Jump to content

Radeon R9 280X 3GB Preformance

Go to solution Solved by Mr.Meerkat,

The 280X is still a really capable card where it's more powerful than a RX460/960/1050ti ect. but is weaker than a RX470/970. I'd say you'll get quite easily like 4 more years of 1080p gaming at lower settings later on. 

Is anybody able to let me know how the R9 280X should preform?  This card is being given to me free of charge to use in my new pc build, and I was wondering how soon I should plan to upgrade.  I'm planning to play AAA games in 1080p, and I'm pretty lenient on the graphics settings. 

 

Full PC Specs -

Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz Quad-Core Processor

MSI Z170A PC MATE ATX LGA1151 Motherboard

Crucial 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2133 Memory (link provided)

Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive

Western Digital Blue 3TB 3.5" 5400RPM Internal Hard Drive

PowerColor Radeon R9 280X 3GB TurboDuo Video Card

Raidmax Smilodon ATX-612WEBP ATX Mid Tower Case w/500W Power Supply

Thermaltake SMART 750W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply (link provided)

Asus PCE-AC55BT PCI-Express x1 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi Adapter

-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Slightly faster than a 1050 ti, but still much slower than a 470.

CPU i7 6700 Cooling Cryorig H7 Motherboard MSI H110i Pro AC RAM Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB DDR4 2133 GPU Pulse RX 5700 XT Case Fractal Design Define Mini C Storage Trascend SSD370S 256GB + WD Black 320GB + Sandisk Ultra II 480GB + WD Blue 1TB PSU EVGA GS 550 Display Nixeus Vue24B FreeSync 144 Hz Monitor (VESA mounted) Keyboard Aorus K3 Mechanical Keyboard Mouse Logitech G402 OS Windows 10 Home 64 bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

should do well for 1080p upgrade when you don't get the desired performance. 

Good luck, Have fun, Build PC, and have a last gen console for use once a year. I should answer most of the time between 9 to 3 PST

NightHawk 3.0: R7 5700x @, B550A vision D, H105, 2x32gb Oloy 3600, Sapphire RX 6700XT  Nitro+, Corsair RM750X, 500 gb 850 evo, 2tb rocket and 5tb Toshiba x300, 2x 6TB WD Black W10 all in a 750D airflow.
GF PC: (nighthawk 2.0): R7 2700x, B450m vision D, 4x8gb Geli 2933, Strix GTX970, CX650M RGB, Obsidian 350D

Skunkworks: R5 3500U, 16gb, 500gb Adata XPG 6000 lite, Vega 8. HP probook G455R G6 Ubuntu 20. LTS

Condor (MC server): 6600K, z170m plus, 16gb corsair vengeance LPX, samsung 750 evo, EVGA BR 450.

Spirt  (NAS) ASUS Z9PR-D12, 2x E5 2620V2, 8x4gb, 24 3tb HDD. F80 800gb cache, trueNAS, 2x12disk raid Z3 stripped

PSU Tier List      Motherboard Tier List     SSD Tier List     How to get PC parts cheap    HP probook 445R G6 review

 

"Stupidity is like trying to find a limit of a constant. You are never truly smart in something, just less stupid."

Camera Gear: X-S10, 16-80 F4, 60D, 24-105 F4, 50mm F1.4, Helios44-m, 2 Cos-11D lavs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 280X is still a really capable card where it's more powerful than a RX460/960/1050ti ect. but is weaker than a RX470/970. I'd say you'll get quite easily like 4 more years of 1080p gaming at lower settings later on. 

Looking at my signature are we now? Well too bad there's nothing here...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What? As I said, there seriously is nothing here :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much guys!  This answered my question.

-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, AdvocateOfNyx said:

Is anybody able to let me know how the R9 280X should preform?  This card is being given to me free of charge to use in my new pc build, and I was wondering how soon I should plan to upgrade.  I'm planning to play AAA games in 1080p, and I'm pretty lenient on the graphics settings. 

 

Full PC Specs -

Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz Quad-Core Processor

MSI Z170A PC MATE ATX LGA1151 Motherboard

Crucial 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2133 Memory (link provided)

Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive

Western Digital Blue 3TB 3.5" 5400RPM Internal Hard Drive

PowerColor Radeon R9 280X 3GB TurboDuo Video Card

Raidmax Smilodon ATX-612WEBP ATX Mid Tower Case w/500W Power Supply

Thermaltake SMART 750W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply (link provided)

Asus PCE-AC55BT PCI-Express x1 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi Adapter

can i fix your build though

because a 5400 rpm 3 tb hdd a kingston ssd and that psu  is 750w i don't think you need it  also why would you buy a case with a 500w psu  give us a budget and we can probably fix your new pc builds

but if you already did your build its completely fine

Mouse: Logitech g402 <3

Keyboard: Some Tenkeyless with blue kalih switches

Headphones: Logitech g430

Monitor: HP w2207h (1680 x 1050 @ 60hz)

PC Specs:CPU(AMD A8 6500 @3.5ghz), Mobo ( ASUS A68HM-E  FM2+), 1x1600mhz 4gb stick of ram, Random grey PSU, 920gb ssd

PhoneIphone 5 32gb

Tablet: Ipad 2 16gb

Laptop:Toshiba satelite with 8gb of ram a 480gb ssd and a mobile 2nd gen I3

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

~

-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, crysilis said:

can i fix your build though

because a 5400 rpm 3 tb hdd a kingston ssd and that psu  is 750w i don't think you need it  also why would you buy a case with a 500w psu  give us a budget and we can probably fix your new pc builds

but if you already did your build its completely fine

The case and GPU are old parts being given to me as a gift.  The PSU inside the case is terrible, and has been trashed already.  I have substituted the HDD, although I DO need the 3tb.  The SSD is for core applications.  The parts have already been ordered, but I thank you for trying to help. 

-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, AdvocateOfNyx said:

The case and GPU are old parts being given to me as a gift.  The PSU inside the case is terrible, and has been trashed already.  I have substituted the HDD, although I DO need the 3tb.  The SSD is for core applications.  The parts have already been ordered, but I thank you for trying to help. 

because 5400 rpm is painfully slow so :/

Mouse: Logitech g402 <3

Keyboard: Some Tenkeyless with blue kalih switches

Headphones: Logitech g430

Monitor: HP w2207h (1680 x 1050 @ 60hz)

PC Specs:CPU(AMD A8 6500 @3.5ghz), Mobo ( ASUS A68HM-E  FM2+), 1x1600mhz 4gb stick of ram, Random grey PSU, 920gb ssd

PhoneIphone 5 32gb

Tablet: Ipad 2 16gb

Laptop:Toshiba satelite with 8gb of ram a 480gb ssd and a mobile 2nd gen I3

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, crysilis said:

because 5400 rpm is painfully slow so :/

It was either that or no SSD. 

-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/17/2017 at 9:51 AM, Mr.Meerkat said:

The 280X is still a really capable card where it's more powerful than a RX460/960/1050ti ect. but is weaker than a RX470/970. I'd say you'll get quite easily like 4 more years of 1080p gaming at lower settings later on. 

 

On 1/17/2017 at 9:53 AM, AdvocateOfNyx said:

Thanks so much guys!  This answered my question.

It's surprisingly fast. (And Most 280x's are clocked faster than the 7970's they replaced)

The HD7970 was re-flashed into the 280x, but the 280x as higher default clocks most of the time.

How it performs in a few games (TF2/BF1/World of Tanks/Warships/DirtRally)

Still can do many games at Ultra/V-High without much issue.

Can still use Heavy FPS cutting techniques still like 4xMSAA in some titles. (DirtRally)

A Beast GPU still.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SkilledRebuilds said:

 

It's surprisingly fast.

The HD7970 was re-flashed into the 280x

How it performs in a few games (TF2/BF1/World of Tanks/Warships/DirtRally)

 

 
 

Hmm...  I'm curious.  Does this mean the card is also capable of recording 1080p 60fps?  (ish)

 

(I do realise most of the recording falls to the CPU)

Edited by AdvocateOfNyx

-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AdvocateOfNyx said:

Hmm...  I'm curious.  Does this mean the card is also capable of recording 1080p 60fps?  (ish)

Yep, AMD Re-Live works in HD7970 and 280x and all that. It works pretty flawlessly, didn't see any performance dips after the initial triggered to start, after 1second it is full speed ahead.

 

The GPU may record 1080p 60fps, the encoder chip itself, may have troubles sometimes (when looking at video properties, avg recording fps was 54fps when the game was above 60fps) while video was encoded at 60fps, it looks like that 55fps (Limitation of the Encoding CHIP onboard)

It's still good to just SET 60fps anyway, it's close enough. (Older GPU driven recording software, I'd use medium quality and it would hit 60fps, HQ would drop recording fps)

But it's still better than nothing, or CPU alternatives.

 

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SkilledRebuilds said:

Yep, AMD Re-Live works in HD7970 and 280x and all that. It works pretty flawlessly, didn't see any performance dips after the initial triggered to start, after 1second it is full speed ahead.

 

The GPU may record 1080p 60fps, the encoder chip itself, may have troubles sometimes (when looking at video properties, avg recording fps was 54fps when the game was above 60fps) while video was encoded at 60fps, it looks like that 55fps (Limitation of the Encoding CHIP onboard)

It's still good to just SET 60fps anyway, it's close enough. (Older GPU driven recording software, I'd use medium quality and it would hit 60fps, HQ would drop recording fps)

But it's still better than nothing, or CPU alternatives.

 

 

Hmm...  I'm currently using a family PC and using OBS Studio, so I'll be interested to see what AMD Re-Live has to offer.  Thanks for the help!  :D

-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AdvocateOfNyx said:

Hmm...  I'm currently using a family PC and using OBS Studio, so I'll be interested to see what AMD Re-Live has to offer.  Thanks for the help!  :D

I DID have to manually enable it in the control panel.

Games were legit as fast as they should be while recording, no lag.

Recordings were fine altho at times, just under 60fps (depends on game complexity and encoding stress) Other games the recordings were all 60fps avg.

 

But yeah, AMD-Relive has HD7000 Series/200 series support.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SkilledRebuilds said:

I DID have to manually enable it in the control panel.

Games were legit as fast as they should be while recording, no lag.

Recordings were fine altho at times, just under 60fps (depends on game complexity and encoding stress) Other games the recordings were all 60fps avg.

 

But yeah, AMD-Relive has HD7000 Series/200 series support.

 
 

Great!  I'll make sure to add "Manually enable AMD Re-Live" to the list of things I have to do once all the parts come in. :S Thanks for all of your help!

 

-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AdvocateOfNyx said:

It was either that or no SSD. 

oof at least its easily upgradable in the future I guess

Mouse: Logitech g402 <3

Keyboard: Some Tenkeyless with blue kalih switches

Headphones: Logitech g430

Monitor: HP w2207h (1680 x 1050 @ 60hz)

PC Specs:CPU(AMD A8 6500 @3.5ghz), Mobo ( ASUS A68HM-E  FM2+), 1x1600mhz 4gb stick of ram, Random grey PSU, 920gb ssd

PhoneIphone 5 32gb

Tablet: Ipad 2 16gb

Laptop:Toshiba satelite with 8gb of ram a 480gb ssd and a mobile 2nd gen I3

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×