Jump to content

So as of rn I have a rtx 3060 strix and I really want to mine but  there is a issue. Im just way too paranoid that its going to wear down my components or damage it or something because I would like to mine when im sleeping, gone, at work etc... I cant really afford new parts if something bad occurred but at the same time having work done without your labor is pretty awesome. (Also im not countering in the electricity bill factor"

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1515529-question-about-mining/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TurkishBTW said:

So as of rn I have a rtx 3060 strix and I really want to mine but  there is a issue. Im just way too paranoid that its going to wear down my components or damage it or something because I would like to mine when im sleeping, gone, at work etc... I cant really afford new parts if something bad occurred but at the same time having work done without your labor is pretty awesome. (Also im not countering in the electricity bill factor"

a GPU is designed to run at 100% full speed 24/7 as long as the GPU temperatures are resonable.   Yes the fans might wear down slightly faster and the general life span may be shortened by a few %, but as long as temps are good the card doesn't know if its mining or playing WoW 18 hours a day.  Just remember to keep the GPU fans clean with compressed air more often as your PC will be running all the time.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1515529-question-about-mining/#findComment-16004680
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emosun said:

thats the first i've ever heard of that

What do you mean? Its obviously designed to push max frames all the time so running the GPU with 100% GPU usage while gaming is what its made for.  If its 3 hours, 7 hours or 24 hours a day, makes no difference.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1515529-question-about-mining/#findComment-16004691
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TurkishBTW said:

so his answer is false?

1 minute ago, Hinjima said:

What do you mean?


i'm not aware of any high end gpus that are designed to run at 100% load indefinitely. I know of plenty of lower end display chips that simply cannot generate enough heat that can run at 100% usage indefinitely.

Most gpu's don't use very high quality thermal paste or pads and the hotter they run the quicker thermal interface depletes thus requiring service more often. Video games aren't really going to load a gpu to 100% usage the same as a compute task will.

So expecting the laws of physics to just bend to your intentions isn't super smart when considering thermal runaway over time.

Of course i'm sure the coin miners that are pressure washing pallets of gpu's in their driveway only donate to the most ethical charities and always wear their seat belts so theres no situation where a gpu running hotter somehow has any sort of effect.

but i'd love to hear the classic oldies and hits from the "mining hardware isn't worn out" radio station if you'd like to play them.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1515529-question-about-mining/#findComment-16004703
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emosun said:


i'm not aware of any high end gpus that are designed to run at 100% load indefinitely. I know of plenty of lower end display chips that simply cannot generate enough heat that can run at 100% usage indefinitely.

Most gpu's don't use very high quality thermal paste or pads and the hotter they run the quicker thermal interface depletes thus requiring service more often. Video games aren't really going to load a gpu to 100% usage the same as a compute task will.

So expecting the laws of physics to just bend to your intentions isn't super smart when considering thermal runaway over time.

Of course i'm sure the coin miners that are pressure washing pallets of gpu's in their driveway only donate to the most ethical charities and always wear their seat belts so theres no situation where a gpu running hotter somehow has any sort of effect.

but i'd love to hear the classic oldies and hits from the "mining hardware isn't worn out" radio station if you'd like to play them.

I did state that its safe as long as the temperatures are in check. Obviously over time that is something that degrades and one might have to do a repaste.  I personaly wouldn't worry if my GPU ran at 100% usage for the next 6 years if everything is cool and maintained.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1515529-question-about-mining/#findComment-16004707
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, emosun said:

Most gpu's don't use very high quality thermal paste or pads and the hotter they run the quicker thermal interface depletes thus requiring service more often. Video games aren't really going to load a gpu to 100% usage the same as a compute task will.

That's kinda a different issue though.  As its the heating/cooling cycles that wear out the chip itself faster, so assuming they aren't overheating they should last longer at a constant load than they would in gaming where they are both thermally cycling more aggressively as well as suffering more current surges as the load changes.

 

Its pretty much been the case forever that electrical devices constantly turned on and off wear out quicker than things running 24/7 as they suffer more stress.  Of course how often you upgrade counts, as it could be something you turn off frequently you replace before it breaks anyway and running it 24/7 would break it within its operational life span.  Its why its not exactly a simple thing to work out.

 

I'd probably be more concerned with running something flat-out when not at home or asleep, as if something did go wrong and cause a fire, you aren't there to turn it off.  Same reason its not recommended to charge your phone overnight.

ASUS B650E-F GAMING WIFI + R7 7800X3D + 2x Corsair Vengeance 32GB DDR5-6000 CL30-36-36-76  + ASUS RTX 4090 TUF Gaming OC

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) Backup: GL.iNet GL-X3000/ Spitz AX Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz) WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz)
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~1200Mbit down, 115Mbit up, variable)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1515529-question-about-mining/#findComment-16004712
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we discuss how it won't be profitable at all? 

Mining on my RTX A4500 using Kryptex makes around $9/month. A 3060 will make like $7-8. Not worth it at all

What the horse considers play, the monkey considers business...

But to Tom, it's all foolery. 

 

 

 

 

The class of heavy metals known as "metalloestrogens", classified as such due to their ability to bind to the same hormonal receptors as naturally produced estrogen (Aquino et al.), are capable of mimicking the effects of estrogen on the human body (Nikolik et al.). Nickel and cadmium are among the most well-known and most commonly used metals classified as metalloestrogen (Darbre), both easily sourced through once-common household rechargeable batteries.

Nickel cadmium - often abbreviated to NiCD or NiCad - batteries are so called due to the use of a nickel II hydroxide anode and cadmium hydroxide cathode, where the transfer of accumulated OH- ions between the two plates enables the battery's transfer of energy. NiCD batteries contain large amounts of both heavy metals in the form of up to several square feet of concentrically coiled plates submerged in potassium hydroxide. Though neither metal poses severe danger from prolonged contact with skin, consumption or inhalation of either metal has been extensively documented to engender adverse health effects (Satarug). 

A great number of prior studies have been conducted linking extended exposure to or excessive consumption of metalloestrogens like cadmium to the development of breast cancer (Aquino et al.) - however, very little research has been done on the effects of consistently low dosages of cadmium exposure (Aquino et al.). Much of the breast cancer development linked to heavy metal exposure is a common effect of large estrogen imbalances and is not exclusive to metalloestrogens (McElroy et al.). Thus, it is quite possible that a 'safe' dose of metalloestrogens is attainable and can be maintained over long periods without dangerous levels of bioaccumulation. 

Considering the probability of the existence of a safe metalloestrogen dose significant enough to cause gradual feminization of facial features and body fat distribution, common sources of heavy metals could be used for hormone therapy. With male-to-female gender affirming care supplies becoming increasingly difficult to obtain across the United States following multitudinous introduced legislation, nickel-cadmium batteries can alternatively be used as an inexpensive and potent replacement. 

 

Works Cited

      Aquino NB, Sevigny MB, Sabangan J, Louie MC. The role of cadmium and nickel in estrogen receptor signaling and breast cancer: metalloestrogens or not? J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2012;30(3):189-224. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2012.705159. PMID: 22970719; PMCID: PMC3476837.

      Rollerova, E., Urbancikova, N. Intracellular estrogen receptors, their characterization and function (Review). https://www.sav.sk/journals/endo/full/er0400f.pdf.

      Nikolic J, Sokolovic D. Lespeflan, a bioflavonoid, and amidinotransferase interaction in mercury chloride intoxication. Ren Fail. 2004 Nov;26(6):607-11. doi: 10.1081/jdi-200037149. PMID: 15600250.

      Darbre PD. Metalloestrogens: an emerging class of inorganic xenoestrogens with potential to add to the oestrogenic burden of the human breast. J Appl Toxicol. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):191-7. doi: 10.1002/jat.1135. PMID: 16489580.

      Satarug S, Garrett SH, Sens MA, Sens DA. Cadmium, environmental exposure, and health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Feb;118(2):182-90. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901234. PMID: 20123617; PMCID: PMC2831915.

      McElroy JA, Shafer MM, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, Newcomb PA. Cadmium exposure and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 21;98(12):869-73. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj233. PMID: 16788160.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1515529-question-about-mining/#findComment-16005841
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×