Jump to content

I was talking on twitter how i was excited to play cyberpunk and a few others games in 4k and a random twitter user said “playing high end games in 4k would destroy your pc within 2 years” Im pretty sure what hes stating is false but wanted extra thoughts. 

 

P.S. i have a 3090 and 5900x build. The monitor is the ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQ 144hz 4k 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1287453-does-consistent-4k-gaming-damage-your-pc/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you had your computer doing stress tests/benchmarks in 4k with litterally no breaks for 2 years, then  yes you might have a slightly shorter lifespan,

but i'm not sure why that twitter user would think it damages the pc

Anything i've written between the * and * is not meant to be taken seriously.

keep in mind that helping with problems is hard if you aren't specific and detailed.

i'm also not a professional, (yet) so make sure to personally verify important information as i could be wrong.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol your PC doesn't care if you're playing at 4K or 1080p. A load scenario is a load scenario.

 

That's like Dell selling a warranty to a gamer because his PC is more likely to break than for a office user.

If someone did not use reason to reach their conclusion in the first place, you cannot use reason to convince them otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Stahlmann said:

Lol your PC doesn't care if you're playing at 4K or 1080p. A load scenario is a load scenario.

 

That's like Dell selling a warranty to a gamer because his PC is more likely to break than for a office user.

Well yes and no. If you had vsync or a frame cap on your GPU would be less stressed running 1080p vs 4k.

 

But generally the GPU was made for that and doesn't care. 

Gaming HTPC:

R5 5600X - Cryorig C7 - Asus ROG B350-i - EVGA RTX2060KO - 16gb G.Skill Ripjaws V 3333mhz - Corsair SF450 - 500gb 960 EVO - LianLi TU100B


Desktop PC:
R9 3900X - Peerless Assassin 120 SE - Asus Prime X570 Pro - Powercolor 7900XT - 32gb LPX 3200mhz - Corsair SF750 Platinum - 1TB WD SN850X - CoolerMaster NR200 White - Gigabyte M27Q-SA - Corsair K70 Rapidfire - Logitech MX518 Legendary - HyperXCloud Alpha wireless


Boss-NAS [Build Log]:
R5 2400G - Noctua NH-D14 - Asus Prime X370-Pro - 16gb G.Skill Aegis 3000mhz - Seasonic Focus Platinum 550W - Fractal Design R5 - 
250gb 970 Evo (OS) - 2x500gb 860 Evo (Raid0) - 6x4TB WD Red (RaidZ2)

Synology-NAS:
DS920+
2x4TB Ironwolf - 1x18TB Seagate Exos X20

 

Audio Gear:

Hifiman HE-400i - Kennerton Magister - Beyerdynamic DT880 250Ohm - AKG K7XX - Fostex TH-X00 - O2 Amp/DAC Combo - 
Klipsch RP280F - Klipsch RP160M - Klipsch RP440C - Yamaha RX-V479

 

Reviews and Stuff:

GTX 780 DCU2 // 8600GTS // Hifiman HE-400i // Kennerton Magister
Folding all the Proteins! // Boincerino

Useful Links:
Do you need an AMP/DAC? // Recommended Audio Gear // PSU Tier List 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FloRolf said:

Well yes and no. If you had vsync or a frame cap on your GPU would be less stressed.

 

But generally the GPU was made for that and doesn't care. 

You have a point, but GPUs most likely last longer than they're relevant in terms of performance. So that's pretty much a non-issue.

 

For example, i just recently sold a GTX 660Ti which was still running fine but can barely run todays games.

If someone did not use reason to reach their conclusion in the first place, you cannot use reason to convince them otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the thinking behind it that pushing your rig to output in 4k continuously is putting more strain on your components, heating them up etc...and thus could shorten the lifespan of said components?

 

Is there some element of truth to it?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They were probably trolling you. Running PC within normal operating conditions will not change the way parts degrade. And yes, they will degrade, like every mechanical thing will. But lifetime of single part (which is some 5-10 years at minimum) doesn't shorten if you are using it as its designed to be used. By this I mean no overclocking or anything where you are tweaking hardware settings differently from what the factory had them set to.

 

Overclocking can shorten lifespan or increase degration. When overclocking you are running on higher voltages, and temperatures. Both have effects. But nothing so dramatic than 2 years till destruction.

^^^^ That's my post ^^^^
<-- This is me --- That's your scrollbar -->
vvvv Who's there? vvvv

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LogicalDrm said:

They were probably trolling you. Running PC within normal operating conditions will not change the way parts degrade. And yes, they will degrade, like every mechanical thing will. But lifetime of single part (which is some 5-10 years at minimum) doesn't shorten if you are using it as its designed to be used. By this I mean no overclocking or anything where you are tweaking hardware settings differently from what the factory had them set to.

 

Overclocking can shorten lifespan or increase degration. When overclocking you are running on higher voltages, and temperatures. Both have effects. But nothing so dramatic than 2 years till destruction.

Thank you for the info! Also all my parts arent OC’d or tweaked i dont have enough knowledge to do that yet. Also ik for a fact hes not trolling he actually thinks that cause he also doesn’t believe 8K is possible like at all even when theres videos of youtubers playing 8k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Maury Sells Wigs said:

Is the thinking behind it that pushing your rig to output in 4k continuously is putting more strain on your components, heating them up etc...and thus could shorten the lifespan of said components?

 

Is there some element of truth to it?

 

 

I have no idea but even at that i have top on the line specs made for 4k gaming and technically could push to 8K so i think hes just lost lmfao

Link to post
Share on other sites

4k gaming mainly damages the wallet.

 

Here is a comparison of RDR 2 at 1440p and 4k. At 4k the CPU is working less since the frames are lower. The GPU is about the same with 4k using more vram.

rDr21440vs4k.thumb.jpg.dd7a770940cb88a3c1852463f45afd81.jpg 

 

With AC:O on the highest preset.  The CPU usage goes down as the resolution goes up. The GPU is using more power at 4k than at the other resolutions.

ACO4k1080p1440ptest.jpg.0475f35cad10212f5480d7bdc7250378.jpg

 

 

Both games don't really benefit from 4k so I played them on an Ultrawide.

 

RIG#1 CPU: AMD, R 7 5800x3D| Motherboard: X570 AORUS Master | RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32GB DDR4 3200 | GPU: EVGA FTW3 ULTRA  RTX 3090 ti | PSU: EVGA 1000 G+ | Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic | Cooler: EK 360mm AIO | SSD#1: Corsair MP600 1TB | SSD#2: Crucial MX500 2.5" 2TB | Monitor: ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ

 

RIG#2 CPU: Intel i9 11900k | Motherboard: Z590 AORUS Master | RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32GB DDR4 3600 | GPU: EVGA FTW3 ULTRA  RTX 3090 ti | PSU: EVGA 1300 G+ | Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO | Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 | SSD#1: SSD#1: Corsair MP600 1TB | SSD#2: Crucial MX300 2.5" 1TB | Monitor: LG 55" 4k C1 OLED TV

 

RIG#3 CPU: Intel i9 10900kf | Motherboard: Z490 AORUS Master | RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32GB DDR4 4000 | GPU: MSI Gaming X Trio 3090 | PSU: EVGA 1000 G+ | Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic | Cooler: EK 360mm AIO | SSD#1: Crucial P1 1TB | SSD#2: Crucial MX500 2.5" 1TB | Monitor: LG 55" 4k B9 OLED TV

 

RIG#4 CPU: Intel i9 13900k | Motherboard: AORUS Z790 Master | RAM: Corsair Dominator RGB 32GB DDR5 6200 | GPU: Zotac Amp Extreme 4090  | PSU: EVGA 1000 G+ | Case: Streacom BC1.1S | Cooler: EK 360mm AIO | SSD: Corsair MP600 1TB  | SSD#2: Crucial MX500 2.5" 1TB | Monitor: LG 55" 4k B9 OLED TV

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/30/2020 at 12:39 PM, Stahlmann said:

Lol your PC doesn't care if you're playing at 4K or 1080p. A load scenario is a load scenario.

 

That's like Dell selling a warranty to a gamer because his PC is more likely to break than for a office user.

 

SHHHHHHH

You end up giving Dell new business ideas.

And next thing you know everybody will follow suite.

And in your annual review for medical insurance there will be a check box right next to smoking how many hours do you spend gaming per week.

Steam GOG and Epci will start selling data about how many hours a week you play just like sports app makers to adjust your insurance rating.

 

 

After all gaming causes stress and stress is bad for your health. Further more you spend time in-front of a screen that damages your eyes. Sitting damages your posture.....

 

 

 

 

PS. Starts taking notes and preparing a presentation for the next Startup Founders Meetup.

If this materialises you heard it here first the first "GAMER" insurance.

 

 

 

But seriously unless you are somehow overclocking your system or running into power or thermal issues under load there really is no difference how many pixels you are pushing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with others, not sure how playing a game at 4K would destroy your PC in 2 years time unless your PC is severely overheating then maybe it will shorten the lifespan of the components inside.

 

Even with overheating, there are safety measures that are put in place to prevent this, regardless of what resolution you play, if you're PC is properly built without any issues with temperatures, I don't see anything happening to your PC because of a resolution...

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

GPU: AMD Radeon RX 6900XT

MB: ASUS ROG Dark Hero VIII 570S

MEMORY: Corsair Vengence RGB Pro 32GB (8GB x 4) @ 3200Mhz

CASE: Corsair 680x

STORAGE: 256GB M.2(PCIE) EVO 970 | 1TB Curcial M.2 (PCIE) SSD

PSU: Corsair RM850x

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×