC -- 3x Acer H236HL -- Build Log | 

 

Work Server | CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | Model: Cisco UCS C220 M4 (SFF) | RAM: 64GB (4x16GB) Cisco (Samsung) DDR4 2133Mhz | STORAGE: 4x Cisco (Seagate) 900GB 10K 2.5" (RAID 10) - 2x 32GB Cisco FlexFlash Boot Drive (RAID 1) | OS: vSphere 6.7 Enterprise Plus U3 | 

 

Laptop | CPU: Intel Core i7 6700HQ | GPU: Nvidia GTX 960M 2GB GDDR5 | RAM: 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-2400Mhz | STORAGE: 512GB Hynix NVMe | OS: Windows 10 Pro |

 

Gaming Desktop | CPU: Intel Core i7 9700K | GPU: Gigabyte RTX 2080 WINDFORCE 8G  | Motherboard: ASRock Z390 PHANTOM GAMING-ITX | RAM: Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (16GB x 2) DDR4-3000 | PSU: Silverstone SX700-LPT 700w 80 PLUS Platinum | STORAGE: 2x Samsung 970 PRO 1TB NVMe | COOLER: Noctua NH-L12 | CASE: Louqe Ghost S1 | OS: Windows 10 Pro | Build Log in Progress | 

 

Home Server | CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 (Sandy Bridge) | GPU: Quadro P2000 | Motherboard: SUPERMICRO X9SRL-F  | RAM: 64GB (8x8GB) Micron VLP DDR3-1600 ECC | PSU: SUPERMICRO 665W 80 PLUS Bronze | STORAGE: 2x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB (RAID 1) - 4x WD 8TB Ultrastar (RAID 10) - Intel SSD D3-S4510 Series 240GB (BOOT)  | COOLER: Noctua NH-U12DXi4 with 2x Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 3000 PWM | CASE: SUPERMICRO CSE-842TQ-665B 4U | OS: vSphere 6.7 Enterprise Plus U3 | Build Log in Progress |

 

| Pixel 4XL 128GB - Clearly White - Unlocked - Carrier: Visible |

 

| F@H STATS |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It honestly depends on what you can be more productive on and what you're used to. Personally PC's RULE and I can do anything and everything on them. Ans in my experience, you are correct, Schols just want an ancient piece of computing that will just suit what 'the average student' needs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If 99% of the people who have contributed so far actually used a Mac for a considerable amount of time performing a wide variety of functions on the machines, then they would understand the view that the people who are for Macs have written about.

 

One thing to point out after seeing one post of someone (out of not very many in this forum) who has an idea of Windows server systems is that Apple have their equivalent of the Active Directory in Mac OS X Server (see, if you don't know anything about this, then you should stop posting on this) called Open Directory. Machines are joined to this directory very quickly and easily. (In addition, if the school or office used a combination of Mac and Windows systems, Macs can join the Active Directory natively as if it was another Windows machine). OS X Server also has many extra features in terms of collaboration, file, user and other management and server applications.

 

Schools and offices will typically buy a fleet of branded machines to simplify fleet management. If anyone has had any experience in dealing with this sort of thing then you wouldn't be talking either. The reason for this is simplifying maintenance and software changes. They will only buy Workstation/Corporate grade machines which are more expensive yet more durable. Apple, Dell, Lenovo and HP are examples of these brands. They also offer much better support and warranty than consumer grade machines. This is why they do not build computers themselves; not only is it a waste of time but in the long-term they will be disadvantaged. These brands also offer fleet management software so they can easily track and find errors with the machines. People who are posting links to PCPartPicker etc. cannot win this argument because you are comparing computers from two different grades for two+ different uses, even if you pick workstation grade parts.

 

By having a simplified, standardised and consolidated fleet, maintenance is far easier. You only need one (or just a few depending on the infrastructure) image to deploy across all of the computers via the network, only a small variety of replacement parts. If a machine breaks down, a simple swap will fix the issue and students/employees wouldn't even notice.

 

In terms of speed, Macs can be just as fast as Windows machines. You cannot simply compare spec for spec as the software that runs on them is different. OS X typically, from my own personal experience and comments from others, far smoother than Windows, especially as it ages. Again if you used one for an extended period of time then you would be able to see this.

 

The only reason why people find Macs hard to use is because they are Windows/other OS users. They are not willing to learn the system thoroughly because they are simply saying to themselves the whole time, "this is hard/crap to use". If people were more open to change and adaption then they would find that it is actually easier to use, especially for people who may be more computer literate than others. I know most people on this forum will fall into this category, but not the 80% rest of the world.

 

The opinions here are very biased and do not understand the whole concept of managing a fleet of computer systems. Apple have created a model which suits IT managers managing a fleet of computers that works very well, better than many other brands that do the same thing. Apple also offer educational pricing on top of additional benefits. Other brands do also do that but have found to not have as many benefits as Apple does.

 

Too many posts here are purely judgmental and do not reflect the reality and truth that needs to be made clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the school where i work, its given to music students. all other students gets Win7 machines.

| CPU: intel i7 3820 OC to 4GHZ with H100i cooling | Case: Enthoo Evolv ATX glass | Mobo: Asus P9X79 Socket-2011 | RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 MHz 16GB | GPU: MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X

| PSU: Silver power 750w plus silver | SSD: OCZ Agility 3, 240GB / Toshiba 500GB | Monitors: Dell U2713HM, Acer Predator 27" | Headset: Sennheiser HD650| Soundcard: Xonar Essence STX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Hade mecs...

[spoiler= Dream machine (There is also a buildlog)]

Case: Phanteks Enthoo Luxe - CPU: I7 5820k @4.4 ghz 1.225vcore - GPU: 2x Asus GTX 970 Strix edition - Mainboard: Asus X99-S - RAM: HyperX predator 4x4 2133 mhz - HDD: Seagate barracuda 2 TB 7200 rpm - SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB SSD - PSU: Corsair HX1000i - Case fans: 3x Noctua PPC 140mm - Radiator fans: 3x Noctua PPC 120 mm - CPU cooler: Fractal design Kelvin S36 together with Noctua PPCs - Keyboard: Corsair K70 RGB Cherry gaming keyboard - mouse: Steelseries sensei raw - Headset: Kingston HyperX Cloud Build Log

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

its idiot proof thats why

If your grave doesn't say "rest in peace" on it You are automatically drafted into the skeleton war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see your point, but the general gist of macs is that they are 'creative orientated'  but when it comes to writing a simple document or using the worst mac program ever created, numbers, to create a graph they are useless compared to PC's. Schools just want to provide a simple option that most students can use. The cost of macs can also be a complete joke, (yes i know that they don't need virus protection) but if you are the student who has been asked to buy a mac for school the cost can be upwards of $2500, and for a computer that is not orientated towards creating simple documents, that price is beyond crazy. I go to a school which uses macs, PC's and IPad's, and the general view is that the macs are just not made for schools and IPad's are better charging than being actually used. The PC's are versatile, easy to use, and accept a usb when you need to save a document. Apple tried to design a mac that would be perfect in a school environment but the environment that they were imagining had no students in it, not every student has a mac, as soon as you get home, if you even try to open a pages document on a PC it changes everything you've done to the document and it looks completely different. schools should base what computers they use by what the majority of the students use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

At my school starting next year they are bringing in Macs, although all students must buy their own.

 

As others have said, the idea that they don't need much maintenance is pretty accurate for UNIBODY MBPs and MBAs. The old MacBooks made of plastic are awfully built. 

 

I have had a MBP for 3 years now. I hate it through and through, but its lasted. I use it around 12 hours every day and I have had a few bicycle crashes with it in my bag. The only damage it has sustained is one of the rubber feet fell out so I taped it back on. Also the hinge on the left side is a little loose. There are some strange bumps on underside around where the HDD is though...

 

Anyway. They last, build quality is incredible.  I guess I can see that as an advantage for a school.

 

In 3 years it hasn't needed any maintenance or replacement parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lenovo, Toshiba and Panasonic. All of these brands make 'tough oriented PC's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see your point, but the general gist of macs is that they are 'creative orientated'  but when it comes to writing a simple document or using the worst mac program ever created, numbers, to create a graph they are useless compared to PC's. Schools just want to provide a simple option that most students can use. The cost of macs can also be a complete joke, (yes i know that they don't need virus protection) but if you are the student who has been asked to buy a mac for school the cost can be upwards of $2500, and for a computer that is not orientated towards creating simple documents, that price is beyond crazy. I go to a school which uses macs, PC's and IPad's, and the general view is that the macs are just not made for schools and IPad's are better charging than being actually used. The PC's are versatile, easy to use, and accept a usb when you need to save a document. Apple tried to design a mac that would be perfect in a school environment but the environment that they were imagining had no students in it, not every student has a mac, as soon as you get home, if you even try to open a pages document on a PC it changes everything you've done to the document and it looks completely different. schools should base what computers they use by what the majority of the students use.

 

This is why many schools and offices actually deploy Microsoft Office across their Mac fleets so it is easier to deal with compatibility issues. I agree with the iPad comment in terms of its use in schools, however Macs can be used just like any other machine. Most programs that are used within schools will have versions for both OS X and Windows. The cost of Macs within schools is discounted by educational pricing, and I believe if you bulk buy, you get a further discount plus other benefits on top of that. If students are asked to buy Macs then that is different. I don't know what the education system is like in regards to BYOD outside of Australia but here, if schools use Mac networks, they will usually provide them to the students who will then return them once they finish school.

 

Lenovo, Toshiba and Panasonic. All of these brands make 'tough oriented PC's

 

Lenovo does in terms of fleets, however not Toshiba and Panasonic. You cannot think about a machine alone, you need to think on a wider scale (i.e. the entire fleet) and in the long term as schools and offices cannot afford to replace tens, maybe hundreds of computers regularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Dude it was just an example build trying to match spec for spec what the mac had, plus I went for very high quality components not the cheapest since apple components are generally extremely high quality. Also I felt that the monitor I chose was closer to the fantastic LG IPS panel that apple use.

 

You still have to take into account the mac coming with a high quality wireless keyboard and mouse, as well as extra software such as iMovie, iPhoto, Garageband (which are all really great) as well as Pages Numbers Keynote etc, I know a lot of schools are using iPads so having these programs will be of great use. Obviously they can still install microsoft office etc on there so no problems with compatibility.

 

Anyway the point I was making is its not like they are TWICE the price, they are maybe 100/200 bucks more spec for spec. Considering that schools often get educational discount that is better than the usual price you get from store, they often get great deals on warranty etc. 

 

They would also never use consumer grade parts, they wouldnt self build a PC, even if they went custom they would pay labour charges for somebody to build and warranty them.

 

It is not as expensive as people make out in the long run. 

 

Anyway, none of this is helpful to the OP

 

Basically, with educational discount and support, the wealth of software that comes included with OSX, the build quality, reliability and warranty that come with the macs are great. They are very easy to set up and integrate, they are compatible with all the software educational establishments need and often last a long time, they are a great financial investment

Desktop - Corsair 300r i7 4770k H100i MSI 780ti 16GB Vengeance Pro 2400mhz Crucial MX100 512gb Samsung Evo 250gb 2 TB WD Green, AOC Q2770PQU 1440p 27" monitor Laptop Clevo W110er - 11.6" 768p, i5 3230m, 650m GT 2gb, OCZ vertex 4 256gb,  4gb ram, Server: Fractal Define Mini, MSI Z78-G43, Intel G3220, 8GB Corsair Vengeance, 4x 3tb WD Reds in Raid 10, Phone Oppo Reno 10x 256gb , Camera Sony A7iii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I attend school in Aus, and from my point of view the school population is too PC oriented to start using macs at school

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I attend school in Aus, and from my point of view the school population is too PC oriented to start using macs at school

 

To switch from a PC school to a Mac school is a very difficult task that many schools would not do at all. Same applies in the reverse. Not only is it a user problem but it is also a software issue. That's not the point though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

when it comes to laptops and desktops the majority of the world population uses PC's

when it comesto web clients the majority of the world population uses Windows Oses's

Microsoft still dominates the world with their programs and judging by the current statistics it is better to learn how to use a PC while at school. Even if you dont use PC's or computers in your profession you will still retain a vital piece of information. We don't know where apple will be in the future, it is a safer bet to learn and create on a PC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

They shouldn't, price : performance is terrible and that is huge when it is with a schools budget. I guess you could use the argument they have easy to use apps for students to learn and use?

Taking into account possible education rebates, and maintenance costs Mac could possibly be the cheaper option considering the schools IT situation.

 

Licensing for Windows is very expensive as well, this is especially important since Mavericks is a free operating system. For windows the school would need a Windows Server, Windows OS for the workstations and many CAL's.

 

There is also Office for Mac, and Office 365 supports Mac.

 

There is no problem with a school using Mac, however if the school offers advanced Information Technology courses Windows machines need to be available for the class.

 

Also Unix is great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

when it comes to laptops and desktops the majority of the world population uses PC's

when it comesto web clients the majority of the world population uses Windows Oses's

Microsoft still dominates the world with their programs and judging by the current statistics it is better to learn how to use a PC while at school. Even if you dont use PC's or computers in your profession you will still retain a vital piece of information. We don't know where apple will be in the future, it is a safer bet to learn and create on a PC.

 

It's nice to have multiple skills. People need to learn to be able to adapt and change, one of the biggest issues gripping society today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no problem with a school using Mac, however if the school offers advanced Information Technology courses Windows machines need to be available for the class.

 

Run them in virtual machines - easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

But is it safe to adapt and change? apple has had a violent financial history, during the 90's apple's existence as a company was in jeopardy, we don't know if they will exist in the future.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×