GTX 970 - best driver and Nvidia's crusade on degrading performance in new drivers
3 hours ago, don_svetlio said:Your friend is semi-correct. Support for older GPUs is shit and the newer drivers are not optimized for them. I'd say stick with 361.75 as the ones after are quite bad.
As an example - in Dark Souls 3 - Fermi users would triple their frames per second by going to the drivers from 2012
^^can you believe this?! so much BULLSHIT and it has been selected as the best answer...
i have a GTX 980ti myself and the performance has not gotten worse by any stretch of the imagination.
And Pascal is VERY similar to Maxell in terms of it's architecture...pascal is a shrunken maxwell, overclocked to the hills... so the improvement in driver to make pascal perform better will ALSO benefit maxwell based cards.
OP, do not believe in that SHIT...it's COMPLETELY STUPID...it has been proved now that NVIDIA IS NOT GIMPING older cards through drivers in fact it has been revisited quite a bit recently and you can see the results here, the performance improvements are not huge for these older cards but KEEP IN MIND these architecture (Fermi and Kepler) are A LOT different then what nvidia is using for maxwell and pascal...they don't even use tile-based rasterization like the new cards.
Keep your driver up to date if you want the best performance out of your card in games.
Here, check this video and this link...they did testing on kepler cards and proved that NVIDIA IS NOT gimping older cards...even those...they are different that's why they didn't benefited much from driver optimisation over time...
http://www.babeltechreviews.com/nvidia-forgotten-kepler-gtx-780-ti-vs-290x-revisited/view-all/
''It is clear that the latest generation of DX11/12 games are far more demanding on video cards, but especially regarding vRAM usage. The GTX 780 Ti is rarely limited by its 3GB of vRAM, and when it happens, the frame rates will often improve dramatically by lowering a few settings. It is clear that Nvidia has not neglected Kepler, but they are clearly more focused on Maxwell performance as it is their current architecture. ''
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now