Jump to content

GTX 970 - best driver and Nvidia's crusade on degrading performance in new drivers

Fixxer8
Go to solution Solved by i_build_nanosuits,
3 hours ago, don_svetlio said:

Your friend is semi-correct. Support for older GPUs is shit and the newer drivers are not optimized for them. I'd say stick with 361.75 as the ones after are quite bad.

As an example - in Dark Souls 3 - Fermi users would triple their frames per second by going to the drivers from 2012

^^can you believe this?! so much BULLSHIT and it has been selected as the best answer...

i have a GTX 980ti myself and the performance has not gotten worse by any stretch of the imagination.

And Pascal is VERY similar to Maxell in terms of it's architecture...pascal is a shrunken maxwell, overclocked to the hills... so the improvement in driver to make pascal perform better will ALSO benefit maxwell based cards.

 

OP, do not believe in that SHIT...it's COMPLETELY STUPID...it has been proved now that NVIDIA IS NOT GIMPING older cards through drivers in fact it has been revisited quite a bit recently and you can see the results here, the performance improvements are not huge for these older cards but KEEP IN MIND these architecture (Fermi and Kepler) are A LOT different then what nvidia is using for maxwell and pascal...they don't even use tile-based rasterization like the new cards.

 

Keep your driver up to date if you want the best performance out of your card in games.

 

Here, check this video and this link...they did testing on kepler cards and proved that NVIDIA IS NOT gimping older cards...even those...they are different that's why they didn't benefited much from driver optimisation over time...

http://www.babeltechreviews.com/nvidia-forgotten-kepler-gtx-780-ti-vs-290x-revisited/view-all/

''It is clear that the latest generation of DX11/12 games are far more demanding on video cards, but especially regarding vRAM usage.  The GTX 780 Ti is rarely limited by its 3GB of vRAM, and when it happens, the frame rates will often improve dramatically by lowering a few settings.  It is clear that Nvidia has not neglected Kepler, but they are clearly more focused on Maxwell performance as it is their current architecture. ''

Its a simple question, i have the GTX 970, and after the last driver-update i could swear that performance had degraded, not much but still to some degree. Am i beeing paranoid or have other owners of the GTX 970 noticed this?

 

And also, what driver would you guys suggest me rolling back to? If its even possible, without getting a " You' are running older drivers, please update them to the latest one" message smack in your face ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure the person to uncover the Nvidia driver downgrade conspiracy is the guy who isn't sure if installing old drivers is even possible or not.

What a fuckin joke

 

How in the fuck would you even get that message? Do you have GFE installed too? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not mad hehe. Oh and the message appeard in Witcher 3 at some point, before updating to a newer driver. I do plan on abit more deep testing, just to see what happens.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a GTX970 and running latest drivers

 

Quote

You' are running older drivers, please update them to the latest one

WTF?!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, lets say they' dont do it on purpose and im just paranoid. How would i determine the best possible driver for the GTX 970 ? In general

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, zMeul said:

I have a GTX970 and running latest drivers

 

WTF?!

 

That message appears when you're on older drivers. Like i am now, a couple of steps behind. Witcher 3 and Rise of the Tomb Raider, pestering me with driver updates for my GTX 970

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fixxer8 said:

Ok, lets say they' dont do it on purpose and im just paranoid. How would i determine the best possible driver for the GTX 970 ? In general

does it crashes?! then it's good

you notice something funky? then test it against the older driver

 

Quote

That message appears when you're on older drivers. Like i am now, a couple of steps behind. Witcher 3 and Rise of the Tomb Raider, pestering me with driver updates for my GTX 970

stop using GFE

wtf are you using it for?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Removed, been dorment for a while and never really used.. Now that's sorted out. 

Then my second question, alrite. Are there any advantage of having the latest latest driver, or would reverting to an older set, say the one that came out for Witcher 3 be a better option? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Removed, been dorment for a while and never really used.. Now that's sorted out. 

Then my second question, alrite. Are there any advantage of having the latest latest driver, or would reverting to an older set, say the one that came out for Witcher 3 be a better option?

 

And sorry to give you the wrong impression, its early in the morning and i was convinced by a friend that Nvidia is running a crusade to earn money, by making you buy new graphics-cards :/ 

 

Im not really that crazy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fixxer8 said:

Removed, been dorment for a while and never really used.. Now that's sorted out. 

Then my second question, alrite. Are there any advantage of having the latest latest driver, or would reverting to an older set, say the one that came out for Witcher 3 be a better option?

 

And sorry to give you the wrong impression, its early in the morning and i was convinced by a friend that Nvidia is running a crusade to earn money, by making you buy new graphics-cards :/ 

 

Im not really that crazy 

Your friend is semi-correct. Support for older GPUs is shit and the newer drivers are not optimized for them. I'd say stick with 361.75 as the ones after are quite bad.

As an example - in Dark Souls 3 - Fermi users would triple their frames per second by going to the drivers from 2012

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zMeul said:

does it crashes?! then it's good

you notice something funky? then test it against the older driver

 

stop using GFE

wtf are you using it for?!

ShadowPlay! Wooo!  Still figuring out the right settings for NVENC recording on OBS, man that SP colour degradation ):

QUOTE ME IN A REPLY SO I CAN SEE THE NOTIFICATION!

When there is no danger of failure there is no pleasure in success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Samfisher said:

ShadowPlay! Wooo!  Still figuring out the right settings for NVENC recording on OBS, man that SP colour degradation ):

I've seen more color washout from the transcoding software than OBS recording

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, zMeul said:

I've seen more color washout from the transcoding software than OBS recording

Huh? SP has colour washout, OBS using NVENC supposedly doesn't, and I haven't found a setting that doesn't lag my PC when I start recording with OBS (even with NVENC, not x264) so I just resort to using ShadowPlay instead.

QUOTE ME IN A REPLY SO I CAN SEE THE NOTIFICATION!

When there is no danger of failure there is no pleasure in success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Samfisher said:

Huh? SP has colour washout, OBS using NVENC supposedly doesn't, and I haven't found a setting that doesn't lag my PC when I start recording with OBS (even with NVENC, not x264) so I just resort to using ShadowPlay instead.

this is what I use and I don't have issues with recording

 

VgScP6b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Over the last couple of years I have seen at least 2 sites test the claim that Nvidia gimps their driver. Both found a moderate improvement in performance of the card over time in the same games. So the latest drivers are the best. There is no "gimping" of old Nvidia cards, all the data says that is not true it is a false claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, don_svetlio said:

Your friend is semi-correct. Support for older GPUs is shit and the newer drivers are not optimized for them. I'd say stick with 361.75 as the ones after are quite bad.

As an example - in Dark Souls 3 - Fermi users would triple their frames per second by going to the drivers from 2012

^^can you believe this?! so much BULLSHIT and it has been selected as the best answer...

i have a GTX 980ti myself and the performance has not gotten worse by any stretch of the imagination.

And Pascal is VERY similar to Maxell in terms of it's architecture...pascal is a shrunken maxwell, overclocked to the hills... so the improvement in driver to make pascal perform better will ALSO benefit maxwell based cards.

 

OP, do not believe in that SHIT...it's COMPLETELY STUPID...it has been proved now that NVIDIA IS NOT GIMPING older cards through drivers in fact it has been revisited quite a bit recently and you can see the results here, the performance improvements are not huge for these older cards but KEEP IN MIND these architecture (Fermi and Kepler) are A LOT different then what nvidia is using for maxwell and pascal...they don't even use tile-based rasterization like the new cards.

 

Keep your driver up to date if you want the best performance out of your card in games.

 

Here, check this video and this link...they did testing on kepler cards and proved that NVIDIA IS NOT gimping older cards...even those...they are different that's why they didn't benefited much from driver optimisation over time...

http://www.babeltechreviews.com/nvidia-forgotten-kepler-gtx-780-ti-vs-290x-revisited/view-all/

''It is clear that the latest generation of DX11/12 games are far more demanding on video cards, but especially regarding vRAM usage.  The GTX 780 Ti is rarely limited by its 3GB of vRAM, and when it happens, the frame rates will often improve dramatically by lowering a few settings.  It is clear that Nvidia has not neglected Kepler, but they are clearly more focused on Maxwell performance as it is their current architecture. ''

| CPU: Core i7-8700K @ 4.89ghz - 1.21v  Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  CPU Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 |
| GPU: MSI RTX 3080Ti Ventus 3X OC  RAM: 32GB T-Force Delta RGB 3066mhz |
| Displays: Acer Predator XB270HU 1440p Gsync 144hz IPS Gaming monitor | Oculus Quest 2 VR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you 

6 hours ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

^^can you believe this?! so much BULLSHIT and it has been selected as the best answer...

i have a GTX 980ti myself and the performance has not gotten worse by any stretch of the imagination.

And Pascal is VERY similar to Maxell in terms of it's architecture...pascal is a shrunken maxwell, overclocked to the hills... so the improvement in driver to make pascal perform better will ALSO benefit maxwell based cards.

 

OP, do not believe in that SHIT...it's COMPLETELY STUPID...it has been proved now that NVIDIA IS NOT GIMPING older cards through drivers in fact it has been revisited quite a bit recently and you can see the results here, the performance improvements are not huge for these older cards but KEEP IN MIND these architecture (Fermi and Kepler) are A LOT different then what nvidia is using for maxwell and pascal...they don't even use tile-based rasterization like the new cards.

 

Keep your driver up to date if you want the best performance out of your card in games.

 

Here, check this video and this link...they did testing on kepler cards and proved that NVIDIA IS NOT gimping older cards...even those...they are different that's why they didn't benefited much from driver optimisation over time...

http://www.babeltechreviews.com/nvidia-forgotten-kepler-gtx-780-ti-vs-290x-revisited/view-all/

''It is clear that the latest generation of DX11/12 games are far more demanding on video cards, but especially regarding vRAM usage.  The GTX 780 Ti is rarely limited by its 3GB of vRAM, and when it happens, the frame rates will often improve dramatically by lowering a few settings.  It is clear that Nvidia has not neglected Kepler, but they are clearly more focused on Maxwell performance as it is their current architecture. ''

Thank you for that information.  I really had no other info than that my friend gave me, so you kinda end up beliving it..

I made an utter fool of myself.  Dang it. 

 

Well,  im abit wiser now :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fixxer8 said:

Thank you 

Thank you for that information.  I really had no other info than that my friend gave me, so you kinda end up beliving it..

I made an utter fool of myself.  Dang it. 

 

Well,  im abit wiser now :)

I have been running the latest drivers and say an increase in stability for my overclock. It's stability I haven't seen in quite a while. For months and months my once rock solid overclocked was broken from driver updates. At last it is almost where it was before. Granted I did a Windows reinstall so keep that in mind but even before the reinstall I noticed more stability.

 

My main point is that while different drivers may have hurt my overclock stability they haven't hurt stock performance. I always hit a good GPU boost off my OC like I had when I first bought the card.

First build every: Intel Core i7 4790K, Asus Z97-A/USB 3.1 motherboard, Kingston HyperX FURY 1866 2x8 16GB Kit, Gigabyte Windforce GTX 970 G1 Gaming, Corsair Obsidian 450D Black ATX Mid Tower, Samsung 850 EVO 250GB & 3TB Toshiba HDD, EVGA SuperNOVA 750W G2, Corsair H100i GTX 240mm, Gigabyte Bluetooth 4.0/Wifi Card, Logitech G700S. Running on Windows 10

Surface Pro 3: i5 4300U with 8GB of ram and 256GB SSD. Running Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if it isn't broke... I'm using 359.00 and don't have issues... so why update?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, alphaproject said:

Well, if it isn't broke... I'm using 359.00 and don't have issues... so why update?

Bug fixes, new features. With that attitude you may as well just keep the release drivers, why 359.00?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

People accusing Nvidia of decreasing GPU perforamance through driver updates....are straight up wrong on that score. My GTX 650ti OC 2GB which is Kepler proves that, and so does my GTX 970 G1 Gaming (the "upgrade" from the 650ti-which is to this day my favourite graphics card despite being weaker than the 970). I haven't tried with the last drivers, but with the Mobility Radeon HD5650, OpenGL performance was reduced by 2 thirds from the original 2010 driver to the ones that come with Catalyst 13.2 under Windows 7 and 10 with fresh re-installs of Windows, so Windows 7 and 10 weren't at fault for the performance drop. I will be trying the drivers that come with Catalyst 15 (Crimson sucks as it has no OpenCL support in its drivers) to see if AMD restored performance BTW.

"We also blind small animals with cosmetics.
We do not sell cosmetics. We just blind animals."

 

"Please don't mistake us for Equifax. Those fuckers are evil"

 

This PSA brought to you by Equifacks.
PMSL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BrightCandle said:

Bug fixes, new features. With that attitude you may as well just keep the release drivers, why 359.00?

After this particular release... I did not see any games that would benefit from updating them. I've seen more issues GPU wise after these drivers and since I have zero issues...I don't see why I should upgrade. I play no "new" games. The newest game I've played was Mushroom wars 2 (Beta) and it did not need a 970 to play it. I've seen guys update just because and end up regretting it so I just stayed with what driver seems to not crash my system. Bug fixes you say... like what was in 359 that is fixed, where something else didn't get broken in the later versions? New features... ok, explain them to me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

 

Uses nvidia drivers 368.69 for GTX 970. Now they are only improving the performance of Pascal (the new GTX), but they reduce the performance of maxwell, and the latest updates to improve the performance of maxwell are since they came out Until 368.69. 
          ⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇                ⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇                 ⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇                  ⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇                 ⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇                ⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇
                                         or 
 
I tested it and it worked, the performance increased more than 20%, it makes a clean and customized installation of these drivers, not install in the Geforce experience installer. Greetings.
 
sorry for my english
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×