Why is my gpu score not above their's?

[destroyer6400000]

Their's (current top spot): https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/30117363

Mine (clearly higher): https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/30292958

[Haro]

Don't use user benchmark 

It's full of bs.

[destroyer6400000]

7 minutes ago, TofuHaroto said:

Don't use user benchmark 

It's full of bs.

Then what do you recommend?

[Haro]

Just now, destroyer6400000 said:

Then what do you recommend?

Do a stress test like furmark or firestrike or look at a reputable review from hardware unboxed or GN 

Anything but this pile of bs.

[destroyer6400000]

1 minute ago, TofuHaroto said:

Do a stress test like furmark or firestrike or look at a reputable review from hardware unboxed or GN 

Anything but this pile of bs.

I already did that stuff I just wanted a score on where its not just me that knows its there

[Haro]

1 minute ago, destroyer6400000 said:

I already did that stuff I just wanted a score on where its not just me that knows its there

Why do you care ? If the numbers are correct then your all good 

User benchmark is full of bs

Is not trust worthy and is full of lies.

[destroyer6400000]

1 minute ago, TofuHaroto said:

Why do you care ? If the numbers are correct then your all good 

User benchmark is full of bs

Is not trust worthy and is full of lies.

I just wanted something that would make my work stand out because I cant game on it at that overclock it starts to get buggy I just wanted big numbers. its ok though

[SpookyCitrus]

3 minutes ago, destroyer6400000 said:

I already did that stuff I just wanted a score on where its not just me that knows its there

Anytime you run a 3DMark stress test or benchmark you have the option to share the result. If you want your score out there so people can see it, then use Firestrike or Timespy then share the result when it's done... You'd have to have an impossible overclock for it standout on any site that compares benchmark results, most of the testers are going to be benchmarking overclocks, literally thousands of the results are going to be OC'd so unless your overclock is insane it's not going to standout.

[destroyer6400000]

13 minutes ago, SpookyCitrus said:

Anytime you run a 3DMark stress test or benchmark you have the option to share the result. If you want your score out there so people can see it, then use Firestrike or Timespy then share the result when it's done... You'd have to have an impossible overclock for it standout on any site that compares benchmark results, most of the testers are going to be benchmarking overclocks, literally thousands of the results are going to be OC'd so unless your overclock is insane it's not going to standout.

I know and also my Rx 590 isnt going to make any splashes in the heavy weight scene the only reason I was using userbenchmark was because it has a worst and best of gpu podiums and I wanted the best one because I wasn't far off

[Tristerin]

4 minutes ago, destroyer6400000 said:

I know and also my Rx 590 isnt going to make any splashes in the heavy weight scene the only reason I was using userbenchmark was because it has a worst and best of gpu podiums and I wanted the best one because I wasn't far off

 

25 minutes ago, destroyer6400000 said:

I just wanted something that would make my work stand out because I cant game on it at that overclock it starts to get buggy I just wanted big numbers. its ok though

 

 

This is the reason no one uses Userbenchmark as an actual indicator of performance.  You have a unstable OC that passed their very...un-rigorous test.  

 

If you REALLY need it to show as teh best, then email the website support, tell them you are an Intel shill and they will welcome you quickly into the fold.

 

But in reality, if you wanted to show everyone a cool OC, plenty of legitimate options available already mentioned above - do that, and people will remember you like Achilles.

 

In fact, your run just skews data to the foolish who think Userbenchmark is good - your unstable OC will show other people that theirs is underperforming...when in fact its being beaten by clocks that are not attainable or sustainable.

[destroyer6400000]

1 minute ago, Tristerin said:

 

 

 

This is the reason no one uses Userbenchmark as an actual indicator of performance.  You have a unstable OC that passed their very...un-rigorous test.  

 

If you REALLY need it to show as teh best, then email the website support, tell them you are an Intel shill and they will welcome you quickly into the fold.

 

But in reality, if you wanted to show everyone a cool OC, plenty of legitimate options available already mentioned above - do that, and people will remember you like Achilles.

 

In fact, your run just skews data to the foolish who think Userbenchmark is good - your unstable OC will show other people that theirs is underperforming...when in fact its being beaten by clocks that are not attainable or sustainable.

Well I have a stable overclock it just wasnt scoring as high and I know their test is trash. and my overclock is on the stock air cooler

[LogicalDrm]

13 hours ago, destroyer6400000 said:

Well I have a stable overclock it just wasnt scoring as high and I know their test is trash. and my overclock is on the stock air cooler

Your score for just GPU is higher than the other one. Yours is 72%, their 67.7%. Are you just reading it wrong?