I can't get 60 fps in warzone with a 6600xt and a ryzen 5700G

[CTLegeniCodrule]

Even every setting on low won't do much to my fps... i can t only get 60-70 fps but it looks TRASH

[SavageNeo]

drivers for the gpu?

Monitore plugged into the gpu rather than in the motherboard?

Temps of the gpu?

 

cpu temps? what case and cooler?

chipset drivers installed?

 

what ram config? need more info

[CTLegeniCodrule]

I updated all my drivers yesterday while trying to do something about the performance in warzone... still nothing. My gpu won't go over 60-65 degrees and the gpu while under full load 75 degrees

The monitor is also plugged in the gpu

[QuantumSingularity]

Run a benchmark here and share the results so we can see if anything is underperforming.

[Mark Kaine]

It's not a great GPU (basically mid tier) Im not surprised it only gets around  60.

also what resolution?  

[thecremeegg]

I have a 3080 & a 5800x and the game sits at under 100fps frequently on performance DLSS and maninly low settings - it's just terribly optimised, and seems it prefers intel

[QuantumSingularity]

Guys, run a user benchmark test and share the results. Quite often the problem isn't in the GPU or CPU, but something else that prevents them from performing like they should. Especially with majority of the pre-built systems, where you get the cheapest possible mobo and PSU, with terrible case and your hardware toasts itself even staying on idle. The game has worse code the optimization even than the launch version of Cyberpunk 2077, but on 3070 with 5600X and above it shouldn't have trouble holding 150FPS on 1080p high and 100+ FPS on 1440p high. I've seen prebuilt system with PSUs that struggle with just 300W on the 12V rails and they've been paired with 3080 GPUs...

[Levent]

Out of anything please dont run userbenchmark. It is a piece of shit. 3dmark is more reliable, it has a free version.

[QuantumSingularity]

3D mark is a great stress test for system stability and overclocks on GPUs and CPUs. However not everyone is willing to spend €25. It also doesn't give information about the mobo and GPU bios, memory information and hard drive performance. Often for diagnosing problems userbenchamrk is better since it basically highlights in red and yellow where your problems might lay so you know where to start looking. After you've fixed them and everything reports that it runs as it should, then you might wanna try 3d Mark, Furmark, Memtes, Aida ... or whatever other software out there you like to stress test your system. It's of no use to see low 3D Mark TimeSpy score with clocks and temp that report normal. 

[Mark Kaine]

On 5/28/2022 at 4:50 PM, thecremeegg said:

I have a 3080 & a 5800x and the game sits at under 100fps frequently on performance DLSS and maninly low settings - it's just terribly optimised, and seems it prefers intel

i did run the game at 170fps high settings with a 3600 and 3070 so I dunno about this intel thing!

 

 

[MadAnt250]

Look up how many people have performance problems with COD Warzone. Look on the forums here and on other sites and you will find the game just has carp performance.

[QuantumSingularity]

It's kinda true - the game optimization really is crap. BUT in many occasions it's also user's fault. I have many clients brining PC with poor performance in different games, but mostly Warzone and Battlefield and ALWAYS there is something wrong with the system - either an old BIOS, or out of date drivers or crappy bloated Windows (even worse on those who use activators and don't wanna pay $3 for a license) or crappy PSU/Motherboard/RAM that holds back the rest of the system. There is always something. I haven't encountered a single system where everything is perfect, but the game runs poorly. Even my low system with the 3600X and the GTX 1070 holds average above 100FPS in Warzone at 1080p High Settings.