Bitwit 3080 Benchmarks

[flashiling]

 

yea basically just bitwit uploading benchmarks of the 3080

[Hairless Monkey]

Thanks, friend!

[flashiling]

1 minute ago, HairlessMonkeyBoy said:

Thanks, friend!

no problemo.

tho it wasn't needed apparently since anthony also made a post about the LTT video.  

[xg32]

yikes, multiple benchmarks showing it barely ahead of the 2080 ti, looks like specific games like bl3/doom puts it ahead but now we know why those games were used.

[i_build_nanosuits]

2 minutes ago, xg32 said:

yikes, multiple benchmarks showing it the same as the 2080 ti, looks like specific games like bl3/doom puts it ahead but now we know why those games were used.

?! What?

we havnt watched the same content...in the video im watching it's whooping the 2080ti ass real bad even in RDR2 it's leading by over 35%...

[xg32]

Just now, i_build_nanosuits said:

?! What?

we havnt watched the same content...in the video im watching it's whooping the 2080ti ass real bad even in RDR2 it's leading by over 35%...

RT on i expected it, but overall it looks underwhelming. 11% average gains, obviously im skimming through multiple reviews but yikes so far.

[i_build_nanosuits]

Just now, xg32 said:

RT on i expected it, but overall it looks underwhelming. 11% average gains.

no...even in older games like assassin's creed and RDR2 that dont have ray tracing at all it's KICKING BUTT"..watch the digital foundry review.

That GPU is a masterpiece.

[xg32]

Just now, i_build_nanosuits said:

no...even in older games like assassin's creed and RDR2 that dont have ray tracing at all it's KICKING BUTT"..watch the digital foundry review.

That GPU is a masterpiece.

are u talking about the old DF review? cause im going over the new reviews right now, or did DF also pump out one today.

[i_build_nanosuits]

2 minutes ago, xg32 said:

are u talking about the old DF review? cause im going over the new reviews right now, or did DF also pump out one today.

they did release a new video yes.

i don't know where you got that 11% from but it's clearly and easily a lot more than that...anywhere from 25 to 40% is what im seeing.

Clearly the new GPU is head and shoulders above the old one. it's obvious.

[xg32]

3 minutes ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

they did release a new video yes.

i don't know where you got that 11% from but it's clearly and easily a lot more than that...anywhere from 25 to 40% is what im seeing.

Clearly the new GPU is head and shoulders above the old one. it's obvious.

bitwit had it at 11%, unboxed has it at 19% (i'm only looking at 1% lows), but ya, it's less than expected, the 30% gains are at 4k only, hoping the 3090 doesn't disappoint. 

[i_build_nanosuits]

1 minute ago, xg32 said:

bitwit had it at 11%, unboxed has it at 19% (i'm only looking at 1% lows), but ya, it's less than expected, hoping the 3090 doesn't disappoint.

why only 1% low those are generaly spikes caused by the CPU and rest of the syystem pipeline...you want to see the overall performance of a GPU not a CPU right now so the AVERAGE FPS is what you want to look at for these reviews.

[xg32]

1 minute ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

why only 1% low those are generaly spikes caused by the CPU and rest of the syystem pipeline...you want to see the overpower power of a GPU not a CPU right now so the AVERAGE FPS is what you want to look at for these reviews.

never been a fan of that since the drops are what i notice even with gsync on, but to each his own.

[i_build_nanosuits]

1 minute ago, xg32 said:

never been a fan of that, but to each his own.

no you dont understand..its not a matter of "being a fan'' of anything...it's logic...it's how life is...everything has a purpose...1% and ,1% lows TELL A LOT yes...but NOT for GPU performance...they are a lot more important when looking at overall CPU and system performance etc.

It's a useless metric here.

[xg32]

Just now, i_build_nanosuits said:

no you dont understand..its not a matter of "being a fan'' of anything...it's logic...it's how life is...everything has a purpose...1% and ,1% lows TELL A LOT yes...but NOT for GPU performance...they are a lot more important when looking at overall CPU and system performance etc.

It's a useless metric here.

and i understand that i only look at 1% lows, im not trying to convince u of anything.

[i_build_nanosuits]

Just now, xg32 said:

and i understand that i only look at 1% lows, im not trying to convince u of anything.

ok...and the 3080 is only 11% faster than 2080ti...all day long haha

have a good one mate, im out!

[Deli]

2 minutes ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

ok...and the 3080 is only 11% faster than 2080ti...all day long haha

have a good one mate, im out!

It's a big jump from last gen. But not 2X faster than 2080 as Nvidia claims.

[i_build_nanosuits]

Just now, Deli said:

It's a big jump from last gen. But not 2X faster than 2080 as Nvidia claims.

no of courseit's not would you imagine that?! come on...maybe in ray tracing full blown and some very select situations...

[Deli]

Just now, i_build_nanosuits said:

no of courseit's not would you imagine that?! come on...maybe in ray tracing full blown and some very select situations...

If on average the 3080 is 80% faster than 2080. Ok I can take it. However it's not quite even that. More like 50- 60%.

 

Don't get me wrong. It's still very impressive, especially for the price.

[i_build_nanosuits]

Just now, Deli said:

If on average the 3080 is 80% faster than 2080. Ok I can take it. However it's not quite even that. More like 50- 60%.

 

Don't get me wrong. It's still very impressive, especially for the price.

compare to the 1080 then...if you have a 2080 you should not even be looking at these reviews right now...unless you have a 2060 you,re set if you have a 20 series card.

 

[WkdPaul]

* thread cleaned *

 

Please stay on-topic, and follow Community Standards when interacting with others.

[vong]

So not as impressive as nvidia made it out to be. RIP to the panic sellers. Looks good at 4k though. Wait till the 3080 ti comes out, I reckon it should be around 40-50% faster than the 2080 ti.

[Lord Bloobus]

1 minute ago, vong said:

So not as impressive as nvidia made it out to be. RIP to the panic sellers. Looks good at 4k though. Wait till the 3080 ti comes out, I reckon it should be around 40-50% faster than the 2080 ti.

If this is what you think based off this singular review, you're quite wrong, go watch more. People panic selling were trying to recoup money, it's still better used on a 3080, meaning if you bought and panic sold a 2080ti, you're stupid for buying it in the first place at the mere mention of a performance increase.

 

Don't like that he only benched against a 2080ti when most users aren't using one, and it's supposed to be compared to the 2080. Pretty much only Jay and Linus had 2080s in their bench lineup.

[RasmusDC]

but seems in target with what was said on the conference..

 

2x the RTX performances of a 2080 if full raytracing is implemented, Control is 2x the performance on a 2080..

 

rasterization is nearly 60% on average on a 2080 (even often an oc edition) in 1080p the difference is smaller, but it seems to be the bottleneck of fps capping and cpu bottlenecks that hits there 4K performance is kig

 

it runs 1440p at same fps as the 2080 runs 1080p.. that is pulling. 3.6 million pixels at the same speed 2080 is rendering 2 million..

 

by my standard this is one of the biggest leaps performance wise, and also the things that enables using raytracing in higher resolutions, and this is even without DLSS...

 

i´m old, so might be easier to impress, but in my 42 years, and 32 years of owning a pc.. i feel like these gains where only when we went from 2d to a 3d PowerVR, 3dFX style card... where we also gained som impressive graphics at the time..

 

looking at the compute power of the R6000 Big navi, it does seem like, it has to do something special, to get just on par with the 3070... and then it has to be cheap, AMD did not show anything good with the 5700XT, is it a price to performance monster, but the driver issues there was just enough for me not to buy a card like that again (my son has one)

[RasmusDC]

2 minutes ago, Lord Bloobus said:

Don't like that he only benched against a 2080ti when most users aren't using one, and it's supposed to be compared to the 2080. Pretty much only Jay and Linus had 2080s in their bench lineup.

most test are done vs 2080... Jay also tested it against a 2080amp.

 

and if you look into many charts the 2080 is there, it is just so low compared, that it really is not a fair fight.

[Lord Bloobus]

7 minutes ago, RasmusDC said:

most test are done vs 2080... Jay also tested it against a 2080amp.

 

and if you look into many charts the 2080 is there, it is just so low compared, that it really is not a fair fight.

I've watched Bitwit, Nexus, Jay, and Linus; Jay and Linus ( and sometimes Nexus) are the only ones actually using the card that this is meant to be compared to. If they used a 2080 Super, they're not making the actual comparison that we're looking for since the Super tier is about 5-10% better than stock.