Is an IPS 300 nits 45% NTSC screen bad?

[Wavernor]

Hi,

I'm planning on getting a Lenovo Thinkpad E14 Gen 3. The website says the screen is "14.0" FHD (1920x1080) IPS Anti-Glare 300nits Narrow Bezel 45% NTSC Non-Touch 60Hz". Even though it is an IPS screen, does the fact that it's 45% NTSC mean that it's not that particulary amazing. There is a cheaper option that is "14.0" FHD (1920x1080) IPS Anti-glare 250nits Non-Touch Narrow Bezel" which doesn't mention being 45% NTSC, would this option be better?

I plan to use the laptop mainly for coding, web browsing and occasionally for Netflix and light gaming. Everything else about the laptop seems great but I just want to make sure that the screen isn't bad.

 

Link to the laptop: https://www.lenovo.com/gb/en/laptops/thinkpad/edge-series/ThinkPad-E14-Gen-3-14”-AMD/p/22TPE14E4A3

[sahara742]

Its not going to be the brightest screen you've ever seen and may have issues with direct sunlight scenarios but would be fine for what you described in my opinion. 

[Electronics Wizardy]

This seems to be a review with that display. https://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-ThinkPad-E14-G3-AMD-Laptop-Review-Affordable-Business-Notebook-with-Ryzen-Power.551070.0.html

 

Seems fine, not great, but fine for your listed uses.

[Darkseth]

Not bad, but not good either. It's just basic standard.

Well, slightly above that, because it has 300 nits over 250 nits. 45% ntsc = 58-60%~ sRGB.

 

I don't know of any 250 nit Notebook screen with more than 45% NTSC. However, there are some E14/E15 G2 and G3 models with 100% sRGB (72%~ NTSC) and 300 nits brightness.

[Wavernor]

The screen should be fine then so I've ordered my latptop. Thanks for the advise everyone.